Shapefiles for "complete" India

24960 views
Skip to first unread message

Karthik Shashidhar

unread,
Jan 3, 2012, 11:22:57 PM1/3/12
to data...@googlegroups.com
All the shapefiles for India that I have downloaded do not show PoK and Aksai Chin as part of India. Does anyone here have access to shapefiles that include these territories? Basically looking to publish (online) some maps, so want to make sure that it's accurate. 

(I looked through the group archives, and all sources mentioned there do not show these regions as part of India)

Thanks
Karthik

S Anand

unread,
Jan 4, 2012, 2:21:23 AM1/4/12
to data...@googlegroups.com
We've got SVG files at http://gramener.com/indiamap/ -- at a State and District level. PoK is labelled separately, and Aksai Chin is included as part of Leh. These are consistent with the 2011 census maps. Does that help?

Regards,
Anand

sandeep

unread,
Apr 13, 2012, 10:36:02 PM4/13/12
to data...@googlegroups.com
Dear Karthik,

Did you get shapefiles asked? Need them too. Would be grateful if you can share.

Regards,
Sandeep

Arun Ganesh

unread,
Apr 14, 2012, 1:01:18 AM4/14/12
to data...@googlegroups.com
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Karthik Shashidhar <karthik.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
All the shapefiles for India that I have downloaded do not show PoK and Aksai Chin as part of India. Does anyone here have access to shapefiles that include these territories? Basically looking to publish (online) some maps, so want to make sure that it's accurate. 

(I looked through the group archives, and all sources mentioned there do not show these regions as part of India)

You can try the shapefiles from http://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/
It includes the shapes for the disputed regions which you can join with the Indian territory.

Thanks
Karthik



--
j.mp/ArunGanesh

Arun Ganesh

unread,
Apr 14, 2012, 1:05:28 AM4/14/12
to data...@googlegroups.com
This would be a better option. Its based on the official census2001 district shapefiles:
--
j.mp/ArunGanesh

Karthik Shashidhar

unread,
May 6, 2012, 8:36:53 AM5/6/12
to data...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for this Arun.

This is a district-wise map. Is there an intuitive way to convert this into a state-wise map, given that the name of the state has also been included here? 

Arun Ganesh

unread,
May 6, 2012, 10:04:55 AM5/6/12
to data...@googlegroups.com
I got some errors while processing the census data. I have made a combined shapefile with the natural earth data.
--
j.mp/ArunGanesh
naturalearth_india_adm1.dbf
naturalearth_india_adm1.shp
naturalearth_india_adm1.shx
naturalearth_india_adm1.prj

Pavan Srinath

unread,
May 15, 2012, 2:21:49 AM5/15/12
to data...@googlegroups.com
I came across a new source for administrative areas shapefiles is this: http://gadm.org/ 
For India, there are good quality shapefiles available at the country, state, district and taluk levels.

It shouldn't be too hard to recreate the complete J&K shapefile from those given here. 

Cheers,
Pavan

Arun Ganesh

unread,
May 15, 2012, 2:25:23 AM5/15/12
to data...@googlegroups.com
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Pavan Srinath <pavan....@gmail.com> wrote:
I came across a new source for administrative areas shapefiles is this: http://gadm.org/ 
For India, there are good quality shapefiles available at the country, state, district and taluk levels.

It shouldn't be too hard to recreate the complete J&K shapefile from those given here. 

Its possible to create the pok side because azad kashmir and northern areas are administrative divisions in pakistan, but there is no shapes to create the chinese occupied side of j&k. 

Cheers,
Pavan

On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Arun Ganesh <arung...@gmail.com> wrote:
I got some errors while processing the census data. I have made a combined shapefile with the natural earth data.


On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Karthik Shashidhar <karthik.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for this Arun.

This is a district-wise map. Is there an intuitive way to convert this into a state-wise map, given that the name of the state has also been included here? 


