A vision of the future

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Bernard C E Scott

unread,
Aug 21, 2022, 7:44:26 AM8/21/22
to enolagaia via ASC conversations, RC51onSociocybernetics, Lucas Pawlik, jpsmith1945, Rodger Jenkinson, Marcuello Chaime, cyb...@googlegroups.com, Dave King, David Dilnot, Paul Pangaro, bgrtcb, Julie Barton, Jason Hull, Jon Ball, Jamie Brindle, Manning, Thomas, Marian Brindle, margaret Harrison, Bill Seaman
There's always a bigger picture ...

Nomad Century: How to Survive the Climate Upheaval Hardcover – 25 Aug. 2022

by Gaia Vince  (Author)
Synopsis/blurb
We are facing a species emergency. With every degree of temperature rise, a billion people will be displaced from the zone in which humans have lived for thousands of years. While we must do everything we can to mitigate the impact of climate change, the brutal truth is that huge swathes of the world are becoming uninhabitable. From Bangladesh to Sudan to the western United States, and in cities from Cardiff to New Orleans to Shanghai, the quadruple threat of drought, heat, wildfires and flooding will utterly reshape Earth's human geography in the coming decades.

In this rousing call to arms, Royal Society Science Book Prize-winning author Gaia Vince describes how we can plan for and manage this unavoidable climate migration while we restore the planet to a fully habitable state. The vital message of this book is that migration is not the problem - it's the solution. Drawing on a wealth of eye-opening data and original reporting, Vince shows how migration brings benefits not only to migrants themselves, but to host countries, many of which face demographic crises and labour shortages. As Vince describes, we will need to move northwards as a species, into the habitable fringes of Europe, Asia and Canada and the greening Arctic circle.

While the climate catastrophe is finally getting the attention it deserves, the inevitability of mass migration has been largely ignored. In 
Nomad Century, Vince provides, for the first time, an examination of the most pressing question facing humanity.






Bernard C E Scott

unread,
Aug 21, 2022, 11:04:40 AM8/21/22
to dave...@freenetname.co.uk, enolagaia via ASC conversations, RC51onSociocybernetics, Lucas Pawlik, jpsmith1945, Rodger Jenkinson, Marcuello Chaime, cyb...@googlegroups.com, David Dilnot, Paul Pangaro, bgrtcb, Julie Barton, Jason Hull, Jon Ball, Jamie Brindle, Manning, Thomas, Marian Brindle, margaret Harrison, Bill Seaman
Sorry, Dave, but in this scenario there is nowhere to hide for anyone. 





On Sun, 21 Aug 2022 at 15:03, Dave King <dave...@freenetname.co.uk> wrote:
Just another slice of New World Order Propoganda ! !

Bernard C E Scott

unread,
Aug 22, 2022, 10:06:31 AM8/22/22
to Dave King, enolagaia via ASC conversations, RC51onSociocybernetics, Lucas Pawlik, jpsmith1945, Rodger Jenkinson, Marcuello Chaime, cyb...@googlegroups.com, David Dilnot, Paul Pangaro, bgrtcb, Julie Barton, Jason Hull, Jon Ball, Jamie Brindle, Manning, Thomas, Marian Brindle, margaret Harrison, Bill Seaman
I,100, that's a nice round number. Do you know who they are and what their specialisms are?

There are 8.8 million scientists worldwide: https://sciencebusiness.net/news/number-scientists-worldwide-reaches-88m-global-research-spending-grows-faster-economy. The dissenters you mention make up 0.0125% of that total.

"A 2021 study concluded that over 99% of scientific papers agree on the human cause of climate change ..."https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change#:~:text=A%202019%20review%20of%20scientific,human%20cause%20of%20climate%20change.








On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 at 14:41, Dave King <dave...@freenetname.co.uk> wrote:

Blaspheming Against Gaia

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Report24. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

1,100 scientists declare in manifesto: There is no Climate Emergency!

A total of around 1,100 scientists from all over the world are opposing the climate madness, which not only threatens global prosperity, but is also being used by the World Economic Forum and its supporters for a dystopian agenda.

Is the global climate changing? Yes of course it is. And has been for billions of years since we have had an atmosphere on this planet. Does man have any influence on it? Most likely, although obviously not to the extent that the followers of the new Climate Religion would like it to be with their prophetess Greta, who is largely promoted by the elites. [And makes tons of money through it, wink, wink…]

At least approximately 1,100 scientists and experts from all over the world are of this opinion. So much more than one would expect if one follows the common media narrative, which claims that the so-called “climate emergency” caused by anthropogenic climate change is a global scientific consensus.

The Global Climate Intelligence Group (Clintel Group) has released a statement entitled “There is no climate emergency”. This declaration was signed by more than 1,100 scientists and experts from around the world, led by Norwegian-American Nobel laureate and physicist Professor Ivar Giaever. It says:

  • Warming caused by natural as well as anthropogenic factors — The geological record shows that the Earth’s climate has varied throughout the planet’s existence, with natural cold and warm periods. The Little Ice Age didn’t end until 1850, so it’s not surprising that we’re now experiencing a period of warming.
  • Warming is much slower than predicted — The world has warmed significantly less than projected by the IPCC based on modeled anthropogenic impacts. The gap between the real world and the modeled world shows us that we are far from understanding climate change. [Just because they managed to convince the gullible that they can see into the future.]
  • Climate policy relies on imperfect models — climate models have many flaws and are not remotely plausible as global policy tools. They inflate the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO2. They also ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial. [It should be obvious to even the dumbest, that since these are computer models you can get the outcome you want every time with the numbers you give in. Just like in 2 x 2 = 4.]
  • CO2 is plant food, the basis for all life on Earth — CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential for all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is good for nature because it makes the Earth greener: Additional CO2 in the air has promoted the growth of global plant biomass. It’s also good for agriculture, increasing crop yields around the world.
  • Global warming has not led to more natural disasters — There is no statistical evidence that global warming is increasing or making hurricanes, floods, droughts and similar natural disasters more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that mitigation measures are as harmful as they are costly. [But only for the slaves.]
  • Climate policy must take into account the scientific and economic realities — There is no climate emergency. Therefore there is no reason for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero carbon policies proposed for 2050. As better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we will have plenty of time to reflect and re-adapt. The goal of global politics should be “prosperity for all” by providing reliable and affordable energy at all times. In a prosperous society, both men and women are well educated, the birth rate is low, and people care about their environment. [You just said it, “prosperous society”, not something the Church of Climate-Theology wants. They managed to get those in certain high-IQ demographics to an almost extinction level through “education” and the jab, while in the low-IQ demographic they made them flourish. Dumb slaves are certainly easier to manipulate.]

So while these more than 1,100 scientists and experts are thinking objectively about climate change and the human contribution to it, Der Spiegel for example seems to focus more on defaming Professor Giaever, who accuses him of spreading “crude theories”. Why this? Because he doesn’t just blindly follow the alleged “mainstream wave”, but has his own thoughts on this topic.

Afterword from the translator:

There was a animated video several years back, long before the plandemic, by a young German YouTuber — I forget her name and the title of the video — about just that. In the video you saw a bunch of old, fat, money-grubbing shysters wondering how they can take more control over the people and steal even more of their money by selling them fear. They asked one of their younger minions, and that guy thought about it and said that it would be a brilliant scheme to sell people on the idea and fear that the “air” is running out, and if they don’t want to die of suffocation they need to buy their “canned air”. And lo and behold, people fell for it and worked themselves to death to buy a few cans of “air” each day to keep themselves and their families alive. Needless to say, the video ended with the planet consumed by empty “air cans”.

“Tyrants preserve themselves by sowing fear and mistrust among the citizens by means of spies, by distracting them with foreign wars, by eliminating men of spirit who might lead a revolution, by humbling the people, and making them incapable of decisive action.” — Aristotle



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: A vision of the future
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:03:44 +0100
From: Dave King <dave...@freenetname.co.uk>
Reply-To: dave...@freenetname.co.uk
To: Bernard C E Scott <bern...@gmail.com>, enolagaia via ASC conversations <conver...@asc-cybernetics.org>, RC51onSociocybernetics <rc51.on.soci...@listas.unizar.es>, Lucas Pawlik <pawlik...@gmail.com>, jpsmith1945 <jpsmi...@gmail.com>, Rodger Jenkinson <regd...@btinternet.com>, Marcuello Chaime <cha...@unizar.es>, cyb...@googlegroups.com, David Dilnot <davidj...@gmail.com>, Paul Pangaro <paulp...@me.com>, bgrtcb <bgr...@hotmail.co.uk>, Julie Barton <julieann...@gmail.com>, Jason Hull <jason...@gmail.com>, Jon Ball <jon...@email.com>, Jamie Brindle <jamie....@gmail.com>, Manning, Thomas <thomas.m...@ucl.ac.uk>, Marian Brindle <marian...@hotmail.com>, margaret Harrison <matahar...@yahoo.co.uk>, Bill Seaman <bill....@duke.edu>
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages