We have very detailed measurements of biopore size distributions (diameter and frequency) at different soil depths, together with soil texture and hydraulic parameter estimations, but no field observations of soil water level or tile drain discharge.
Now we run into these problems:
1. The model with biopore module stopped running with error message “../geometry1d.C:109: assertion 'bottom < top' failed in add_soil (error)”.
And the time when error starts seems to be sensitive to the depth where the biopore ends. Is it due to the numerical instability? How can I solve it?
2. How to parameter biopore module with the measurements we have? Is it possible or necessary to include diameter and frequency at different depths?
3. When running soil profiles without macropore or biopore component, we still see in the soil_water.dll file that there are water exchange between matrix and biopores.
I attached the daisy file for soil input that includes biopore module.
If needed I will send a report describing the Daisy model set up and other input files.
Cheers,
Lan
--------------------------------
Post doc, Ph.D.
Department of Bioscience
Faculty of Science and Technology
Aarhus University
Vejlsøvej 25, P.O. Box 314
8600 Silkeborg, Denmark
Tel: +45 871 58407
2.
Now we run into these problems:
1. The model with biopore module stopped running with error message “../geometry1d.C:109: assertion 'bottom < top' failed in add_soil (error)”.
And the time when error starts seems to be sensitive to the depth where the biopore ends. Is it due to the numerical instability? How can I solve it?
2. How to parameter biopore module with the measurements we have? Is it possible or necessary to include diameter and frequency at different depths?
3. When running soil profiles without macropore or biopore component, we still see in the soil_water.dll file that there are water exchange between matrix and biopores.