Re: PIL to exclude Chamar, Mala, Mahar, Dusad, Pasi and Dhobi communities from the list of Scheduled Castes

[Chakradhar Hadke]

--- On Wed, 31/8/11, Rahul Gajbhiye <drgajb...@gmail.com> wrote: From: Rahul Gajbhiye <drgajb...@gmail.com> Subject: PIL to exclude Chamar, Mala, Mahar, Dusad, Pasi and Dhobi communities from the list of Scheduled Castes To: Date: Wednesday, 31 August, 2011, 10:10 PM Dear All, Jai Bheem!  I am sure you are aware about the recent PIL to exclude Chamar, Mala, Mahar,  Dusad, Pasi and Dhobi communities from the list of Scheduled Castes and bring creamy layer in SC ST. I am forwarding you the news appeared in The Hindu and Times of India. we need to understand the conspiracy behind this PIL and take appropriate legal measures immediately.  Regards  Dr Rahul Gajbhiye  SC seeks Centre's stand on dalit creamy layer Aug 24, 2011, 12.32AM IST TNN[ Dhananjay Mahapatra ] NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notice to the Union government on a PIL seeking exclusion of 5-10 communities from the Scheduled Castes and Tribes list complaining that they were the creamy layer who cornered 99% of quota meant for advancement of 1,677 other dalit castes and tribes. A bench of Justices R V Raveendran and A K Patnaik sought responses of the Centre and states to the PIL by O P Shukla, who belongs to Balmiki community and is a former judicial member of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Shukla sought a direction to the governments to implement recommendations of various committees to exclude Chamar, Mala, Mahar, Meena, Dusad, Pasi and Dhobi communities from the list of Scheduled Castes and work out a new reservation policy. "A select 5-10 castes/tribes among the target group have become financially so strong to be compared with higher castes of society. Therefore, further empowering them by way of giving them continued and further reservation will amount to unjust enrichment and will amount to violation of constitutional provisions," he said. Shukla requested the court to direct the government to review and revise the reservation policy to give benefits starting from the communities languishing at the lowest strata among the SCs and STs. "Only 1% powerful castes among SCs and STs are cornering the benefits and the 99% deserving communities of neglected sections of SCs and STs are being deprived," he said. The present reservation policy had failed to protect the constitutional rights of people belonging to 1,091 SC communities and 586 ST groups, he said. "Periodical extension of the blanket reservation policy after every 10 years is unconstitutional and even against the spirit of the Constitution as it was never envisaged to allow socially advanced communities within the SCs and STs to corner the entire benefits of reservation," the petitioner said.  News in The Hindu  Notice to Centre, States on PIL against blanket quota The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notice to the Centre and all States and the Union Territories of Chandigarh and Puducherry on a public interest litigation petition seeking a direction for review of the reservation policy. “Fraud” on Constitution Petitioner O.P. Shukla, president of the National Coordination Committee for Revision of Reservation Policy, said the policy that had been in force for the last 62 years was lopsided and only fewer groups were getting the benefits. They became advanced in literacy and economic growth, and gained political and financial affluence. Their continuing to get the benefits of reservation was a “fraud on the Constitution and also on citizens. This has resulted in total violation of Articles 14, 15 and16.” The time had come to abolish the blanket reservation policy and evolve a new mechanism to uplift and empower the really marginalised sections. . Mr. Shukla said he had been working for the uplift of sweepers and scavengers and extremely backward communities for the last 35 years. The Coordination Committee, in association with various social organisations, had been working for a review of the schedule under Articles 341 and 342 and for implementation of the recommendations of the Lokur Committee-1965 and exclusion of advanced and affluent castes/tribes among the SCs and the STs from the reservation policy. For, the benefits had not percolated down to the genuine and deserving during the last 62 years. “Consequently the basic purpose of affirmative action as envisaged by the framers of the Constitution has been defeated.” A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik issued the notice after hearing senior counsel R. Venkataramani and counsel Balaji Srinivasan for the petitioner.

[rhiwale]

It is just a PIL.