On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Arun Ganesh <arung...@gmail.com> wrote:
This would be a better option. Its based on the official census2001 district shapefiles:

On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Arun Ganesh <arung...@gmail.com> wrote:


On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Karthik Shashidhar <karthik.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
All the shapefiles for India that I have downloaded do not show PoK and Aksai Chin as part of India. Does anyone here have access to shapefiles that include these territories? Basically looking to publish (online) some maps, so want to make sure that it's accurate. 

(I looked through the group archives, and all sources mentioned there do not show these regions as part of India)

You can try the shapefiles from http://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/
It includes the shapes for the disputed regions which you can join with the Indian territory.

Thanks
Karthik



--
j.mp/ArunGanesh



--
j.mp/ArunGanesh




--
j.mp/ArunGanesh




--
j.mp/ArunGanesh

Avinash Celestine

unread,
May 15, 2012, 3:11:54 AM5/15/12
to data...@googlegroups.com
Hi

the shapefiles from gadm.org seem to be based on census 2001, since
they contain (on cursory examination) to have details for around 593
districts. There are around 640 districts as of census 2011.

Here's an alternative source which has district maps for census 2011,
but it's SVG format rather than shapefiles.

hope this helps

rgds

Avinash

Avinash Celestine

unread,
May 15, 2012, 3:12:26 AM5/15/12
to data...@googlegroups.com
oops forgot the link. sorry

http://www.s-anand.net/blog/india-district-map/

rgds

Avinash

sandeep

unread,
Aug 22, 2012, 12:19:03 AM8/22/12
to data...@googlegroups.com
Those of us who have been constrained from publishing map-charts due to non-availability of official India shapefiles, (including Aksai chin and POK), the wait is finally over. You could download these from Maptell site- India shapefiles . 

Sabarish, KSITM

unread,
Aug 22, 2012, 8:48:51 AM8/22/12
to data...@googlegroups.com
For the Road Maps of Kerala- Not the shape files

http://www.keralapwd.gov.in/intranet/getPage.php?page=RoadMap&pageId=292


--
 
 
 

Dilip Damle

unread,
Aug 1, 2014, 11:33:58 AM8/1/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Hello,

This is an old post.
However this is the appropriate place to add an additional source.

I had downloaded the set from Grid Geneva many years ago.
The original complete source was named as GNV197 which is 24 MB
Titled as "HUMAN POPULATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES DATABASE FOR ASIA"
I am attaching the South Central Asia E00 file.

That set contains The disputed areas under the country name IN1 and IN2

This dataset can not be easily found at present on the GRID Geneva site http://www.grid.unep.ch/index.php?lang=en in the same name.
may be it is still there somewhere with some other name.

For copyright check the metadata file which is here

http://geonetwork.grid.unep.ch/geonetwork/srv/en/iso19139.xml?id=835

rgds
Dilip Damle
sc_asia.7z

Sharad Lele

unread,
Aug 3, 2014, 12:45:26 PM8/3/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Dear Dilip and others:

I have been following this thread with interest, but to be honest am a bit lost now. Can someone post a summary of which maps mentioned so far have what features (which coverage, pertaining to which year, what attributes (such as census codes), etc.)? Would be most helpful.

Sharad

Thejesh GN

unread,
Aug 3, 2014, 2:02:43 PM8/3/14
to data...@googlegroups.com

Actually its not a bad idea to list it on the wiki. Let me know i will create an account.

--
Thejesh GN ⏚ ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್
http://thejeshgn.com
GPG ID :  0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0

--
Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Dilip Damle

unread,
Aug 4, 2014, 12:20:26 AM8/4/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Sharad, 

I am working on some things will revert in about a week or may be more.

Thejesh,

Go ahead, 

Actually there was one more source a Low Resolution (vertices) District map by VDS technologies. 
I have it as Polylines in Autocad. I seem to have lost the original file. 
If anyone has then please share it. (it does not seem to be on their site now)

D Thakker

unread,
Aug 4, 2014, 8:53:07 AM8/4/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
thanks Dilip for your hardwork.
I have been on a lookout for all taluka / tehsil shape file, so how do I be in a loop as I am very keen to see the repository mail / list.

