With this series of updates, WOLA seeks to cover the most important developments at the U.S.-Mexico border. See past updates here.
Your donation to WOLA is crucial to keeping these paywall-free and ad-free Updates going. Please contribute now and support our work.
THIS WEEK IN BRIEF:
THE FULL UPDATE:
Bloomberg reporters Fola Akinnibi and Sophie Alexander revealed that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is pursuing a “plan to use as many as 23 warehouses for detaining thousands of immigrants arrested by federal agents” all around the United States. Flush with $45 billion in funding for detention from the “One Big Beautiful Bill” that Congress’s Republican majority passed in July 2025, the agency is purchasing large indoor spaces that, in many cases, were originally “designed and marketed as e-commerce distribution facilities.”
Examples of purchases, which cover just the land and empty buildings, include:
“ICE still has to pay companies to outfit the buildings with toilets, showers, beds, dining and recreation areas, and then run them as detention centers,” Akinnibi and Alexander recalled.
The Bloomberg reporters’ full list of potential new warehouse sites totals 76,500 additional ICE detention beds. As of January 25, ICE had a record 70,766 individuals in its detention system, up from 39,703 at the end of the Biden administration. So the “warehouse” plan could potentially double ICE’s capacity to nearly 150,000 people detained at any one time.
A new analysis from the Deportation Data Project, which has obtained large datasets on ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) arrests, detentions, and deportations, found that the Trump administration quadrupled ICE arrests during its first nine months, compared with the final nine months of the Biden administration.
ICE street arrests (i.e., arrests not at jails) went up by over a factor of eleven. Street arrests at this order of magnitude are a new phenomenon. For both types of arrests, ICE was much less likely to target people with criminal convictions. These changes led to over a sevenfold increase in arrests of people without criminal convictions.
As of January 25, 74 percent of ICE’s detained population had never been convicted of any crime (26% were charged with crimes, but not convicted).
Planned warehouse facilities are facing opposition from local governments and rights advocates, even in some Republican-leaning areas.
New Mexico’s state legislature, meanwhile, approved the Immigration Safety Act, which prohibits state or local government agencies from signing agreements for ICE detention and cancels existing agreements. Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham signed it into law on February 5, and it goes into effect on May 20. There are currently three contractor-managed centers in New Mexico—Torrance, Cibola, and Otero; all have faced frequent allegations of poor conditions and abuse of detainees.
Sargent pointed out that a recent Pew Research Center poll found that 64 percent of American respondents oppose keeping immigrants in detention while their cases are being decided, compared to 35 percent in favor.
“Imagine the conditions that might prevail for hundreds of thousands of people crammed into hastily constructed camps, the targets of a vicious campaign of demonization meant to build support for their detention and deportation,” wrote New York Times columnist Jamelle Bouie of the expanding ICE detention system. Recent reports about detention conditions, some cited in Bouie’s January 24 column, are unremittingly grim.
ICE “halted all movement” at the South Texas Family Residential Center, ICE’s detention site for parents and children in Dilley, Texas, after medical staff confirmed two cases of measles there.
This 2,400-bed facility was opened during the Obama administration, closed during the Biden administration, and reopened under the Trump administration. It currently holds about 1,000 parents and children. It is run by the private prison company CoreCivic. “ICE has the authority to release these families, who are not flight risks, on parole,” but it is choosing not to do so, even as many in custody did not violate any immigration laws, explained Elora Mukherjee of Columbia University in a New York Times column.
The Dilley facility “is a hellhole,” Mukherjee continued. “Children and parents consistently report not having access to sufficient potable water, palatable food (both children and parents have told me they found worms in their meals), adequate medical care, or meaningful educational opportunities. Lights are left on 24 hours a day, making it difficult to sleep. Officers have repeatedly threatened to separate families, including those I represent.”
“The guards are just as tough as the guards at the adult facilities,” immigration attorney Eric Lee, who witnessed a January 24 protest there, told Texas Public Radio. “This is not a place that you would want to have your child be for even 15 minutes.”
“There were a lot of sick people in there, and no doctors,” an eight-months-pregnant asylum seeker told USA Today after being one of 240 people quietly released from Dilley in January. “No one tried to do anything like separate sick people from healthy people,” said another person who was released.
ICE is holding many children with their parents in Dilley for more than 20 days, which goes against the 1997 Flores legal settlement governing humane treatment of children in migrant detention, which the Trump administration has gone to court to seek to overturn. One family told a Laredo shelter operator that “they had been locked up at the Dilley facility for eight months,” according to USA Today reporters Lauren Villagran and Rick Jervis.
The Dilley facility’s profile was raised after ICE sent 5-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos and his father there following the father’s January 20 arrest in Minnesota. Photos of the boy in custody wearing a Spider-Man backpack and a blue bunny hat went viral, along with accounts of how ICE agents used him as bait to draw his father out of their house. On Jan. 31, Judge Fried Biery of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas ordered ICE to release Liam and his father. His scathing ruling noted, “The case has its genesis in the ill-conceived and incompetently-implemented government pursuit of daily deportation quotas, apparently even if it requires traumatizing children.” Nonetheless, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is now seeking to place the father and child in expedited removal proceedings in order to quickly resolve their asylum claim and presumably deport them.
Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas), whose El Paso district includes the part of the Fort Bliss army base where an ICE contractor is running what right now is the largest detention facility, paid her fifth visit to “Camp East Montana”—a complex of tents holding over 3,100 people, including over 325 women—on January 28. “Things are not getting better, they are getting worse” at a facility where three people died in a 44-day span in December and January, Rep. Escobar said to the El Paso Times.
Rep. Escobar shared alarming details about the conditions suffered by women who were arrested in the ongoing ICE-CBP offensive in Minnesota, then brought to the camp, which is managed by a company, Acquisition Logistics, that got a $1.2 billion contract.
Most of the women have been wearing the same clothes—even Minnesota snow boots—for three weeks. Guards allow them to use a cellphone to talk to their lawyers—for two minutes, once per week. “They were tearfully describing how they were trying to get in touch with their lawyers, but they’d call their lawyers. They’d be put on hold, then the two minutes would be up, and the guard would grab the phone and hang it up. They would have to wait another week before trying again,” Rep. Escobar said.
It remains unclear whether local El Paso authorities will be able to prosecute the January 3 death of Gerardo Lunas Campos, a 55-year-old Cuban man, which the El Paso County Medical Examiner’s Office ruled a homicide, according to the Texas Tribune.
The family of Victor Manuel Diaz, a Nicaraguan man in his mid-thirties who died in the camp on January 14, is demanding an investigation. ICE has said Diaz may have died of suicide, but the agency had offered that same explanation in Lunas Campos’s case, only to be contradicted by the medical examiner and by witnesses who said the Cuban man was in a scuffle with guards.
The Nicaraguan man’s family’s lawyer said it is “suspicious” that this time, the autopsy will be performed by the U.S. Army, not the county medical examiner. Diaz, an asylum seeker with a pending case who ICE arrested at the Minneapolis Korean restaurant where he was working, had been at East Montana for eight days when he died.
Beyond Acquisition Logistics, ICE’s private contractors have been the subject of recent journalistic and NGO reports, as well as litigation.
To conduct an inspection visit at Fort Bliss, Rep. Escobar had to request access from DHS a week in advance, despite a 2024 law stating that members of Congress cannot be denied access to ICE facilities. This was because, as explained in WOLA’s January 23, 2026 Border Update, a judge briefly upheld a DHS policy requiring advance notice, citing a budgeting technicality.
On February 2 the same judge, Jia Cobb of the Washington DC District Court, sided with Congress against DHS, overturning the “advance notice” requirement.
The difference was the scope of the 2024 law, which, as a budget bill, was worded to prohibit DHS from using funds to deny legislators access to ICE facilities. In a January 8, 2026 memo, Secretary Noem argued that the Department could block lawmakers using a different “pot of money,” the $75 billion in funds approved for ICE last July in the so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.”
Judge Cobb ruled that DHS could not really separate the two budget streams (regular budget and “beautiful bill” budget) when blocking members of Congress from performing oversight in ICE facilities. Her ruling is a temporary restraining order; the issue will be revisited in two weeks. But at least for now, legislators should be able to pay unannounced visits.
The January 24 killing of Alex Pretti by a Border Patrol agent and CBP officer in Minneapolis, the second killing of a U.S. civilian in the city that month, generated a flood of analyses and commentary voicing concern about the organizational culture at DHS border and migration agencies. These concerns about aggressive, abusive, unprofessional, and unaccountable behavior, familiar to U.S.-Mexico border-area human rights defenders, are mounting now that a torrent of money from the 2025 “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” is driving rapid growth at ICE, CBP, and CBP’s Border Patrol component.
Concerns abound regarding federal agents’ failure to display the professionalism expected of any law enforcement agency.
Analyses have also focused on the lack of accountability for abuse, misuse of force, and unprofessional conduct, which creates incentives for further violations because agents perceive a low probability of consequences. Statements from top Trump administration officials blaming and denigrating victims, along with concerns about the Justice Department’s independence from the White House, have contributed to a climate of likely impunity.
In the wake of these incidents, current and retired DHS officials and agents have told reporters that morale is low.
Some analyses looked at the role of Border Patrol agents—who do receive crowd-control training—in many recent abuse allegations, and sought to place it in the context of the border agency’s often-troubled history.
Border-area human rights advocates note that Border Patrol concerns they have long voiced in their home region are now coming to light in the U.S. interior. “We’ve been having these conversations from the southern border for a long, long time,” Andrea Guerrero, of Alliance San Diego, which coordinates the 60-organization Southern Border Communities Coalition, told the New York Times. The Coalition’s director, Lilian Serrano, told the American Prospect, “We have been raising the alarm for many, many years about the situation at the border, about the violence and the way in which Border Patrol operates without accountability. And it was always justified that ‘Well, it only happens [at] the border,’ignoring that there are millions of people who call the border home.” Jones, the author and professor, added: “This is how the agency has operated since it was created, though for decades those activities have been hidden in the remote borderlands.”
This is happening at a time when Border Patrol and especially ICE are experiencing staggering growth. The giant legislation Congress passed in July 2025 provided more than $13 billion to hire at least 10,000 new ICE agents (its Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) Division had about 5,500 agents nationwide), and over $6 billion for more than 8,000 new positions at CBP, including 3,000 more Border Patrol agents (Border Patrol had 19,357 agents in 2022).
The Atlantic’s Miroff reported that after receiving more than 220,000 applications in 2025, ICE “signed up 12,000 new officers, agents, and legal staff in about four months. No federal law-enforcement agency has ever expanded this fast.” It may take five or six months for a full complement of 10,000 ICE deportation officers to be fully ready and deployed. When that happens, Miroff noted, instead of surging in one location at a time (Los Angeles, Chicago, Minneapolis), “the new hiring surge will give the administration enough personnel to target multiple cities at once.”
Some recent press coverage is sounding alarms about these new hires’ qualifications, training, and fealty to the Trump administration’s political agenda.
“With Donald Trump in the White House, and a servile Republican majority in Congress, ICE and Border Patrol are turning into the President’s personal army, targeting immigrants, Democrats, and, as the recent events in Minnesota have shown, just about anyone who crosses their path,” wrote Jonathan Blitzer at the New Yorker.
Faced with that possibility, many analysts are proposing reforms (as are Democratic Party legislators, discussed below).
WOLA’s January 23 Border Update indicated that the 2026 DHS appropriations bill (bill text – explanatory statement) was “nearing passage” in the U.S. Congress, having just cleared the House of Representatives and needing just a maximum of seven Democrats to support it in the Senate.
That changed drastically after the January 24 killing of Alex Pretti on the streets of Minneapolis. Democratic senators have since lined up in opposition. They hold 47 of 100 seats, and Senate rules (the filibuster) require 60 votes to end debate and proceed to vote on most bills. Their opposition forced the chamber’s Republican leadership to remove the DHS appropriation from a six-bill budget package that was signed into law.
Instead, Congress added to the bill a measure to keep DHS funded at 2024-25 levels through February 13. This allows some time for negotiations over Democrats’ demands for reforms to ICE and other DHS border- and migration-enforcement agencies.
If they do not pass a bill or grant another extension, DHS will “shut down” again, which would hobble component agencies such as FEMA, the Coast Guard, the Transportation Security Administration, the Secret Service, and others. However, ICE and CBP would be largely unaffected because the “big beautiful bill” that passed last July provided those agencies with over $150 billion in separate, few-string-attached funding through 2029.
The wave of national outrage following the January killings in Minneapolis may have made the Trump administration and some congressional Republicans more willing to negotiate reforms. “If you truth-serumed every elected [Republican] in D.C., like 90 percent of them are going to be pretty uncomfortable with some of what’s been going on,” an unnamed Republican operative involved in Senate election races told The Hill’s Al Weaver. “It’s not hard to see them taking this opportunity to kind of rein in the administration without directly confronting the administration.”
In an uncharacteristic move, President Trump even called Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) to propose negotiations. (Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) “made it clear that he didn’t want to be involved in negotiations at all; he thinks Democrats and the Trump administration should talk directly,” the American Prospectreported.)
On February 5, Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York) published a non-detailed list of 10 proposed reforms as conditions for supporting the DHS bill. This expanded on a significantly less extensive list that Schumer had floated on January 28.
The Democratic leadership’s demands include ten items: targeted enforcement, “no masks,” require ID, protect sensitive locations, stop racial profiling, uphold use of force standards, ensure state and local coordination and oversight, build safeguards into the detention system, “body cameras for accountability, not tracking,” and “no paramilitary police.”
Other legislators have sought to go further:
The Washington Post and New York Times looked into proposals for more widespread use of body-worn cameras, a measure that has received specific funding for years but that DHS has only partially implemented. Post reporter Maria Sacchetti noted June 2025 House Homeland Security Committee data showing that ICE, with a workforce of 22,000, had 4,400 cameras, while CBP had “13,400 cameras for a workforce of at least 45,000 armed officers.” The 2026 budget bill had included $20 million for cameras, but “stops short of requiring officers to wear cameras, and some congressional aides and analysts said this week that the extra money is meaningless if the cameras are not mandatory,” Sacchetti wrote.
Secretary Noem pledged that all personnel in Minneapolis would begin wearing body cameras, and that the program would expand nationwide “as funding is available,” but did not specify a requirement that agents keep the cameras on during operations. In fact, Sacchetti recalled, the administration’s 2026 budget request to Congress had called for “massive cuts” to ICE’s body-worn camera program.
As of February 6, the probability of a DHS shutdown after February 13 is high. Sen. Katie Britt (R-Alabama), who chairs the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security, rejected the Democratic leadership’s 10-point reform proposal as “a ridiculous Christmas list of demands for the press.” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), another appropriator, said he opposed Democrats’ demands that ICE be limited to judicial warrants to enter homes, and instead called for a ban on funding to “sanctuary cities.” Sen. John Kennedy (R-Louisiana), another appropriator, told Migrant Insider, ”What I smell coming is a long, long shutdown for DHS.”
A three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, one of the more conservative components of the federal judiciary, heard oral arguments on February 3 in a case that is the most advanced challenge yet to a July 8, 2025 ICE memorequiring that all migrants who arrived in the United States by crossing the border illegally be detained, without bond, until their cases are adjudicated.
The memo, which makes millions of people vulnerable to detention, applies even to asylum seekers, many of whom have been detained at their hearings after living and working in the United States for months or years. Because the Supreme Court has barred the use of class-action lawsuits in immigration detention cases, the memo has led to a deluge of habeas corpus petitions—filings seeking the release of individual detainees—that is choking the federal court system. There have been more than 1,300 such filings in the federal court system’s Western District of Texas alone, El Paso Matters reported.
The panel of judges meeting in Houston “appeared split,” Bloomberg Law reported, “with Judge Dana Douglas [a Biden appointee] skeptical of the government’s view and Judge Edith Jones [Reagan] more inclined to support it. Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan [Trump] also sat on the panel.”
The Trump administration is arguing that the law (Section 235(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act) requires mandatory detentions. Arguing against the detention mandate, Michael Tan, deputy director of the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project, told the judges that this is a novel interpretation “that covers millions of people, and that somehow escaped everyone’s notice for the past 30 years.” Tan added that when the U.S. Congress passed the Laken Riley Act at the Trump administration’s urging last year, calling for mandatory detention of migrants accused of some crimes, it would have been doing something redundant if the law had truly required detentions already.
