Fwd: Page 5) Re: reddit/com/u/Pt-Ir_parsec (**G***rave*) (formatt!ng om^tted)

1 view
Skip to first unread message

LXXQLa-5n5w#v5Ok3_l1Opc: I%am\^/priori;VfsS-0ffVyw

unread,
Apr 28, 2016, 4:31:29 AM4/28/16
to cxmpl...@googlegroups.com

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rp-discuss/OHtP-cNy5jM/5A3VGxVmCB8J
On Monday, October 13, 2014 at 11:06:54 AM UTC-6, LXXQLa-5n5w#v5Ok3_l1Opc: I%am\^/priori;VfsS-0ffVyw wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/user/Pt-Ir_parsec/?count=100&after=t1_cl0flz6

A good article on the dangers of "relationship with God" language. X-post /r/Christianity. by strangelycutlemonin ExistentialChristian

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 1 point 8 days ago 

"YouTube - Keep Breathing - Ingrid Michaelson":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fORAPkfVV_A

[Reddit]you are doing that too much. try again in 9 minutes.

"YouTube - Mad World - Gary Jules":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4N3N1MlvVc4

A good article on the dangers of "relationship with God" language. X-post /r/Christianity. by strangelycutlemonin ExistentialChristian

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 1 point 8 days ago 

/u/cameronc65 (in full)

Yes, /u/Pt-Ir_parsec Christ used Abba once, Paul twice.

I am not trying to say He is not the father, perhaps familiar was the wrong word. I should have said similar. To try and make God "buddy Jesus," our neighbor next door, ect. This is wrong headed. Similar.

if you are not "the image of God" what qualifies you to count?

A good article on the dangers of "relationship with God" language. X-post /r/Christianity. by strangelycutlemonin ExistentialChristian

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 0 points 9 days ago 

/u/cameronc65 (in part),

I don't necessarily think anyone is saying that a relationship with the father is out of the question. But trying to make it familiar is, most likely, wrong-headed.

Abba

A good article on the dangers of "relationship with God" language. X-post /r/Christianity. by strangelycutlemonin ExistentialChristian

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec -4 points 9 days ago 

/u/ConclusivePostscript (in part),

can't not.

I would suggest that the Trinitarian dynamic is a great place to start.

Mutually.

the Mutually Trinitarian i'dea ...

be da Juice.

=x="you know you can't do the remix without me"-Diddy, "Same Damn Time (Remix), Future, Con Luda.

Don't nobody taunt like J!

    http://www.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/2i34xc/dont_have_a_relationship_with_god_you_arent_alone/cl057i4

Under a sheer evolutionary account of man, the world of real persons, the world of individual responsibility with its harmony of spontaneous dutifulness, disappears. With it disappears the genuine personality of God.-GHH, Limits, p.7"['For Light's the] Darkness [most feared'-Jewel, "hands"]; and hell at a glance"-DMX, "Ready to Meet Him"

Don't have a "relationship" with God? You aren't alone. by brokenbetasin Christianity

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 1 point 9 days ago 

/u/rtneace,

, and now.

incredibly:

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, 'Whoever wishes to come after me must deny himself, take up his cross, and follow me.'"-Matthew 16:24

"He summoned the crowd with his disciples and said to them, 'Whoever wishes to come after me must deny himself, take up his cross, and follow me.'"-Mark 8:34

"Then he said to all, 'If anyone wishes to come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me.'"-Luke 9:23

only: do You deem it by "the old school" definition of incredible, i.e. not-credible; by "the new school" definition of incredible --- a la "The Three Amigos"' "infamous"; (or)?

A world of such individual minds is by the final implications of this proof the world of primary causes, and every member of it, secure above the vicissitudes of Time and Space and Force, is possessed of a supertemporal or eternal reality, and is therefore not liable to any lethal influence from any other source. Itself a primary cause, it can neither destroy another primary cause nor be destroyed by any. The objector who would open the eternal permanence of the soul to doubt, then, must assail the proofs of a priori knowledge; for so long as these remain free from suspicion, there can be no real question as to what they finally imply. The concomitance of our two streams of experience, the timed stream and the spaced stream, raised from a merely historical into a necessary concomitance by the argument that refers it to the active unity of each soul as its ground, becomes the steadfast sign and visible pledge of the imperishable self-resource of the individual spirit.

George Holmes Howison, "The Limits of Evolution, and other essays, illustrating the [Jesus' "I~am: the way; the truth; and the life"] metaphysical theory of personal idealism", essay 6 (of 7), "Human Immortality: Its Positive Argument", at p.297 (http://books.google.com/books?id=dg3wkAkfKQ4C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false). "read before the Berkeley Club of Oakland, California, in April 1899" (Einstein's "amazing year" was 1905).