Dilip Damle

unread,
Aug 4, 2014, 9:50:38 AM8/4/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Mr Thakkar, 

Please also look at another post (more than one) on this group  about Taluk Shapefiles by Justin Meyers

So far as I know GADM is the source that has Taluk files.
I am not sure about its completeness and accuracy as on today

http://www.gadm.org/

Sharad Lele

unread,
Aug 6, 2014, 2:06:04 PM8/6/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
I have downloaded and checked the GADM boundaries (my version is 2011). The taluka boundary layer probably holds good today, becuase few talukas get split. Districts get split regularly (every so many years) so the district boundary layer in this GADM set is quite of date (may apply to 2001 or so). The spatial registration (positional accuracy is ~1km, and the spatial detail is of course not as good as the boundaries given in a Survey of India 50k topo, but then that is an unfair standard, so by a more generalized standard, the quality is okay.

Sharad

Devdatta Tengshe

unread,
Aug 6, 2014, 11:36:02 PM8/6/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Hi Sharad,

I just download the GDAM data again, to confirm what you have said.

I'm going to have to disagree with you about the quality of the IND_adm3 data.


Acoording to the 2001 Census, there are 5454 Sub Districts in India. The GDAM dataset has just 2299 features.

So clearly these taluk features do not correspond to the 2001 Census. I cross checked for some areas I have ground knowledge of, and I can say that this dataset is not from any specific era. Some tehsils in the file were created post 2001, while others created in the 90's were not present.

In my opinion the GDAM data is pretty much unusable.


Regards,
Devdatta

Devdatta Tengshe

unread,
Aug 7, 2014, 12:18:53 AM8/7/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
In Continuation of my previous email, here is a CSV file which shows just how bad the GDAM dataset is.

Regards,
Devdatta
SubDistricts.csv

Avinash Celestine

unread,
Aug 7, 2014, 6:51:22 AM8/7/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
apologies for seeing this thread slightly late

a slightly better source for 2001 data is the shapefiles within the dev info INdia software. I have attached the shapefile i put together from that of individual states and regions. It has about 5468 attributes

http://devinfo.info/devinfoindia/

essentially you download the 'desktop setup' and install. the shapefiles (different one for each district if i remember) get installed to a directory. you can put together the all india file from there.

Avinash
india subdists 2001.zip

"Sharad Lele [शरच्चंद्र लेले]"

unread,
Aug 7, 2014, 6:58:17 AM8/7/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
I think I have the explanation for why I am seeing a good match and you are not:

The problem lies in defining what is the 'sub-district' unit (in IND_adm3). Administratively speaking, it is tehsil, below which lies CD block. Unfortunately, census gives information by CD block. So there are more 'sub-district' units in Census than tehsils in the country. GDAM seems to have followed the tehsil concept.

To check: Karnataka is one state in which tehsil and CD block are one and the same. That is why the sub-district layer IND_adm3 matches perfectly for Karnataka, but not for other states. There might be some other states where this holds good, I don't know.

Anyway, so if one really wants CD block level boundaries, we have to look at Justin, I guess.

But the GDAM boundaries are not 'wrong'.

Sharad
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "datameet" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/datameet/X5kzViRMJKs/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to datameet+u...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Democratizing Forest Governance in India
(In press with Oxford University Press India)

Sharad Lele

unread,
Aug 7, 2014, 7:39:14 AM8/7/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
If I am right, then Justin may want to rename his layer as CDBlocks_2001...

Sharad
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "datameet" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/datameet/X5kzViRMJKs/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to datameet+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Eric Dodge

unread,
Aug 7, 2014, 10:45:45 AM8/7/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
This is very interesting Sharad.

I've been looking for maps of what I've been calling administrative blocks, that is, the units overseen by block development officers. MGNREGA data is aggregated at this level and I've been hoping to use the data to do some mapping exercises.

The census sub-districts are called differently across states (tahsil, taluk, mandal, etc). You can see the list here:


I know that in all the states where census sub-districts are called taluk, mandal, or CD block (with the exception of TN), the census sub-district is identical to the administrative block. 

I've already completed a mapping exercise for Bihar using the census sub-district map and the data matched up pretty well. If the IND_adm3 data is indeed the administrative blocks then I could do a similar exercise with Madhya Pradesh. I'll take a look to see if the data lines up correctly.

Has anybody dug into this issue any deeper? I've heard that tehsil comes from the revenue side whereas taluk, mandal, etc comes from the administrative side but that doesn't explain why the census uses different sub-district units across states.

Best,
Eric
Message has been deleted

"Sharad Lele [शरच्चंद्र लेले]"

unread,
Aug 7, 2014, 12:31:01 PM8/7/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Dear Eric:

Here is my understanding:

1. The census does not create any category, be it tehsil, block or mandal. These are statutory or administrative categories created under various state laws and programmes at various points in time. Note that "Block" is same as "Community Development Block or CD Block". Taluk and tehsil are synymous, and come from the revenue side. Block comes from the rural development department. Mandal comes from panchayati raj (decentralised governance).

2. Note also that different states have different decisions about how blocks are demarcated. At one end, Karnataka says CD blocks are same as tehsils/taluks. Some states have 1-2 blocks per tehsil. Some states found tehsils too big and have lots of blocks per tehsil. But as far as I know, blocks are strict subsets, and don't straddle tehsil boundaries.

3. Census only has to decide at what level to provide data to the user for a given state. E.g. ,in a district census handbook, whether to have chapters organized by tehsil or by block. So the table you refer to only tells us what choices they made in different states. It does not mean (e.g.,) that there are no tehsils in Jharkhand. Just that Census did not use that level. But yes, since Census says that MP data are reported at Tahsil level, I would think that the GADM boundaries for MP will match the tehsil boundaries and hence the census data. But the GADAM data may be outdated: tehsils have also sometimes been added (districts being split is more common).

Hope this helps.
Sharad
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "datameet" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/datameet/X5kzViRMJKs/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to datameet+u...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Democratizing Forest Governance in India
(In press with Oxford University Press India)
--
Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "datameet" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/datameet/X5kzViRMJKs/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to datameet+u...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Democratizing Forest Governance in India
(In press with Oxford University Press India)
Message has been deleted

"Sharad Lele [शरच्चंद्र लेले]"

unread,
Aug 7, 2014, 12:51:39 PM8/7/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
On 07-Aug-14 8:18 PM, Justin Meyers wrote:
> As per our conversation yesterday, could you upload your data? You
> keep criticizing everyone else's data, but you don't share your own!??
> Help me help you :)
Dear Justin:

I think you are going too far and too fast. A more moderate tone would
be appreciated.

1. I never criticized anyone: in fact, i said GDAM was ok, and you were
the one who used fairly strong words against it.
2. I have only clarified out that your layer reflects CD block
boundaries while GDAM reflects tehsil boundaries. Both may be 'ok' in
what they represent.
3. The only reason I have not shared any data of mine is simply because
I have only two datasets: the GDAM one (which is both already available
and being criticised by some ;-)) and a dataset of admin boundaries
(district and tehsil) for Karnataka state alone which we paid for and
got digitized from District Census Handbooks of 1991. When I check GDAM
or your layer versus this layer, I see no major differences. So then
what is the point in uploading that data?

Sharad
Message has been deleted

Dilip Damle

unread,
Aug 7, 2014, 2:28:14 PM8/7/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Hello all,

Nice enlightening discussion with a little sparks,

A small thumbnail photo of the member may help reduce sparks because then you create an image of that person in your mind based on the photo. BTW my photo here is about 40 years outdated now I look more ferocious :)

Any way to add to the confusion there is also the Division
So it seems to be 

Country > State > Division > District > Tehsil / Taluk > Some Kind of  Block > Village

Let us first get this ans confirm  if each is subset of the other or there are overlaps and if there is any other item missing in between then let us proceed      

On Thursday, August 7, 2014 10:32:08 PM UTC+5:30, Justin Meyers wrote:
Sharad,
Sorry about my tone; I get excited/ pushy when it comes to geospatial data.  In my experience, you have to ask, ask again, and keep asking (like I did with you until you finally responded).  I guess I should only ask once, and if you don't respond, then you never will...