You can file another PIL

---

From: Chakradhar Hadke <hadk...@yahoo.co.in>
To: Ram Mirke <ram_m...@rediffmail.com>
Cc: Chakradhar Hadke <hadk...@yahoo.co.in>; AT Jadhav <atja...@yahoo.com>; Vijay More <ngov...@gmail.com>; Santoshkumar Darokar <santoshku...@gmail.com>; B. Haribabu <bhaskar....@gmail.com>; mulnivasi Bahujans <mulnivas...@googlegroups.com>; Bodhisatva Group <Bodhisat...@yahoogroups.com>; sakyagroup yahoogroups <sakya...@yahoogroups.com>; Anil Bhawate <anil_b...@yahoo.com>; Prem Chumber <babasa...@yahoo.com>; kavita nirmalawaman <adv.ka...@gmail.com>; Bahujan Student <bahujanst...@gmail.com>; Prashat Tambe <pash...@gmail.com>; Sanjay Samant <sanjaysa...@yahoo.co.in>; Sandip Sandip <patil_s...@yahoo.com>; Indumati Wankhede <indumati...@gmail.com>; Amol Waman <amoln...@gmail.com>; Abhay Shrung <abhay...@gmail.com>; PL Bhangu <plbh...@gmail.com>; Sukh Pal <sp74...@gmail.com>; Dinesh Sant <dinesh_...@yahoo.co.in>; Chakradhar H <chakr...@facebook.com>; SIDDHARTH KAMBLE <drsiddha...@gmail.com>; Vinaya Rakkhita <vinayar...@yahoo.co.in>; uttam vaidya <uttams...@yahoo.co.in>; Uplift Them <uplif...@gmail.com>; Udit Raj <scstconfeder...@googlegroups.com>; Khajan Singh <khajan...@uti.co.in>; TW Ingle <twing...@yahoo.co.in>; Thousand Sunshine <thousand...@gmail.com>; Sunil Khobragade <srk_b...@yahoo.co.in>; SP Ashok <spas...@gmail.com>; sumedh shende <sumedh...@hotmail.com>; Prashant D. Rahulkar <prashant...@yahoo.co.in>; Darshan Loach <darsha...@gmail.com>; Anant Maringanti <anan...@gmail.com>; Deva Fulzele <deven_...@rediffmail.com>; Mahendra Kumar <kmmr...@gmail.com>; Sanjeet Baudh <sanje...@yahoo.com>; SB Gawai <dhamma...@rediffmail.com>; Shrikant Ganvir <ganvir_...@rediffmail.com>; Hardan Singh <hsingh...@gmail.com>; Archana Dongre <darch...@gmail.com>; Vibhawari Kamble <sawa...@gmail.com>; DrMilind Jiwane <milindjiw...@yahoo.co.in>; Jayant Rangari <rangari...@yahoo.com>; abhay m dongre <abhay...@rediffmail.com>; Arun Dongre <arundo...@yahoo.com>; Ajay Dhoke <ajay...@yahoo.com>; Karthik Navayan <dalit-movemen...@googlegroups.com>; Dinesh Kamble <kamble_d...@rediffmail.com>; Pravin Khobragade <pkhob...@gmail.com>; Dr.Deepak Raut <drdeep...@gmail.com>; Buddhist League <buddhis...@gmail.com>; P.P. Lakshman <pplaks...@gmail.com>; Tyade yb <ybt...@rediffmail.com>; Sachin Sarate <sach...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 2:17 PM
Subject: [D.M.A.-:1301] Re: PIL to exclude Chamar, Mala, Mahar, Dusad, Pasi and Dhobi communities from the list of Scheduled Castes

--
====================================================
For more options, visit this group & blogs at
http://dalit-movement-association.blogspot.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To post this group, send email to
dalit-movemen...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe visit this link & unjoin
dalit-movement-asso...@googlegroups.com
=====================================================

[etio]

PIL against a PIL?

[Feroze Mithiborwala]

JAI BHAI - LETS NOT TAKE THIS PIL LIGHTLY

NEED TO HAVE A STRATEGY HERE & WE HAVE TO PLAN IT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

DO CALL ME

FEROZE

PHULE-AMBEDKARI VICHAR MANCH - MUMBAI

9820897517

--

====================================================
For more options, visit this group & blogs at
http://dalit-movement-association.blogspot.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To post this group, send email to
dalit-movemen...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe visit this link & unjoin
dalit-movement-asso...@googlegroups.com
=====================================================

--
Feroze Mithiborwala

[avinash sukhdeve]

we the members of peoples democratic movement Nagpur requested to the all like minded peoples to oppose the aforesaid P.I.L.' we don't know petitioner shri. O.P Shukla.how can he imagine the development of the caste which he requested to exclude from S.C. list. please intimate us the details of shri.O.P Shukala

yours

avi sukhdeve