It is not clear when the appellate judges will issue a decision, but regardless of the outcome, an appeal to the Supreme Court is likely.
In California on January 28, three judges of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court’s ruling that DHS Secretary Noem acted unlawfully when she ended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for about 600,000 citizens of Venezuela residing in the United States. TPS is a renewable status that allows noncitizens to live and work in the United States for 18 months when conditions in their home countries make it unsafe for them to return.
This was the first time an appeals court had ruled on the substance of the Trump administration’s terminations of prior TPS grants. The judges, a Clinton appointee and two Biden appointees, found that Secretary Noem’s “actions fundamentally contradict Congress’s statutory design, and her assertion of a raw, unchecked power to vacate a country’s TPS is irreconcilable with the plain language of the statute.”
In a concurring opinion, Judge Salvador Mendoza Jr. added, “I find it necessary to
address the ample evidence of racial and national origin animus in the record,
which reinforces the district court’s conclusion that the Secretary’s actions were
preordained and her reasoning pretextual.”
The ruling, however, does not allow Venezuelans in the United States to recover their protected status: the Supreme Court, in May and October, allowed the Trump administration to end TPS for Venezuelans while appeals were pending. “Now, the federal government could ask the full Ninth Circuit [not just a three-judge panel] to rehear the case, or it could appeal to the Supreme Court,” the New York Times explained.
On February 2, hours before the Trump administration was to allow TPS to expire for about 350,000 Haitian nationals, Washington, DC District Judge Ana C. Reyes temporarily stayed the termination. Judge Reyes, a Biden appointee, arguedthat Secretary Noem acted unlawfully, violating TPS termination procedures and the Fifth Amendment guarantee of equal protection under the law.
Reyes’s opinion found it “substantially likely” that Noem was motivated by “hostility to nonwhite immigrants,” noting a December 2025 tweet in which she called citizens of 19 nonwhite countries “leeches,” “entitlement junkies,” and “foreign invaders” who “suck dry our hard-earned tax dollars.”
“There is an old adage among lawyers,” Reyes’s opinion concluded.
If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither, pound the table. Secretary Noem, the record to-date shows, does not have the facts on her side—or at least has ignored them. Does not have the law on her side—or at least has ignored it. Having neither and bringing the adage into the 21st century, she pounds X (f/k/a Twitter).
DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said that the Department plans to appeal the ruling. The decision provides at least a reprieve for Haitians in communities around the United States, who fear forced return to a nation convulsed by gang violence, political instability, and economic collapse.
Over the past year, the Trump administration has sought to terminate TPS for citizens of Afghanistan (8,105 people), Burma (3,670, postponed), Cameroon (4,920), Ethiopia (4,540), Haiti (330,735, stayed), Honduras (51,225, vacated), Nepal (7,160, vacated), Nicaragua (2,910, vacated) Somalia (705), South Sudan (210, stayed), Syria (3,860, stayed), and Venezuela (605,015, see above). It remains in place for citizens of El Salvador, Lebanon, Sudan, Ukraine, and Yemen.