In my honest opinion, GADM is junk.  If you want me to explain the top ten reasons why, I can.  

As per you sharing your data; if you can share it, it would be great.  Digitized one off data is unique, and could be better than what is on this forum.  If you or your company paid for the data, and cannot share, it makes sense.  I figure since you are here, looking for free data (or whatever), asking questions about it, and have data, why not share what you have.

Just my 2 cents.  Sorry for coming off as a jerk. I apologize.

Justin

Sharad Lele

unread,
Aug 8, 2014, 8:56:48 AM8/8/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Dilip, only one kind of 'block', which is CD block (but often just referred to as 'block').

But to complicate life :-) there can be several other admin & governance levels in between. For instance, in Karnataka, 10-20 villages are grouped into a 'hobli' by the revenue department. (below taluka level). Similarly, several villages (usually less than those in a hobli) are grouped together into a Gram Panchayat. In Maharashtra, gram panchayat and revenue village are I think identical. (Just to remind ourselves: when we say 'village', we mean revenue village--which is what census uses. Not gram panchayat, nor hamlet of any kind).

Sharad

Dilip Damle

unread,
Aug 10, 2014, 12:44:00 AM8/10/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Sharad, 

yes Panchayat is a collection of Villages. 

That sent me to search for data / list of panchayats. 
There are many website for Local Governance most of them do not function properly. 

however one of them lgdirectoty.gov.in seems to work and there is s downloadable data out there.
well till one goes an hits is head on the captcha thing. 

I tried several browsers but the captcha image is broken.

If anyone can try and find a workaround it will be good.
In the meantime I am trying to send them an email

Dilip Damle

unread,
Aug 10, 2014, 12:55:16 AM8/10/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Hi all, 

A lot of discussion has happened after this, especially regarding various internal administrative boundary sources.
This post is just about outer boundary including disputed areas  and Natural Earth Dataset. 

I have merged the Disputed Areas and created a modified dataset.
The changes have been done in the India Boundary as well as neighboring countries.

The original data is in Public domain and I have not used any other data nor changed any vertices.
Hence this set is also in Public domain. 

Scale 1: 10m 
More details in Readme file inside

Natural earth also has Admin1 (State) Boundaries,
I will do the Telangana split and add that data set later


On Saturday, April 14, 2012 10:31:18 AM UTC+5:30, Arun Ganesh wrote:


On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Karthik Shashidhar <karthik.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
All the shapefiles for India that I have downloaded do not show PoK and Aksai Chin as part of India. Does anyone here have access to shapefiles that include these territories? Basically looking to publish (online) some maps, so want to make sure that it's accurate. 

(I looked through the group archives, and all sources mentioned there do not show these regions as part of India)

You can try the shapefiles from http://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/
It includes the shapes for the disputed regions which you can join with the Indian territory.

Thanks
Karthik
NaturalEarth_10M_India_corrected.7z

Arun Ganesh

unread,
Aug 10, 2014, 3:03:15 AM8/10/14
to datameet
Those interested in mapping the different types of boundaries can maybe help review how good these tagging guidelines on openstreetmap are:

This will really help if an and when such data starts being imported into the project.


--
Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Arun Ganesh

Dilip Damle

unread,
Aug 10, 2014, 4:01:26 AM8/10/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Hi

Just came across this link that seems to have a village shapfile of India somewhere 

http://revolutionarygis.wordpress.com/2014/06/19/india-village-shapefile/

"Sharad Lele [शरच्चंद्र लेले]"

unread,
Aug 11, 2014, 5:46:12 AM8/11/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Very excited about this! But the file is not actually downloadable, it
seems. One has to write to fidel castro... has anyone gotten a reply?

Sharad

Nisha Thompson

unread,
Aug 11, 2014, 8:35:28 AM8/11/14
to datameet
I have sent Fidel a mail.  I have a feeling that he is pro open data.

nisha


--
Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Nisha Thompson
DataMeet.org
skype: nishaqt
mobile: 962-061-2245

Dilip Damle

unread,
Aug 11, 2014, 2:30:12 PM8/11/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Hi,
I felt that the name was a kind of a pseudonym.
Let us see if he responds.


On Monday, August 11, 2014 6:05:28 PM UTC+5:30, Nisha Thompson wrote:
I have sent Fidel a mail.  I have a feeling that he is pro open data.

nisha
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:16 PM, "Sharad Lele [शरच्चंद्र लेले]" <shara...@gmail.com> wrote:
Very excited about this! But the file is not actually downloadable, it seems. One has to write to fidel castro... has anyone gotten a reply?

Sharad


On 10-Aug-14 1:31 PM, Dilip Damle wrote:
Hi

Just came across this link that seems to have a village shapfile of India somewhere

http://revolutionarygis.wordpress.com/2014/06/19/india-village-shapefile/


--
Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+u...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Dilip Damle

unread,
Aug 12, 2014, 2:16:19 PM8/12/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Hi,

This is just to add one more source for the Complete Boundary including Disputed areas and the whole world,

ESRI ADMIN 2012 now includes the disputed areas inlcuding Aksai Chi and Azad Kashmir and Northern areas  separately rather than being shown as part of the Other countries

it is available here http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=d86e32ea12a64727b9e94d6f820123a2

Khaliq Parkar

unread,
Oct 9, 2014, 9:50:04 PM10/9/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Hi Eric,

I am working in Bihar within Madhubani district.
Could you link me to the block level shapefiles? Do you know anyone who has worked at village\panchayat level divisions?

Thanks!
Khaliq
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
> the Google Groups "datameet" group.
>
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/datameet/X5kzViRMJKs/unsubscribe.
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email
> to datameet+u...@googlegroups.com.
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
>
> --

Sharad Lele

unread,
Oct 11, 2014, 1:49:26 AM10/11/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Khaliq,

I guess after Justin's recent email, he should be in the best position to give you the block boundary shapefiles for Bihar.

Sharad

Khaliq Parkar

unread,
Oct 11, 2014, 1:06:08 PM10/11/14
to data...@googlegroups.com
Thanks!
Got some from Eric which should suffice, but I hope the 2011 data comes through.
...

Antariksh Tyagi

unread,
Jan 6, 2015, 9:22:10 AM1/6/15
to data...@googlegroups.com
On Wednesday, 4 January 2012 09:52:57 UTC+5:30, Karthik Shashidhar wrote:
> All the shapefiles for India that I have downloaded do not show PoK and Aksai Chin as part of India. Does anyone here have access to shapefiles that include these territories? Basically looking to publish (online) some maps, so want to make sure that it's accurate. 
>
>
>
> (I looked through the group archives, and all sources mentioned there do not show these regions as part of India)
>
>
> Thanks
> Karthik

go to this link it has complete india
http://mnre.gov.in/sec/solar-assmnt.htm

D Thakker

unread,
Jan 27, 2015, 3:32:37 AM1/27/15
to data...@googlegroups.com
Eric, in my research / experience i have found that Sub-district, Mandal, Taluka, Tehsil means same and are division of District when it comes to Census.
But for Revenue dept boundaries are drawn and managed by district administrative bodies who report to state administration only.

So for census - District and Sub-district are well defined boundaries, and I understand from 2011 Census India has bought a started numbering system which should make future data reconciliation easier

But for land revenue depaetment - it really depends on the local administrative reach and function, and is managed and controlled by state admin bodies.

For eg. Surat has some discrepancy when it comes to Revenue and Census boundaries. This was something I came across and even local admin bodies in Surat were not aware
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "datameet" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/datameet/X5kzViRMJKs/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to datameet+u...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Democratizing Forest Governance in India
(In press with Oxford University Press India)

Shashank

unread,
Apr 14, 2015, 1:03:16 AM4/14/15
to data...@googlegroups.com
Bumping this up, because I don't think this issue has been resolved yet. I now have 4 different versions of Indian administrative boundaries, and my current nightmare is getting protected area boundaries to line up with them accurately.

