the spaceship moon theory

[Matt Beal]

I have no idea how they would accomplish such an awesome task, but I think it's reasonable to assume from all the available evidence that there are alien beings with far more advanced technology than anything that's ever been publicly disclosed to Earthlings.

 

And if our moon is not an artificial satellite of some sort, why is it hollow, and why does it rotate in such a way that one side always faces the Earth and the other side cannot be observed from Earth? Could it be that whoever launched the Moon into its orbit around the Earth doesn't want us to see them?

 

Another strange thing, the moon is just the right distance from the Earth that it completely blocks out the sun during an eclipse. According to the famed science fiction writer Isaac Asimov, who was a professor of biochemistry at Boston University, "There is no astronomical reason why the moon and the sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion." (Alien Agenda, p.13)

 

Don Wilson wrote an interesting book titled "Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon," published in 1975. It addresses the evidence that the moon is anything but a natural celestial body.

 

Also, legends and sacred writings across the world indicate that the moon was once much closer to the Earth. (Alien Agenda, p.17)

 

Not to mention all the strange artifacts on the moon, some of which were described in a Washington Post front-page article published on Nov. 22, 1966, headlined, "Six Mysterious Statuesque Shadows Photographed on the Moon by Orbiter."

 

It's all in that opening chapter of Alien Agenda, available at most public libraries. I recommend the book to anyone who thinks something is fishy about all this.

---

From: "semaj...@aol.com" <semaj...@aol.com>
To: palom...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, April 7, 2010 4:59:51 PM
Subject: Re: the hollow moon

interesting but our moon is a little bit bigger than 15 miles in size, 2 questions i would pose to such a radical theory. 1 how would you control the flight path of something so large? and 2 a really good set of breaks would be needed to park the thing in its relative orbit as well as a radar system far more advanced than we are able to produce or conceive to avoid comets and other objects!

i guess it is possible but its a very very radical idea! and i just couldn't see it being a possibility of our moon being able to park in its orbit without causing some sort of damage to the earth...lets face it, this is a little different to parking your family saloon at the local multi story int it!

the common sense approach if you was heading to earth from outside the known system is to park on the nearest uninhabitable planet that has a workable temperature to reach earth from. you would travel in and on the rock like moon then park safely, who cares if you burn off mars's atmosphere its non inhabitable and earth is your target it has by far a huge amount of usable resources that the other planets in our system simply don't and you wouldn't want to risk burning off earths atmosphere as simply you would lose everything you travelled here for! so travelling the millions of miles from where ever in the rock you then take the relavely small trip from the now moon of mar's to earth!

its the most logical aproach to this!

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Beal <palom...@yahoo.com>
To: dark-star...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, Apr 7, 2010 9:28 pm
Subject: the hollow moon

Speaking of hollow moons, there's lots of evidence that our own Moon is hollow. See the opening chapter of "Alien Agenda" by Jim Marrs, titled "The Greatest UFO?"

 

And how about the way our Moon always faces the Earth? Does any other allegedly natural celestial satellite behave in this same way? That chapter is loaded with interesting facts about our Moon. 

 

Also, according to "Worlds in Collision" by Immanuel Velikovsky, there was time in recorded history when the Moon was simply not there. It's just possible our Moon is a space ship, parked in space by a race of advanced alien beings so they can use it as a space station and surveillance post.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dark Star Planet X" group.
To post to this group, send email to dark-star...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to dark-star-plane...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dark-star-planet-x?hl=en.

[stuttermonkey]

The moon always faces the earth because it is tidally locked -- this
happens when a satellite is either large enough or close enough to an
astronomical body to stop whatever rotation it may have once had, or
might otherwise have if smaller or further away from the astronomical
body. For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_locking

[palomine]

As far as the "tidal locking" theory is concerned, why is our moon the
only known satellite in the universe that is subject to this
phenomenon? If there is another one, please tell us all about it. We'd
love to know.

Contrary to what Wikipedia would have you believe, there's actually a
lot of evidence to suggest the moon is hollow. I did a search for
Hollow Moon Theory, and here are some excerpts from what I found:

In "Moongate: Suppressed Findings of The US Space Program" (1982),
nuclear engineer and researcher/writer William L. Brian II presents
evidence suggesting that the moon, as any hollow sphere would, "rings"
when hit by asteroids or heavy space junk. And that's not all.
According to Dr. Brian, "the evidence provided by Apollo seismic
experiments also points to the conclusion that the moon is hollow and
relatively rigid."

Research/Writer Don Wilson presents other well-documented evidence
supporting the Hollow Moon Theory.

"The moon has only 60 percent of the density of Earth. The improbable
fact that an equal amount of earth material seemed to weigh almost
twice as much as moon matter mystified everyone. Why the difference?
The actual answer, some scientists felt, pointed to the possibility
that part or all of the moon's interior was hollow!"

Then there's a report in the July 1962 issue of Astronautics by Dr.
Gordon McDonald, a leading scientist at the Nation Aeronautics and
Space Administration in which he states that "according to an analysis
of the moon's motion, it appears that the moon is hollow: if the
astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that
the interior of the moon is less dense than the outer parts. Indeed,
it would seem that the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous
sphere.’"

In 1959 eminent scientist Professor Iosif Shklovsky put forth his
findings in relation to the "moons" circling Mars. "After carefully
weighing up the evidence he concludes that they are both hollow"

There's lots more here:

http://bibliotecapleyades.net/luna/esp_luna_19.htm

On Apr 7, 11:01 pm, stuttermonkey <shad.boll...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The moon always faces the earth because it is tidally locked -- this
> happens when a satellite is either large enough or close enough to an
> astronomical body to stop whatever rotation it may have once had, or
> might otherwise have if smaller or further away from the astronomical

> body. For more information, seehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_locking

>
> On Apr 7, 3:16 pm, Matt Beal <palomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>

> > And if our moon is not an artificial satellite of some sort, why is it hollow, and why does it rotate in such a way that one side always faces the Earth and the other side cannot be observed from Earth? Could it be that whoever launched the Moon into its orbit around the Earth doesn't want us to see them?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

[yari...@juno.com]

" Could it be that whoever launched the Moon into its orbit around the Earth doesn't want us to see them?"

While the Moon's rotation is explained by 'tidal lock', there is reason to believe that there is artifacts on the Moon near its limb and on its 'back side'. 

http://www.yaridanjo.warmkessel.com/Galactic.html

EXTRATERRESTRIAL SENTIENT LIFE IN THE GALAXY

(caution, end note numbers do not match.

1. Remains of ancient mining operations on the far side of the Moon have been reported by Yarbro . These do not appear to be related to current alien activities. Even more interesting is the presence of two currently active alien communications intercept sites on the Moon's far side recording activity in our solar system.
   
2. One of these communication intercept stations appears to be operated by the Denaerde aliens. They may have even tried to communicate with us by radio as early as 1924.
   
3. Marconi, in mid December 1901, made his first successful attempt at intercontinental radio transmissions between Europe and America. His first transmission was an encoded S and V letter transmitted by a crude form of HF using ionospheric bounce techniques. Amazingly, his transmission was reacquired once again in August 1924 (22.6 years later), but with some unusual data added. These signals were examined at the Naval Observatory which recorded the detected signals on photographic film (Robert Jackson; U. F. O. s; Quintet Publishing Limited, 6 Blundell Street, London N7 9BH;1992; pg. 71). The data was displayed in a falling raster format with the raster rate locked to the encoded letter. When the film was developed, the additional data formed the image of a crude face.
   
   Imagine the following scenario. Marconi's signal was intercepted on the Moon. The Moon is only a hundred times more distant than Marconi's primitive receivers. These signals were relayed to 61 Cygni, 11.2 light years distant. Did the Denaerde aliens copy the transmission, modify it and relay it back to the Moon where it was rebroadcast to the Earth? Was this the signal analyzed at the Observatory 22.4 years later? Did this incident mark the United States Navy's first recognition of an extra-terrestrial civilization?
   
   The Denaerde aliens seem willing to share information with humanity. This initial form of radio contact is entirely consistent with their behavior (see Chapters 11 and 12).
   
   Clouding this analysis are the short wave transmission experiments carried out in 1924 at the newly formed Naval Research Laboratory . Very short pulsed Morse "E" signals were stretched by ionospheric bounces and appeared like "T"s (but both the dots and dashes would be streched, and why could not one still distinguish one from another?). (Ed Lyon; THE MILITARY ROLE IN EARLY RADIO; Mid-Atlantic Radio Club, Labstracts, The Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Ovelook Avenue, SW, Washington D. C.; 13 September, 1993; pp 4 - 7.) These two stories, one from the Naval Observatory and the other from the Naval Research Laboratories, published within a year of one another (and within two months after the author talked to a long time employee of the Naval Research Laboratories) are suspiciously time co-incident. Further, the latter's analysis appears poorly supported and raises the question as to if one was conveniently published after the other for some other purpose than historical information.
   

Of course, the Naval Research Laboratory article appeared shortly after we talked to one of its senior employees about this possibility.  We smiled.

http://www.barry.warmkessel.com/9related.html#c

COMMENTS ABOUT ALIENS

VIDEO - NASA AIRBRUSHED UFOS/LUNAR BASE ON BACK SIDE OF MOON

etc. Also see photos and Yarbro text images

My server has been running slow, but is finally up.

 

____________________________________________________________
Penny Stock Jumping 2000%
Sign up to the #1 voted penny stock newsletter for free today!
AwesomePennyStocks.com

[TPF...@aol.com]

For those interested, as I am, in the anomalies of our moon, highly recommend Who Built the Moon by Christopher Knight.  Too many mathematical coincidences for it to be natural.  Longtime member; first post.

 

Warren

--

[stuttermonkey]

I'm not an artificial-moon or artifacts-on-the-moon debunker (those
thing *could* be true), but I do understand what tidal locking means.
From Wikipedia's page and my own geophysical background, tidal locking
in astronomical bodies is incredibly common -- especially in our own
solar system.

From Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_locking): "Most
significant moons in the Solar System are tidally locked with their
primaries, since they orbit very closely and tidal force increases
rapidly (as a cubic) with decreasing distance. Notable exceptions are
the irregular outer satellites of the gas giant planets, which orbit
much farther away than the large well-known moons."

Where the "artificialness" of the moon is concerned, the fact that it
is tidally locked with the Earth is not a valid argument. Opponents
will pick this fact from your argument (rightfully so) and hammer on
it regardless of any other truths that lend credence to an artificial
moon theory.

On Apr 7, 8:59 pm, palomine <palomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> As far as the "tidal locking" theory is concerned, why is our moon the
> only known satellite in the universe that is subject to this
> phenomenon? If there is another one, please tell us all about it. We'd
> love to know.
>

[Andy Z]

I agree with Shad - his point is well made.  There are some very odd anomalies about the Moon, but tidal locking isn't one of them.  What particularly interests me at the moment is whether large bodies of water ice lie underneath the lunar surface, particularly at the poles.  It's almost certain to be the case with Mars.  It would be very exciting if it was true with the Moon too.  Recent discoveries discussed on this board have highlighted NASA's remarkable lack of understanding about the lunar structure, despite 40 years of accumulated data from various sources.

Many thanks,

Andy Lloyd

Author of "The Dark Star"(2005), "Ezekiel One" (2009) and "The Followers of Horus" (2010) 
published by Timeless Voyager Press

'The Dark Star Theory'
http://www.darkstar1.co.uk

'Cheltenham-Art.com'
http://cheltenham-art.com

'The Gardens Gallery'
http://www.gardensgallery.co.uk

http://www.myspace.com/andydarkstar

http://www.modelmayhem.com/member.php?id=440880



 
> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:33:05 -0700
> Subject: Re: the spaceship moon theory
> From: shad.b...@gmail.com
> To: dark-star...@googlegroups.com

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dark Star Planet X" group.
> To post to this group, send email to dark-star...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to dark-star-plane...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dark-star-planet-x?hl=en.
>

---

Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now.