The two federal immigration agents who fired on Minneapolis protester Alex Pretti are identified in government records as Border Patrol agent Jesus Ochoa and Customs and Border Protection officer Raymundo Gutierrez
With the Trump administration accusing local police of dereliction and some in the community feeling unprotected, outnumbered Minneapolis officers find themselves facing difficult choices
Using more than a dozen videos related to the shooting of Alex Pretti, The Times worked to establish what is called ground truth: what happened, how it happened and who might be responsible
Within minutes of the shooting, the Trump administration and right-wing influencers began disparaging the man shot by a federal immigration officer on Saturday in Minneapolis
The administration was in a race to control the narrative around the killing of Alex Pretti, even as videos emerged that contradicted the government’s account
Gregory Bovino, the Border Patrol field leader, made disparaging remarks in reference to the U.S. attorney in Minnesota, an Orthodox Jew, people with knowledge of the phone call said
ICE agents can stop anyone they suspect of being undocumented. Now, residents are weighing their rights and their pride against their own safety
In the city where George Floyd was killed, Trump hastens a new social breakdown
President Trump and top administration officials, in trying to shift blame over two recent shootings, have mounted an array of arguments for the influx of federal agents
Federal agents began Operation Metro Surge in the Twin Cities late last year. After the deaths of two U.S. citizens, many residents say they feel overwhelmed
ICE has increased flights of immigrants detained in Minnesota to El Paso, data collected by advocates suggest as deportation flights in 2025 increased
With the Trump administration accusing local police of dereliction and some in the community feeling unprotected, outnumbered Minneapolis officers find themselves facing difficult choices
Feds stockpile 35,000 munitions in Minneapolis – but suddenly withdraw
Six weeks into the immigration enforcement surge in the Twin Cities, observers say federal agents are employing violence more frequently and with little apparent restraint against citizens and noncitizens
It’s impossible to ignore the administration’s blend of violent repression and overwhelming cringe
What ICE’s opponents are doing in Minnesota is part of a long and successful historical tradition: dissidence
Americans took to the streets to defend their neighbors in the nineteenth century, too
We built a guide to patches worn by ICE and CBP to help the public determine which federal agents are in their communities
What it takes to defend democracy from autocracy is suddenly crystal clear
We need to protect our right to carry cameras to document ICE’s violence
In the frozen streets of Minneapolis, something profound is happening
This DOJ is no longer capable of doing its job
The Biden appointee finds the state’s legal case too weak to grant an injunction
The chin-out rhetoric of Democratic governors about holding Trump administration officials responsible for violence in their cities may be more political than practicable
Efforts to curtail federal law enforcement tactics began last year, but with the deaths of Alex Pretti and Renee Good, Democratic lawmakers are pushing harder
The civil rights law that has allowed lawsuits against local and state police doesn’t apply to federal agents
State and local prosecutions could produce deterrent effects that are so desperately needed now
It is far rarer and more difficult for state authorities to try to investigate federal law enforcement officials than the other way around
State officials have resorted to unconventional methods as they press forward with their own inquiries into the killings of Alex Jeffrey Pretti and Renee Good
Democratic lawmakers have few options that wouldn’t trigger something like civil war
About 2,000 personnel will be left in Minnesota, where President Trump’s immigration crackdown has generated outrage
The White House border czar wants to focus more on getting immigrants already in jails. He’ll have to persuade Democrats to do it
Tom Homan, explained
After taking over federal immigration operations in Minnesota following the killing of two U.S. citizens, border policy advisor Tom Homan said street operations in the state would wind down if the agents are allowed into local jails
A year ago, Greg Bovino was the little-known head of a Border Patrol office in California. He rose quickly to become the face of Trump’s immigration policy
The White House is scapegoating Greg Bovino for killings in Minnesota. But Trump has spent years urging police brutality and mob violence
The most notable difference between Tom Homan and Greg Bovino is that Homan has deported a lot more people — and done it at a national scale
The news of Mr. Bovino’s impending departure came hours after President Trump sent his border czar, Tom Homan, to take control of ICE operations in the state
The departure of Gregory Bovino, whose tactics have drawn sharp criticism, is an indication that officials see Alex Pretti’s killing as a political threat to President Trump
The Border Patrol chief has been ousted from his role as “commander at large,” and will return to El Centro
Top Border Patrol official Gregory Bovino and some of his agents are expected to leave Minneapolis on Tuesday and return to their respective sectors, according to three sources familiar the discussions, sidelining a key player in the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown
The Trump administration has claimed the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua had taken over the building. But new documents make no mention of the gang and reveal federal agents had information about “illegal aliens unlawfully occupying apartments”
The former commander-at-large of Border Patrol, Gregory Bovino, clashed with other administration officials over immigration enforcement tactics months before fatal shootings in Minneapolis
The detainees’ lawsuit claims that their First Amendment rights are being violated
Mother whose visa application was pending says she will send girl back to US soon accompanied by another relative
More than 1,500 active-duty troops had been on standby to deploy to Minnesota, but were quietly taken off heightened alert over the weekend
A report from the Congressional Budget Office reveals the immense expenses of the Trump administration’s military occupations
The memo suggests the rules are designed to give ICE greater flexibility to quickly arrest unauthorized immigrants who are not the original targets of an operation
An internal memo changed the standard from whether people are unlikely to show up for hearings to whether they could leave the scene
The ruling in federal court in Minnesota lands as Immigration and Customs Enforcement faces scrutiny over an internal memo claiming judge-signed warrants aren’t needed to enter homes without consent
A conversation with the law professor Ryan Goodman, who has been cataloguing the Trump Administration’s defiance of court orders since the start of the President’s second term
Judges across the country are fed up with the Trump administration’s refusal to follow orders requiring it to give bond hearings to detained immigrants
What’s less commonly understood is that the administration also carries these types of misrepresentations into judicial proceedings
The judge had ordered acting ICE Director Todd Lyons to appear in court Friday and explain why ICE was violating a court order related to the detainee’s case
- Caitlin Dewey, “How Much Trouble Is Kristi Noem In?” (Vox, January 29, 2026).
Even some Republicans have begun calling for the Homeland Security secretary’s resignation
Officials overseeing Trump’s mass-deportation campaign are fighting one another for power
The president’s decision to replace the leadership of his immigration enforcement efforts marks a triumph, at least temporarily, for a faction of administration officials that had been sidelined by some of his advisers
Kristi Noem’s aggressiveness has sometimes given President Trump heartburn. She got a rebuke after a second killing by federal immigration agents but soon seemed to be back in his good graces
The president has turned his biggest political asset into a liability
This is a presidency that is, by any measure, failing
As Homeland Security chair, the Kentucky Republican has significant power to shape Congress’ response to the deaths of Alex Pretti and Renee Good
There is rising anxiety among Americans that the presence of an armed federal force in cities is actively making life less safe for people who live there
President Trump often blusters his way through a crisis, refusing to back down. Minneapolis tested the limits of that strategy
Outrage followed ‘would-be assassin’ lie but experts say architect of ICE drive too dominant a figure to be shunned
Voters still want a secure border but reject ICE’s inner-city tactics nowhere near the Mexican border
Top Border Patrol official Gregory Bovino and some of his agents are expected to leave Minneapolis on Tuesday and return to their respective sectors, according to three sources familiar the discussions, sidelining a key player in the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown
Soon would come a knock at the door by men with badges and, for Jon, the relentless feeling of being surveilled in a country where he never imagined he would be
Face coverings may work less to protect federal agents from danger than to make it easier for them to do unconstitutional things
Trump can’t legally force “sanctuary” cities to help ICE. So he flooded Minneapolis with federal agents. Here’s what comes next
The anti-government militia leader can’t make sense of his allies’ support for ICE violence
Alex Pretti, the 37-year-old I.C.U. nurse gunned down by federal agents, represents one set of values. Gregory Bovino, who until a few days ago commanded federal agents in Minneapolis, represents a different set
Effort to manipulate killing of Alex Pretti collapsed after footage torpedoed ‘domestic terrorist’ claim – could this be a turning point?
The broken relationship between Minnesota and the federal government
The Minnesota Democrat on the battle between his city and the federal government
The state is in a standoff with the federal government over who has the power to investigate the killing of protesters. It’s not a fair fight
In Minnesota, I saw scenes that reminded me of the chaos and violence in civil wars I’ve covered in other countries
Masks have become the central symbol of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement wilding sprees across America in 2025. They are emblems of a secret police
It’s worth exploring what those are and how the administration’s use of ICE compares with the ways paramilitaries have been deployed in other countries
Scenes from the violent unrest in Minneapolis played on a loop in many American households over the weekend, prompting reflection about where the nation is heading
Agents use facial recognition, social media monitoring and other tech tools not only to identify undocumented immigrants but also to track protesters, current and former officials said
Senators Mark Warner and Tim Kaine asked the inspector general of the DHS about a host of surveillance technologies, including Flock, mobile phone spyware, and location data.
These bureaucratic maneuvers are making it harder for immigrants to work, learn, and live in the United States
A Republican member of Congress argues that neither Biden nor Trump had the right solution on immigration
New census estimates show the effects of falling birthrates and President Trump’s anti-immigration policies. As his term continues, immigration is expected to drop even further