New content: "Elevator Pitch for Museums" for your review and comments
10 views
Skip to first unread message
Daniel
May 10, 2010, 6:37:14 AM5/10/10
to Data Incubator
Dear colleagues,
at http://groups.google.com/group/dataincubator/web/elevator-pitch-for-museums
I started to put together arguments to motivate a museum to publish
their asset data as Linked Data.
This is based on the recent discussion about the Montigliani test and
my interest to get a better solution (by involving museums directly in
this conversation).
I plan to approach a group of public museums here in Bavaria with
this: as I want to approach the head of the museum, it contains nearly
no technical arguments and only arguments, which provide concrete
value-add or reduced effort for museums.
I think we have to motivate the heads first in order to get support on
lower levels of the organization e.g. the IT people.
I would like to invite you to give feedback, review and additional
content to the document.
(You will find that many arguments can be used to argue in favor of
open data in general - however I would like to keep it focused on the
business of museums.)
In case anybody of you has museum background or knows somebody with
this background, I would be happy if you could forward this email.
Kind regards,
Daniel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Data Incubator" group.
To post to this group, send email to datain...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to dataincubato...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dataincubator?hl=en.
at http://groups.google.com/group/dataincubator/web/elevator-pitch-for-museums
I started to put together arguments to motivate a museum to publish
their asset data as Linked Data.
This is based on the recent discussion about the Montigliani test and
my interest to get a better solution (by involving museums directly in
this conversation).
I plan to approach a group of public museums here in Bavaria with
this: as I want to approach the head of the museum, it contains nearly
no technical arguments and only arguments, which provide concrete
value-add or reduced effort for museums.
I think we have to motivate the heads first in order to get support on
lower levels of the organization e.g. the IT people.
I would like to invite you to give feedback, review and additional
content to the document.
(You will find that many arguments can be used to argue in favor of
open data in general - however I would like to keep it focused on the
business of museums.)
In case anybody of you has museum background or knows somebody with
this background, I would be happy if you could forward this email.
Kind regards,
Daniel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Data Incubator" group.
To post to this group, send email to datain...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to dataincubato...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dataincubator?hl=en.
Ian Davis
May 13, 2010, 4:26:34 AM5/13/10
to datain...@googlegroups.com
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Daniel <dako...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> at http://groups.google.com/group/dataincubator/web/elevator-pitch-for-museums
> I started to put together arguments to motivate a museum to publish
> their asset data as Linked Data.
>
This is a great idea! I will have a read and share my thoughts with the list.
Ian
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Daniel <dako...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> at http://groups.google.com/group/dataincubator/web/elevator-pitch-for-museums
> I started to put together arguments to motivate a museum to publish
> their asset data as Linked Data.
>
Ian
Ross Singer
May 19, 2010, 12:15:05 AM5/19/10
to datain...@googlegroups.com
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages