Walgreens Photo Studio Software Download
Jemima Babicke
Had an annoying experience at a Walgreens photo center today. I uploaded a picture of my kids to the Walgreens website I took at home using a new background I bought. It was just using a single bounced flash (Canon 20D + 580EX + Stofen Omnibounce) as you can tell by the shadow on the background. I got to the store to pick up the 8x10 print and they said they cancelled the order because they are not allowed to print professional photos ! I tried convincing them that it's just at my home using a make shift studio but they wouldn't listen. They said some other stores like Walmart and Kinkos have been sued by studios for printing their photos.
Had an annoying experience at a Walgreens photo center today. I
uploaded a picture of my kids to the Walgreens website I took at
home using a new background I bought. It was just using a single
bounced flash (Canon 20D + 580EX + Stofen Omnibounce) as you can
tell by the shadow on the background. I got to the store to pick up
the 8x10 print and they said they cancelled the order because they
are not allowed to print professional photos ! I tried convincing
them that it's just at my home using a make shift studio but they
wouldn't listen. They said some other stores like Walmart and
Kinkos have been sued by studios for printing their photos.
They said if I proved to them that it's not a professional photo
they'll print it.
Here is the picture I was trying to print:
That would only "prove" the kids are his/hers, not that he/she is the photographer. I'd take the camera in with the file on the CF card. If that doesn't work, I'd then go to a different store - perhaps a true photography store that does prints.
That would only "prove" the kids are his/hers, not that he/she is
the photographer. I'd take the camera in with the file on the CF
card. If that doesn't work, I'd then go to a different store -
perhaps a true photography store that does prints.
The only question here is whether you own the right to print the photo. Professionally done or not is not the issue here, as you are allowed to print the photos you own. Many of my clients buy my digital original packages, and they are allowed to make prints as stated on their contracts.
Lomography's LomoChrome '92 is designed to mimic the look of classic drugstore film that used to fill family photo albums. As we discovered, to shoot with it is to embrace the unexpected, from strange color shifts to odd textures and oversized grain.
The LowePro PhotoSport Outdoor is a camera pack for photographers who also need a well-designed daypack for hiking and other outdoor use. If that sounds like you, the PhotoSport Outdoor may be a great choice, but as with any hybrid product, there are a few tradeoffs.
If you want a compact camera that produces great quality photos without the hassle of changing lenses, there are plenty of choices available for every budget. Read on to find out which portable enthusiast compacts are our favorites.
We are extremely pleased to announce one of our leading integrations has launched a new application for photo collages. Photo Collage Portrait Studio by MEA Mobile, now available on the Apple App Store.
We hope all this information is a nice breath of fresh air as we hit spring forward! Check back later for more information, and as always, if you have any comments, questions, and/or concerns please send an email to: apib...@walgreens.com
> We just had our vacation pictures printed at Walgreens and
> they did a great job on the prints but the CD is useless. It
> will not play under OSX 10.5.4 or Parallels. I put it in our
> Sony HD DVD player and it played a cool slide show of 28
> of the 350 pictures. Mac users should not use the Walgreens
> photo system and it is not Mac compatible.
> will not play under OSX 10.5.4 or Parallels. I put it in our
> Sony HD DVD player and it played a cool slide show of 28
> of the 350 pictures. Mac users should not use the Walgreens
> photo system and it is not Mac compatible.
I think you should let Walgreens know they have a problem. Perhaps they
can read their "defective" CD and transfer the photos to a good one (or
to your thumb drive). If they can't read it, they may need to re-scan
your negatives.Fred
> That's probably a good thing. "plays a cool slideshow"
> means that there was *software* on that disc. I don't
> know about you, but I don't want Walgreens' software.
> I just want my photos.
DVD players have a programable menu system. That's why when you
leave some DVD's at the main menu things change. They just included
a programable menu that displays the first photo, waits a few seconds
displays the second and so on.Try playing it on VLC using the play DVD with menus option.Most DVD players will play a CD as if it were a DVD if it has the
files in the same format as a DVD. UDF file system, a directory
called "VIDEO_TS" (uppercase only) and so on.....Geoff.--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel g...@mendelson.com N3OWJ/4X1GM
The Walgreens response was we do not support Macintosh and the reason
the CD will not play on your Sony DVD player must be something wrong
with the Sony player. They don't really careI have the pictures on my Canon 2 GB SD card and now have all 356 photos
imported to iPhoto.
> In article
> ,
> aRKay wrote:
>
> > I have the pictures on my Canon 2 GB SD card and now have all 356 photos
> > imported to iPhoto.
>
> I would have just done that to begin with. : )
> > > I have the pictures on my Canon 2 GB SD card and now have all 356 photos
> > > imported to iPhoto.
> >
> > I would have just done that to begin with. : )
>
> Walgreens did a great job on the 356 prints but their CD sucks big tim
> aRKay wrote:
>
> > > > I have the pictures on my Canon 2 GB SD card and now have all 356 photos
> > > > imported to iPhoto.
> > >
> > > I would have just done that to begin with. : )
> >
> > Walgreens did a great job on the 356 prints but their CD sucks big tim
>
> Since you have a digital camera, I'm wondering, and I imagine others
> are, too, why you had Walgreens make a CD in the first place. Prints,
> sure, that makes perfect sense, but a CD?
Nothing in the original post suggested to me that there was a digital
camera involved--but that's my mindset because, in the 21st century it
would never occur to me to take my digital photos to a store to get
them printed. Especially 356 of them. OP must be one hell of a good
photographer to take that many good photos on a vacation! Since I'm not
in the same league as OP, I select one or two photos (at most) from a
shoot and print them myself. More likely I print none. I post the
photos that I deem worthy at . My
wife likes to print one for the fridge door once in a while, but we
soon tire of looking at it and toss it in the trash.What does one do with 356 vacation photos, anyway? Favor the neighbors
with a showing? Make Grandma or the siblings look at them? Go over them
with the kids like flash cards to teach then to quickly name every
location? I don't care how good the photographer, if he brings 356
photos to show me, the second time I see him coming I'll lock the doors
and draw the shades!
> aRKay wrote:
>
> > Because it was only $2 to save my 356 photos to a CD.
>
> That's about $1.90 more than it would cost you to do the same thing.
>
> > It was cheap but OSX cannot read the CD.
>
> You keep saying that, but you've also said it's no good in Windows,
> either, and it only displayed 28 of the photos in your DVD player, so it
> sounds like you got a defective disc, period.
> aRKay writes:
>
> > will not play under OSX 10.5.4 or Parallels. I put it in our
> > Sony HD DVD player and it played a cool slide show of 28
> > of the 350 pictures. Mac users should not use the Walgreens
> > photo system and it is not Mac compatible.
>
> That's probably a good thing. "plays a cool slideshow"
> means that there was *software* on that disc.