Our Universe Collided with Another Billions of Years Ago, Stephen Hawking States

9 views
Skip to first unread message

mk23666

unread,
May 20, 2013, 7:15:49 PM5/20/13
to dark-star...@googlegroups.com

Our Universe Collided with Another Billions of Years Ago, Stephen Hawking States

January 8, 2012 by Range

Space

Universe Collide

While it’s a well-known fact that there’s an upcoming Andromeda-Milky Way collision in 3 to 5 billion years, Stephen Hawking has stated that we should look to a collision between universes in the distant past of our own universe for explanations of why physical constants seem so fine-tuned to the values required for life to exist.

Stephen Hawking thinks that the best way to see this is to further develop M-theory, an extension of string theory. M-theory predicts many different universes, with different values for the physical constants that we take for granted for. A way to check for evidence of the many different universes is to look for features in the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), which could show that our universe collided with another universe billions of years ago.

The circular patterns within the cosmic microwave background seem to indicate that space and time did not come into being at the Big Bang, but that our own universe continually cycles through a series of “aeons”, states University of Oxford theoretical physicist Roger Penrose, who believes that the data collected by NASA’s WMAP satellite supports his theory of conformal cyclic cosmology.

Stephen Hawking States that Our Universe Collided with Another

Penrose made this claim after having analyzed maps from the Wilkinson Anisotropy Probe, which reveal that the cosmic microwave background may have been created just 300,000 years after the Big Bang, thus offering an insight to the conditions at that time. This counters the traditional model which has become accepted, that the universe rapidly expanded for a short time before settling to a slower rate of expansion. This model does not account for the very low entropy state in which our universe was born. Penrose believes that the Big Bang was just one of many Big Bangs, which each marking the beginning of a new “aeon” in the history of the universe.

According to Penrose and Vahe Gurzadyn of the Yerevan Physics Institute in Armenia, the concentric circles allow us to see through the Big Bang in the aeon to the one that might have existed beforehand. There is a visible signature left in our aeon by the spherical ripples of gravitational waves that were generated when black holes collided in the previous aeon.

This theory is not without critics, because it states that the distribution of temperature variations across the sky should be Gaussian, or random, rather than having discernible structures hidden within it.  Another problem which arises, and since it’s central to the theory, it’s quite important, is that all particles will become massless in the very distant future. However, there’s no evidence that electrons decay in that fashion.

[via The Daily Galaxy]

wayne james

unread,
May 21, 2013, 3:08:31 AM5/21/13
to Mark Keller, dark-star...@googlegroups.com
well well well, now that's hawkins doing what hes supposed to be doing lol,  welcome to the world of enlightenment mr hawkins. glad to see somebody in mainline throwing down the towl! 

string theory sucks so bad though its the only theory that presumes a 2 dimensional shape is 1 dimensional in maths, witch should really go on the funnies page.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dark Star Planet X" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dark-star-plane...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to dark-star...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dark-star-planet-x?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Alan Cornette

unread,
May 21, 2013, 7:59:49 AM5/21/13
to semaj...@googlemail.com, dark-star-planet-x
String theory doesn't even qualify as myth - like several other 'theories' in the present cosmology camp.

wayne james

unread,
May 21, 2013, 8:16:24 AM5/21/13
to Alan Cornette, dark-star...@googlegroups.com
lol, i agree al.

A lot of what hawkins has done is pretty good, he may not hit the button all the time but i give him credit, hes not far off and hes not afraid to go against the grain as to speak. hes looking for the answers like all of us and he puts it on table for all to see, a true man of science.

his tiny blackholes are not far off the truth either but he knows that (im betting).

Lee

unread,
May 21, 2013, 8:56:20 AM5/21/13
to semaj...@googlemail.com, Alan Cornette, dark-star...@googlegroups.com
I'll take Sitchin's theories over Hawking's anytime!--Lee

wayne james

unread,
May 21, 2013, 9:11:27 AM5/21/13
to Lee, dark-star...@googlegroups.com
aha agreed


On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, wayne james <semaj...@googlemail.com> wrote:
aha agreed 

Alan Cornette

unread,
May 21, 2013, 1:13:58 PM5/21/13
to semaj...@googlemail.com, dark-star-planet-x
Sitchin was a journalist and on one of his book's dust jacket he said that he "was only reporting what he had read." He did personally interpret many of these records of course, but he gave us the basics. What better solution for understanding the big picture than to take seriously what ancient historians has recorded on stone and clay - and in buildings such as the Great Pyramid. And the only dependable way to preserve this information in times of great earth changes was to record on baked clay tablets that would last for thousands of years. They knew delicate records would not survive. Al
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages