On 10 May 2023, at 09:33, andy.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Colin
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cyclox-forum/002901d9831a%241ec007b0%245c401710%24%40gmail.com.
On 10 May 2023, at 10:17, Danny Yee <bookre...@gmail.com> wrote:
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cyclox-forum/CACGhoBSekDfCQ4Mm5Vqqe8rORL_iSanvdUVdYCDfAbYPX-aGog%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cyclox-forum/B5B266AF-0911-4AAA-8627-B95DDACC0971%40gmail.com.
On 10 May 2023, at 13:12, Danny Yee <bookre...@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that's Roger Dudman Way, not John Garne Way. This appears to be owned by Oxford Uni, so maybe a letter from Cyclox to Ed Wigzell and David Prout, asking for these to be replaced by cycle-friendly humps? Alison?
Danny.
On Wed, 10 May 2023 at 13:03, Graham Smith <gpsmith.u...@gmail.com> wrote:
John Garne Way, designed to be anti cycling and the University extension is ‘not to be outdone’ in its anti-ness. Two new solid humps on a tight radius bend. It’s difficult to take a benign view of the reasoning here.Station west side
A gap - design of accident?
<image0.jpeg>A gap but undersigned, leaving unacceptable obstructions.
<image1.jpeg>And mire …
<image2.jpeg>Full hump force delivered here.
<image3.jpeg>Narrow gaps, also a punishment design.
<image4.jpeg>Then the University’s own evil continuation.
<image5.jpeg>Paranoid reminder, but acknowledging other path users.
<image6.jpeg>More anti-devices<image7.jpeg>Dreadful
<image8.jpeg>And newly pernicious. No escape, sharp bend with Trixmirror.
<image9.jpeg>Now, designed for maximum malicious intent.
<image10.jpeg>The trip hazard is proudly indicated.
Someone on Twitter identified this as a major problem. https://twitter.com/davidmpyle/status/1652630874528120832?s=20 too.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cyclox-forum/F0C637D6-4CF6-44C7-8A0B-D58B0A46E0DD%40gmail.com.