What's the best open version of Indian administrative boundaries, down to the Tehsil/Block level, and is there a place from where it is easily available?

(I'm not even going to ask for village-level data, because among other things, what we're doing now is digitising revenue village maps because the MRD itself doesn't have digitised village level data...yet.)

"Sharad Lele [शरच्चंद्र लेले]"

unread,
Apr 14, 2015, 1:11:41 AM4/14/15
to data...@googlegroups.com
Dear Shashank:

I think the bottom line of the thread below was the the IND_adm3 layer is a reasonably good layer for tehsil boundaries.

Regarding digitizing village boundaries: seems like we are all condemned to reinvent the wheel because GoI/Planning Commission/ISRO are not willing to share what they have already done (and in many cases 10 times over).

For which state are you trying to create a village boundary layer?

Sharad

Dipal Thakker

unread,
Apr 14, 2015, 1:40:56 AM4/14/15
to datameet
Shashank, Shashank, and DM comrades

Great if someone can point me to the most complete / recent version of IND_adm3 data. I am working on a census tool and I have done some work for few states, but stuck without detailed boundary data-sets.

I visited BISAG, a nodal agency in Gujarat which I am told has the most detailed GIS data sets for Gujarat and most parts of India, but was booted out on my request to access, lease, license, or rent data set.. its such a shame that on one hand PM/govt is talking about open data and on other there is a thick bureaucratic red tape.

Cheers

| Dipal Thakker

Ma-roof M

unread,
Apr 14, 2015, 2:05:51 AM4/14/15
to data...@googlegroups.com
"I have data, hence I am".

Entities like BISAG, I guess, believe in that. Very difficult to get data out of them. They have also, in an earlier occasion, grapevine says, gone ahead and thwarted attempts by others at creating some data.

____________________________________________________________
Knowledge, that is discovered, lasts a lifetime..

Research Associate, PAS Project
CEPT University
, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, 380009 Gujarat, India

"Sharad Lele [शरच्चंद्र लेले]"

unread,
Apr 14, 2015, 2:17:55 AM4/14/15
to data...@googlegroups.com
Dear Dipal:

http://biogeo.ucdavis.edu/data/gadm2/shp/IND_adm.zip

This is the link for GADM boundaries for india.

Sharad

Nagarajan M

unread,
Apr 14, 2015, 11:34:06 PM4/14/15
to data...@googlegroups.com
@Diapl @Ma-roof    Fully agree. Even i tried the same.

Now looking at creating a GIS based application with whatever open data and shapefiles available for rural development.

With Best Regards,

Nagarajan M,  IAS
District Development Officer
District Panchayat,Sabarkantha
Himatnagar - 383 001
Gujarat
M : 08000 42 8000



"Sharad Lele [शरच्चंद्र लेले]"

unread,
Apr 14, 2015, 11:45:52 PM4/14/15
to data...@googlegroups.com
Dear Nagarajan:

Since you are part of the Gujarat Government, surely you have access to village boundary layers from BISAG or some other source? These layers have been created so many times by different govt projects.

Sharad

Devdatta Tengshe

unread,
Apr 17, 2015, 4:38:29 AM4/17/15
to data...@googlegroups.com
Looks like I missed the activity on this post.

The best source for this dataset is the data collected and released by Justin Mayers in August Last year: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/datameet/GJKMXXSB-Ns/fS7HM_xzM3EJ

@Nisha, Should I write a summary post on this as you had suggested?

Regards,
Dev

Dipal Thakker

unread,
Apr 17, 2015, 5:44:48 AM4/17/15
to datameet
@Nagarajan - it will be grate if you can share more about your application, and keen to collaborate too.


| Dipal Thakker


Dipal Thakker

unread,
Apr 17, 2015, 5:52:51 AM4/17/15
to datameet
@Dev - thanks for the link. Will look at the data now. Also anything which can allow people to collaborate more will be very helpful.. so pls feel free to share, suggest, advice.


| Dipal Thakker

Nagarajan M

unread,
Apr 17, 2015, 6:28:50 AM4/17/15