Dear DART team,
I am currently running multiple simulations using DART on a voxelized forest scene and would like to optimize the computation time.
I would appreciate it if you could review the settings I am using. I am not fully confident in my understanding of all DART parameters, and I am unsure whether relying on the default settings is appropriate for my use case.
At present, I have:
My objective is to run a large number of simulations at different times. In this context, I would like to know whether using the sequencer could help reduce computation time or improve efficiency.
Thank you in advance for your guidance.
Kind regards,
Anne Baranger
Dear Anne,
I am going to analyze your simulation and will let you know. I plan to improve your DART-FT (discrete ordinate method) simulation and will create a DART simulation (Monte Carlo). Hopefully, DART will be more efficient than DART-FT for simulating the radiative budget of your forest.
Concerning PyTools4DART, I have added 2 persons to this Email:
- Florian de Boissieu (florian.d...@inrae.fr): the daddy of Pytools4dart
- Yasmine Karray (ykar...@gmail.com): PhD student at CESBIO (France) and Sfax (Tunisia). She is using quite a lot Pytools4DART with the latest DART version.
Because DART is continuously improving, at time some inconsistency can appear between DART and Pytools4DART. I remember Yasmine met such an issue and solved it. I advise you to try the DART latest version (https://sdrive.cnrs.fr/s/t9fWMnqC5QHAeW3) and to let know Yasmine and Florian your issue with Pytools4DART, if there is still an issue.