Is there such thing as natural theology? by Proteusiqin TrueChristian

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 1 point 9 days ago 

In the Spirit of Reciprocity: I am instant unto mysxlf.

Say ye ?

Existence of [the Christian] God seems to provide a grounding for purpose by ocelocelotin ExistentialChristian

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec -2 points 13 days ago 

"Dar Williams - "As Cool As I Am" (official video) - YouTube":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6BbvERTYhU&feature=related

"Machine Gun Kelly - Started From The Bottom (Remix) (Feat. Wiz Khalifa & Drake) ":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAJG6gyQX84

:MoQ I'deal Pluralism Wisely O.P.:

Lately I've been troubled by the "nihilistic voice" in my head, which tells me that all pleasure and enjoyment is arbitrary; that the "honest" thing to do might be to give in to despair and admit that life has no purpose - that there's even nothing Good about enjoying things: our enjoyment is only really a product of evolution and of our upbringing. Saying "I create my own purpose" is not enough justification for getting out of bed. (This has some cause/effect with my current mental state - I have been somewhat depressed recently)

I'm encouraged by the possibility that God's existence might offer a grounding for purpose: if God made us with the ability to enjoy things, then this enjoying things seems justifiably a Good thing.

Maybe by this we can have the idea of a world where we decide our own purposes (à la existentialism) but where those purposes are still inherently worthwhile, and not simply worthwhile-to-us - we're "playing in God's playground" so to speak; it is Good because we are enjoying his gifts - and yet without that being restrictive: we still have real choices, but the achievements and goals and passions that we decide to value as we choose are also inherently valuable because there's a God there who underwrites their meaningfulness. Maybe we don't have to worry that our lives' meaning is going to collapse underneath us.

>"knowledge must precede every act"-S.K., sidebar here by Pt-Ir_parsecin ExistentialChristian

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] 1 point 13 days ago 

/u/cameronc65 via /r/ExistentialChristian (in full 1 hour ago as I cliqued),

/u/Pt-Ir_parsec

Can you explain to me why you use x in certain words? For instance: "spontaneously sxlf-ordinate"

Also, what is this? =x=

And what is your meaning here: "P.S. Please feel welcome to "stalk" me. the game is Necessarily Personal, afterall."

Why have you decided to write this way?

/u/cameronc65 via /r/ExistentialChristian (in full 1 hour ago as I cliqued),

reply, in-line,

/u/Pt-Ir_parsec

=x="Legion" ;-"Every"

Can you explain to me why you use x in certain words? For instance: "spontaneously sxlf-ordinate"

i'deal problems dxmand i'deal solutions!!

Also, what is this? =x=

=x="say my name; wear it out."Rihanna's Drake

And what is your meaning here: "P.S. Please feel welcome to "stalk" me. the game is Necessarily Personal, afterall."

good ol' boysism rant.

Why have you decided to write this way?

I Know- how w3 Konvycts $iNg

"when the mu~zic 's_en`ded`"

    "▶ Jadakiss - Can't Stop Me - YouTube":

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pik1dRC8dTA

    "Styles-P Can You Believe It Feat. Akon":

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YC17qN06PE0

    "Styles P - Can You Believe It ft. Akon":

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXqD1L_rzUc

    "JAY Z "Open Letter"":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyUxCQt9T0E

>"knowledge must precede every act"-S.K., sidebar here by Pt-Ir_parsecin ExistentialChristian

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] 1 point 14 days ago 

/u/mypetocean,

Thanks for calling me by name. Below I reply to you in-line (I also reproduce your reply unbroken at the end):

@Pt-lr_parsec,

again, ... golfer clapping.

I believe I understand what you are saying,

comes to mind the saying "you are a gentleman and a scholar".

but only insofar as I ignore your strange parentheticals, insertion of irrelevant characters, indecypherable spellings, and strange formatting.

I had hoped to find far more people capable of doing likewise; clap-clap-clap. To be sure, "strange": no complaint; "irrelevant": like the dimples on golf balls; "indecypherable": you give me too much credit; "strange": no complaint.

For example, how is this:

=x="I~am: the way

better than simply this?:

"I am the way

my bible quotes Jesus thus:

"I am the way, the truth, and the life."

I punctuate:

"I~am: the way; the truth; and the life."

But you asked "how?". Answer: Grace. Fulfilled metaphysics in a (complex) "nutshell".

Is that "t" irrelevant to "nutshell"? nushell.

Is the "u" irrelevant to "nushell"? nshell.

Is the "e" irrelevant to "nshell"? nshll.

"shall I go on?"

And, how are we supposed to interpret what this means?:

(a priori cxmplxplura) persons

Grace.

Also, we had to remove a comment you posted

If you removed it you removed it. Care to explain from whence came the compulsion?

which was literally a duplicate of the OP,

duplicate of the OP with a (one-line) header. Fell free to Adolf my OP if you will, now. Reddit, thanks for the server space.

and it is abundantly unclear how these references to music videos from America's Top 40 improves your readers' comprehension.

I extended my invitation(s). On the flip side, I defend your what is well called "Free Will". Though perhaps "Spontaneous Personality" should be clearly stated.

Am I supposed to take Lil Wayne's opinion on wisdom seriously?

I do.

God does.

"Bunch o' Young Niggas, man, and we all doin' this. And we all up now. Real shit."

Ultimately, I like the message of this post,

I receive so little encouragement of the like, I won't pass it by without acknowledging my gratitude, but, that being accomplished: like an undigested kernel of cooked corn swirling down the drain if you don't follow through.

despite its entirely unnecessary difficulty,

your qualifier qualifiers - here "entirely unnecessary" - would be Truly irrelevant, if it were not for the fact that they are, precisely, the most relevant, gent. Shall I call you God?

so it will stay up,

Sieg Heil!

but please do try to format and spell in a way in which your readers will best comprehend your ideas.

swim or don't-swim; but telling the water cycle to divest the ocean of salt???

Take Care,

I presume I've worn out my welcome,

~t

@Pt-lr_parsec, I believe I understand what you are saying, but only insofar as I ignore your strange parentheticals, insertion of irrelevant characters, indecypherable spellings, and strange formatting.

For example, how is this:

=x="I~am: the way

better than simply this?:

"I am the way

And, how are we supposed to interpret what this means?:

(a priori cxmplxplura) persons

Also, we had to remove a comment you posted which was literally a duplicate of the OP, and it is abundantly unclear how these references to music videos from America's Top 40 improves your readers' comprehension. Am I supposed to take Lil Wayne's opinion on wisdom seriously?

Ultimately, I like the message of this post, despite its entirely unnecessary difficulty, so it will stay up, but please do try to format and spell in a way in which your readers will best comprehend your ideas.

US Constitution: Dictatorship & Inconsistency by Sheshbazzarin law

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec -1 points 16 days ago 

/u/DaSilence (in full),

Jesus man, whatever meds you should be taking, start taking them again.

...I find 10 posts from 8 years ago under /u/Jesus!

Only Today did I learn that "ELI5" stands for "Explain It Like i'm 5" (to the Reddit community). /u/Sheshbazzar 's http://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/2hk4te/us_constitution_dictatorship_inconsistency/cktgs7a may be for tweenagers?*

/u/DaSilence, this is actually kinda comical: are you prepared to lay down yourP life for "it shall become a Law" (@ U.S. Const. I.7.2)? But if not, ... If, that is, before you would Proudly "bite that bullet", you would start (whimpering) "hey, hey, hey, come on guys; wait a minute here; let's talk about this Law formality. $han't we call it something else while it's, so to say, still 'in the womb'?".

Some people be rigorous. Some people make "a shipwreck" of their faith. We (Here) Are all "religious". "People are just people.", "They shouldn't make you nervous."**.

footnotes:

  • "Moment - Lil Wayne"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mk9w7fwFnTo&noredirect=1

** Regina Spektor, "Ghost of Corporate[Person]*** Future":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9Ig6LCVjQ8

*** "▶ Alicia Keys - We Are Here - YouTube":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrKmDgk8Edg

I'll be beyond burdened for ~the next 2.Science~0 days, so, "just drop the kids off"-Rick Ross, "Pandemonium""there's a new crack; and a new stove"-- with Mister's' Carter.

http://www.vevo.com/watch/future/same-damn-time-remix/USSM21200977?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=watch&utm_campaign=wp_future_samedamntime_remix

~W~

"▶ T.I. - Hallelujah - YouTube":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LX8vUVpMIiw

'"<>"'

What crazy conspiracy theory turned out to be true? by mushroomwigin AskReddit

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 1 point 17 days ago 

/u/Sheshbazzar (in full),

"'Come Up Here'":

Hell is now.

"Let the wicked still act wickedly

and the filthy still be filthy

the righteous must still do right

and the holy still be holy."

"The Catalyst (lyric video)" - Linkin Park:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bftTUAIVMUQ&feature=relmfu

"In a large household there are vessels not only of gold and silver but also of wood and clay, some for lofty and others for humble use. If anyone cleanses himself of these things, he will be a vessel for lofty use, dedicated, beneficial to the master of the house, ready for every good work. So turn from youthful desires and pursue righteousness, faith, love, and peace, along with those who call on the Lord with purity of heart. Avoid foolish and ignorant debates, for you know that they breed quarrels. A slave of the Lord should not quarrel, but should be gentle with everyone, able to teach, tolerant, correcting opponents with kindness. It may be that God will grant them repentance that leads to knowledge of the truth, and that they may return to their senses out of the devil's snare, where they are entrapped by him, for his will."

"I can feel it" - DMX:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITnpWiuhQGk

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages