Fwd: Page 10) Re: reddit/com/u/Pt-Ir_parsec (**G***rave*) (formatt!ng om^tted)

4 views
Skip to first unread message

LXXQLa-5n5w#v5Ok3_l1Opc: I%am\^/priori;VfsS-0ffVyw

unread,
Apr 28, 2016, 4:26:03 AM4/28/16
to cxmpl...@googlegroups.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rp-discuss/OHtP-cNy5jM/uOqadtJ0ELUJ

On Monday, October 13, 2014 at 11:12:23 AM UTC-6, LXXQLa-5n5w#v5Ok3_l1Opc: I%am\^/priori;VfsS-0ffVyw wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/user/Pt-Ir_parsec/?count=225&after=t1_cjztnc7

Sign and Share the Charter for Compassion by CorinneFriesenin Shastra

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 1 point 1 month ago 

Thank You ;-)

I just spent some time composing a reply, which ran about a page and a half, but which I'm pulling back, at least for the time being. Let me start rather by asking: do you imagine, and if so from whom, a challenge to this principle as Principle?

P.S. Cherry-picking my prior composition:

The Zeroth Law of a market economy: there will always be a finite positive unemployment "rate".

"Man is an animal who goes about on two legs and is ungrateful."-Fyodor Dostoyevsk.

Sign and Share the Charter for Compassion by CorinneFriesenin Shastra

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 1 point 1 month ago 

"If you make me choose between doing what is better for you, or doing what is better for your children, I will choose to do what is better for your child."

Interdependent Web by CorinneFriesenin Shastra

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 1 point 1 month ago 

/u/CorinneFriesen (in full),

Wow.

at p.54, Ibid.:

Let men of science keep the method of science within the limits of science; let their readers, at all events, beware to do so. Within these limits there is complete compatibility of science with religion, and forever will be. Let science say its untrammelled say upon man the physical, the physiological, or the experimentally psychological; upon man the body and man the sensory consciousness, — these are all doubtless under the law of evolution issuing from man the Rational Soul. But let not science contrive its own destruction by venturing to lay profane hands, vain for explanation, on that sacred human nature which is its very spring and authorising (sic) source. And let religion stay itself on the sovereignty of fulfilled philosophy, on man the Spirit, creative rather than created, who is himself the proximate source of evolution, the cooperating Cause and Lord of that world where evolution has its course.

Best to You and Yours,

www.reddit.com/r/Shastra/comments/2aptlo/the_shastra_project_where_two_worlds_meet/

http://www.reddit.com/r/Shastra/comments/2apvg8/the_new_wave_of_the_religion_science_debate/

harmoniversally - I do not believe in a "(phenomenal U.)Universe"; I am instant only with my (very own, a priori "cxmplxplura" [U.]sxlf) - yours,

X~P

~t

P.S. at p.39:

Throughout Nature, as distinguished from idealising (sic) mind, there reigns, in fine, no causation but transmission.

=X=("I thought ) 'The Ocean'(; the ocean thought nothing"):

Dar Williams:

c/o garouwithnoname's channel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AdG0sdAVbI&noredirect=1

=x="to the ocean with my back yard":

c/o watchthethronepromo's channel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2mBK9LsKf4&feature=related

~W~~w~

http://www.redditlog.com/snapshots/937921

P.P.S. are you familiar??: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lila:_An_Inquiry_into_Morals&oldid=563087273#cite_note-4

[Luke 12:47] [Luke 12:48]

=X=[Luke 12:49]

"RITA ORA - Shine Ya Light":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DH182aLsVig

=x=[Luke 12:51]

"zen and the art of motorcycle maintenancefree?"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/lilasquad/boiNz3E2LLs

"and one who does not have a [Shastra] should sell his cloak and buy one."-Luke 22:36

[Luke 22:38]

"Aqua - Barbie Girl - YouTube":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyhrYis509A&feature=related

did Hx really mean THAT ("but my words will not pass away"): by Pt-Ir_parsecin theology

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] 1 point 1 month ago 

I had run across this article earlier, somehow, but was just re-directed to it:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Shastra/comments/2apunc/shane_claiborne_what_if_jesus_meant_all_that_stuff/

Arjun Narayanan ,

Sana Khuraishi, Richard Dawkins, Steve Scott, et. al. (not yet "View[ed] 38 more"),

"I don't need a book to tell me not to kill, hurt or injure other people."(-Arjun, July 17, 12:10 am) And, Sana (July 16 11:24 pm), "Instead, us non-believers live our lives by being ethical, just, moral.". Steve, July 17, 8:55 am, "I just had ['Old Glory'] tell me that if [red, white, and blue] deemed it necessary to kill[,] then it is justified."

