Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 4

[Jon Awbrey]

Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 4
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/04/05/survey-of-semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-4/

All,

C.S. Peirce defines “logic” as “formal semiotic”, using “formal” to
distinguish the role of logic as a normative science, over and above
the more descriptive study of signs in the wild and their antics at large.
Understanding logic as Peirce understood it therefore requires a companion
study of semiotics, semiosis, and sign relations.

This is a Survey of blog and wiki resources on the theory of signs,
also known as “semeiotic” or “semiotics”, and the actions referred to
as “semiosis” which transform signs among themselves in relation to their
objects, all as based on C.S. Peirce's concept of triadic sign relations.

Please follow the above link for the full set of resources.
Articles and blog series on the core ideas are linked below.

Elements —

• Semeiotic ( https://oeis.org/wiki/Semeiotic )

• Sign Relations ( https://oeis.org/wiki/Sign_relation )

Sources —

C.S. Peirce • On the Definition of Logic
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/06/01/c-s-peirce-on-the-definition-of-logic/

C.S. Peirce • Logic as Semiotic
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/06/04/c-s-peirce-logic-as-semiotic/

C.S. Peirce • Objective Logic
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/03/09/c-s-peirce-objective-logic/

Blog Series —

• Semeiotic ( https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2008/07/30/semeiotic/ )

Regards,

Jon