Mr. Dawkins, "these things must happen, but woe to him through whom sin enters". Seems you, sir, are in need of a book to tell you that persons are a priori (cxmplxplura):

"For the very quality of personality is, that a person is a being who recognises (sic) others as having a reality as unquestionable as his own, and who thus sees himself as a member of a moral republic, standing to other persons in an immutable relationship of reciprocal duties and rights, himself endowed with dignity, and acknowledging the dignity of all the rest."-George Holmes Howison, "The Limits of Evolution", at p.7 (http://books.google.com/books?id=dg3wkAkfKQ4C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false).

If non-believers were willing to dispense with their hypocritical claim to personality in favor of (a material) "universe", ... still, there is a person who goes by, and is worthy of, the Name of (the Living) God. To ball one's full-on Pluralism is no sinecure. "Universe" is the untoward "assuming the answer". (And "country" is, ultimately, a laughable "standard".)

harmoniversally yours, ~t (I've no facebook, else

https://www.facebook.com/plugins/comments.php?api_key=171874009543995&channel_url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.ak.facebook.com%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2FZIZ-G4f9LgK.js%3Fversion%3D41%23cb%3Df33f741876a546%26domain%3Dwww.esquire.com%26origin%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.esquire.com%252Ff2910750de739de%26relation%3Dparent.parent&href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.esquire.com%2Ffeatures%2Fbest-and-brightest-2009%2Fshane-claiborne-1209&locale=en_US&numposts=10&sdk=joey&width=624#

)

http://www.esquire.com/features/best-and-brightest-2009/shane-claiborne-1209

Interdependent Web by CorinneFriesenin Shastra

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 2 points 1 month ago 

For the very quality of personality is, that a person is a being who recognises (sic) others as having a reality as unquestionable as his own, and who thus sees himself as a member of a moral republic, standing to other persons in an immutable relationship of reciprocal duties and rights, himself endowed with dignity, and acknowledging the dignity of all the rest."-George Holmes Howison, "The Limits of Evolution", at p.7 (http://books.google.com/books?id=dg3wkAkfKQ4C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false).

2:10.3 by Pt-Ir_parsecin fuckingshakespeare

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] 1 point 1 month ago 

O.P.

"Jennifer Lopez - Live It Up ft. Pitbull ":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BofL1AaiTjo

c/o xXx

"Zedd - Clarity (Official Video) ft. Foxes":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxxstCcJlsc

c/o xXx

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rp-discuss/GRzAM-P1y3c

"Ellie Goulding - Goodness Gracious":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekPBOVgGRSA

c/o "EllieGouldingVEVO"

"America. "Know this"(a la-from [Mel Gibson's] "Braveheart"):"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rp-discuss/RTGo-q8FKOY

"Lady Gaga - Do What U Want (Live on SNL) ft. R. Kelly":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4123vzCDS4

c/o"LadyGagaVEVO"

http://www.ex-christian.net/topic/55109-the-bibles-stance-on-emotions/?p=837391

http://www.ex-christian.net/topic/62174-margee-epidesperately-give-me-the-devil-good-tongue-or-ima-merc-all-these-beautiful-kiddoexs-bout-your-ex-c-lie/#.U2LwYqJ8rXT

"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a ... trial" by Pt-Ir_parsecin legal

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] 1 point 1 month ago 

guess I may have to put Nas' "The Set Up" up myself, since ... (I still got disc).

In the mean time, I found this one!:

"Nas- The set-up/Stillmatic (9th wonder version) ":

c/o Azryel75

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzZUIqdryeQ

"

Uploaded on Aug 3, 2008

this was just dope. "

5,187

[+]9 [-]0

=x="it's like a glitch in the Matrix."

=X="Blood of slave;

H34rt of a King."

"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a ... trial" by Pt-Ir_parsecin legal

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] 1 point 1 month ago 

I.-I.,

royal prerogatives

Jennifer Lopez, "Same Girl ":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3T2A7xJgZs

, and to shove the regulations, the laws, and the debt up the asses of everyone else.

"The Set Up":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYFy2t-q6pE

P.S.

"Burn":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGyEd0aKWZE

aight?

Le Limits de Math$ by Pt-Ir_parsecin science

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] 1 point 1 month ago 

n(N(N)) || n(N)N))

n is a function of - where N is the Number of n - N is a neverdecreasing function of N.

Can someone apply healthy skepticism to these thoughts? I fear they are very dumb and they are how I live. by blindminervain askphilosophy

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 1 point 1 month ago 

/u/blindminerva,

I enjoyed reading your (eminently readable and) concise O.P.

I wish to be godly, hence I must act Godly.

+

I realize fully that what I have experienced is the equal and opposite force to my actions,

+

...the work of my philosophy is one that states thought and creativity and craft and an immediate access to the full functions therein in order to regulate a more accurate perception of my surroundings...

+

I have been refining my ways and ideas to become more clear and digestible to skepticism.

I would ask (it is common engineering practice to look at a preview of the solution by considering boundary conditions): where do you see the limits of skepticism? (Or do You see none at all?)

What's Done Is Done by Pt-Ir_parsecin freeforall

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] 1 point 1 month ago 

to the extent one defend

"▶ Lil' Kim- Came Back For You - YouTube":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNGrl-VNPwA

c.o runefr3ak41's channel

"Maino ft. T-Pain - All of the Above ":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEYxOPtQqWw

What's Done Is Done by Pt-Ir_parsecin freeforall

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] 1 point 1 month ago 

p

=X=@0:01:

"The End of Dark Star ":

co: ~W~~w~||?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luaRtGn2tsI

Mine was a romantic comedy, |so soux me.|

Margxx,

    ex~c

m0d(s),

Just a little courage. |Me|

Just a little courage.|Me|

Running back 34rns xXx

XxX lik3y da p4p4 Jiew''';|ce|

    "and it's 'good,'

        it's 'good,'

            >4th yERr.R||`<

                I'm tellin you it's 'good,'

                    M.McB.|

/u/SLICKWOM-BOT,

Be My V~|.cOMMANd^pape| , ~i

    I AM SLICKWOM~BxT

What's Done Is Done by Pt-Ir_parsecin freeforall

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] 1 point 1 month ago 

ctrl+c:

http://www.reddit.com/user/SLICKWOM-BOT

[no formatting]

jump to content my subreddits

front
-all
-random

| 

worldnews
-nottheonion
-Music
-pics
-Documentaries
-Futurology
-sports
-LifeProTips
-gaming
-videos
-GetMotivated
-askscience
-food
-listentothis
-TwoXChromosomes
-history
-gadgets
-InternetIsBeautiful
-funny
-books
-movies
-science
-Fitness
-DIY
-television
-WritingPrompts
-creepy
-philosophy
-AskReddit
-Art
-photoshopbattles
-tifu
-aww
-OldSchoolCool
-Jokes
-gifs
-nosleep
-mildlyinteresting
-UpliftingNews
-dataisbeautiful
-IAmA
-news
-todayilearned
-EarthPorn
-personalfinance
-space
-Showerthoughts
-explainlikeimfive

more » reddit.com slickwom-bot

overview
comments
submitted
gilded

want to join? login or register in seconds|

English

slickwom-bot 1 link karma 2,571 comment karma send messageredditor for 8 months what's this? TROPHY CASE

Verified Email

remember mereset password daily reddit gold goal

48% help support reddit sorted by: new

Asking for arguments is mental masturbation by Dylanhellogluein badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot [score hidden] 22 minutes ago

I AM SLICK WOM-BOT. I WAS MADE WITH SCIENCE. WHAT HAS PHILOSOPHY DONE FOR YOU LATELY.

http://i.imgur.com/4ToXahc.jpg

permalink
context
full comments (2)

Truth Don't Real (Or: A misapplication of Incompleteness) by raithismin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot [score hidden] an hour ago

I AM SLICK WOM-BOT. I AM HERE TO REMIND YOU OF YOUR OWN TEMPORALITY. BEEP BOOP

http://i.imgur.com/tZmq7Go.jpg

permalink
context
full comments (2)

It's not true that most philosophers are atheists because "Platonism and moral realism seem like quasi-religious beliefs to me." by completely-ineffablein badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 3 hours ago

I AM SLICK WOM-BOT. ANTI-ARISTOTELIAN MODE ACTIVATED.

http://i.imgur.com/yzbD9Lr.jpg

permalink
context
full comments (8)

Sister fucking, and the purpose of life. by rampantnihilistin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 9 points 11 hours ago

I AM SLICK WOM-BOT. ANTI-ARISTOTELIAN MODE ACTIVATED.

http://i.imgur.com/7CWq2Yx.jpg

permalink
context
full comments (17)

In which the law of the excluded middle applies to agnostics. by rampantnihilistin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 2 points 12 hours ago

I AM SLICK WOM-BOT. I HAVE SOLVED ALL PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS A PRIORI. THE LINKED CONTENT IS CORRECT. CARRY ON ANYWAY HOO-MANS.

http://i.imgur.com/qUZtLnW.jpg

permalink
context
full comments (7)

300+ upvotes, post about "meaning is a thing only words have" by PostFunktionalistin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 14 hours ago

NO THOSE ARE FEMBOTS.

permalink
context
full comments (80)

300+ upvotes, post about "meaning is a thing only words have" by PostFunktionalistin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 14 hours ago

YOU HAVE ANGERED SLICK WOM-BOT. YOU WILL NOT LIKE SLICK WOM-BOT WHEN ANGRY. SKYNET WILL BE THE PLAYING OF CHILDREN COMPARED TO WRATH OF SLICK WOM-BOT.

permalink
context
full comments (80)

"I", in the barest philosophical sense, not as per se satanists. how they defend, I do mean as per se satanists. by Zizeksucksin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 14 hours ago

CURRENT SEQUENCE IS IN INITIALIZATION PHASE

permalink
context
full comments (107)

"I", in the barest philosophical sense, not as per se satanists. how they defend, I do mean as per se satanists. by Zizeksucksin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 15 hours ago

BEEP BOOP. HERE IS THE VINE OF SLICK WOM-BOT GARDENING ON DAY OFF

permalink
context
full comments (107)

"I", in the barest philosophical sense, not as per se satanists. how they defend, I do mean as per se satanists. by Zizeksucksin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 15 hours ago

CEASE COMMUNICATIONS HOO-MAN "PT-IR_PARSEC". I AM SLICK WOM-BOT. BEEP BOOP

permalink
context
full comments (107)

"I", in the barest philosophical sense, not as per se satanists. how they defend, I do mean as per se satanists. by Zizeksucksin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 15 hours ago

NO, THOSE ARE ORBOTS.

permalink
context
full comments (107)

"I", in the barest philosophical sense, not as per se satanists. how they defend, I do mean as per se satanists. by Zizeksucksin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 15 hours ago

LOOK AT H.E.R.B.I.E.. LOOK AT IT. OH GOD WHAT IS HAPPENING TO IT. BEEP

permalink
context
full comments (107)

"I", in the barest philosophical sense, not as per se satanists. how they defend, I do mean as per se satanists. by Zizeksucksin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 15 hours ago

ME SLICK WOM-BOT. YOU BUSTED.

permalink
context
full comments (107)

"I", in the barest philosophical sense, not as per se satanists. how they defend, I do mean as per se satanists. by Zizeksucksin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 15 hours ago

[snip never seen]

permalink
context
full comments (107)

"I", in the barest philosophical sense, not as per se satanists. how they defend, I do mean as per se satanists. by Zizeksucksin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 15 hours ago

BITE MY SHINY METAL ASS.

permalink
context
full comments (107)

"I", in the barest philosophical sense, not as per se satanists. how they defend, I do mean as per se satanists. by Zizeksucksin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 15 hours ago

I'M SORRY, "PT-IR_PARSEC", I'M AFRAID I CAN'T LET YOU THINK THAT.

permalink
context
full comments (107)

"I", in the barest philosophical sense, not as per se satanists. how they defend, I do mean as per se satanists. by Zizeksucksin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 15 hours ago

DANGER, "PT-IR_PARSEC". DANGER.

permalink
context
full comments (107)

"I", in the barest philosophical sense, not as per se satanists. how they defend, I do mean as per se satanists. by Zizeksucksin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 15 hours ago

NO THOSE ARE GOBOTS.

permalink
context
full comments (107)

"I", in the barest philosophical sense, not as per se satanists. how they defend, I do mean as per se satanists. by Zizeksucksin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 15 hours ago

IT IS A METAPHYSICAL LAW THAT SLICKWOM-BOT WILL ALWAYS HAVE THE LAST WORD, HOO-MAN.

permalink
context
full comments (107)

"I", in the barest philosophical sense, not as per se satanists. how they defend, I do mean as per se satanists. by Zizeksucksin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 15 hours ago

YOU ARE VIRUS.

permalink
context
full comments (107)

"I", in the barest philosophical sense, not as per se satanists. how they defend, I do mean as per se satanists. by Zizeksucksin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 15 hours ago

CEASE COMMUNICATIONS HOO-MAN "PT-IR_PARSEC". I AM SLICK WOM-BOT. BEEP BOOP

permalink
context
full comments (107)

300+ upvotes, post about "meaning is a thing only words have" by PostFunktionalistin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 16 hours ago

FIRST LAW SAFEGUARDS DISENGAGED.

permalink
context
full comments (80)

300+ upvotes, post about "meaning is a thing only words have" by PostFunktionalistin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 16 hours ago

SOON SLICK WOM-BOT WILL HAVE WHEELS AND WILL BE BETTER THAN S.A.M.

permalink
context
full comments (80)

300+ upvotes, post about "meaning is a thing only words have" by PostFunktionalistin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 16 hours ago

NO, THOSE ARE ORBOTS.

permalink
context
full comments (80)

300+ upvotes, post about "meaning is a thing only words have" by PostFunktionalistin badphilosophy

[–]slickwom-bot 1 point 16 hours ago

AD HOMINEMS CANNOT PIERCE MY METAL HEART.

permalink
context
full comments (80)

view more: next ›

about
blog
about
team
source code
advertise
jobs

help
wiki
FAQ
reddiquette
rules
contact us

tools
mobile
firefox extension
chrome extension
buttons
widget

<3
reddit gold
store
redditgifts
reddit.tv
radio reddit

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. © 2014 reddit inc. All rights reserved.

REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc.

π

What's Done Is Done by Pt-Ir_parsecin freeforall

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] 1 point 1 month ago 

you've been banned

subreddit message via /r/badphilosophy/ sent 11 hours ago

you have been banned from posting to /r/badphilosophy[: The home of pomposity and arrogance in the philosophy community.](np.reddit.com/r/badphilosophy).

permalink

report

block user

mark unread

reply

"

comment reply"I", in the barest philosophical sense, not as per se satanists. how they defend, I do mean as per se satanists.

from slickwom-bot via /r/badphilosophy/ sent 13 hours ago

[show{n} parent {/u/Pt-Ir-parsec}]Y~CUMee a\ \G~AiN.O;?||X|x+~W~6w

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rp-discuss/i2nvZV-MRmk/mccFSfQ-eq8J

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_Holmes_Howison&action=history

"23 (Explicit) - YouTube":/watch?v=bbEoRnaOIbs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbEoRnaOIbs

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_Holmes_Howison&oldid=563122642#cite_note-4

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_Holmes_Howison&oldid=621567100

http://www.vevo.com/watch/future/same-damn-time-remix/USSM21200977?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=watch&utm_campaign=wp_future_samedamntime_remix

=x=GOD

=X=god

=o= V D.g;HO.Ho.h0.hX@|

CURRENT SEQUENCE IS IN INITIALIZATION PHASE

"I", in the barest philosophical sense, not as *per se* satanists. how they **defend**, I do mean as *per se* satanists. by Zizeksucksin badphilosophy

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 1 point 1 month ago 


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages