Fwd: page 3) Re: reddit/com/u/Pt-Ir_parsec (**G***rave*) (formatt!ng om^tted)

4 views
Skip to first unread message

LXXQLa-5n5w#v5Ok3_l1Opc: I%am\^/priori;VfsS-0ffVyw

unread,
Apr 28, 2016, 4:32:58 AM4/28/16
to cxmpl...@googlegroups.com

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rp-discuss/OHtP-cNy5jM/as1OO0SRMH4J
On Monday, October 13, 2014 at 11:04:01 AM UTC-6, LXXQLa-5n5w#v5Ok3_l1Opc: I%am\^/priori;VfsS-0ffVyw wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/user/Pt-Ir_parsec/?count=50&after=t1_cl2fwpq

http://books.google.com/books?id=vAIQAAAAYAAJ&ots=w5XKmPBykt&dq=The%20limits%20of%20Evolution%20howison&pg=PA308#v=onepage&q&f=false "The objector who would open the eternal permanence of the soul to doubt, then, must assail the proofs of *a priori* knowledge;" by Pt-Ir_parsecin DebateAnAtheist

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] 0 points 6 days ago 

/u/superliminaldude (in full),

/u/Pt-Ir_parsec (in full),

/u/superliminaldude (in full),

[ ]I will absolutely not hit you like a man. Unless you're a man. But fuck gender binaries anyway right?

superphenomenally, there is but the one degenerate Type of infinite I'dea: I~am (a priori cxmplxplura); phenomenally, I will continue to defend the distinctive finitudes I will, as We will.

What triggers what here?

G.H.H., Limits, at p.7:

For the very quality of personality is, that a person is a being who recognises others as having a reality as unquestionable as his own, and who thus sees himself as a member of a moral republic, standing to other persons in an immutable relationship of reciprocal duties and rights, himself endowed with dignity, and acknowledging the dignity of all the rest.

http://books.google.com/books?id=vAIQAAAAYAAJ&ots=w5XKmPBykt&dq=The%20limits%20of%20Evolution%20howison&pg=PA308#v=onepage&q&f=false "The objector who would open the eternal permanence of the soul to doubt, then, must assail the proofs of *a priori* knowledge;" by Pt-Ir_parsecin DebateAnAtheist

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] 1 point 6 days ago 

/u/superliminaldude (in full),

I will absolutely not hit you like a man. Unless you're a man. But fuck gender binaries anyway right?

superphenomenally, there is but the one degenerate Type of infinite I'dea: I~am (a priori cxmplxplura); phenomenally, I will continue to defend the distinctive finitudes I will, as We will.

http://books.google.com/books?id=vAIQAAAAYAAJ&ots=w5XKmPBykt&dq=The%20limits%20of%20Evolution%20howison&pg=PA308#v=onepage&q&f=false "The objector who would open the eternal permanence of the soul to doubt, then, must assail the proofs of *a priori* knowledge;" by Pt-Ir_parsecin DebateAnAtheist

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] -1 points 6 days ago 

"brain"(s) are phenomenal, thus, inter-dependent, and non-proprietary.Mutual Reciprocity

"Ashlyne Huff - Heart of Gold"

=X="Thus shall all the churches come to know that I am the searcher of hearts and minds and that I will give each of you what your works deserve."-]Revelation 2:23[

"Lady Gaga - Do What U Want (Audio) ft. R. Kelly"

http://books.google.com/books?id=vAIQAAAAYAAJ&ots=w5XKmPBykt&dq=The%20limits%20of%20Evolution%20howison&pg=PA308#v=onepage&q&f=false "The objector who would open the eternal permanence of the soul to doubt, then, must assail the proofs of *a priori* knowledge;" by Pt-Ir_parsecin DebateAnAtheist

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] 0 points 6 days ago 

What on earth is going on here?

,/u/superliminaldude (in full).

"Official "On To The Next One" Video! Jay-Z | Swizz Beatz - YouTube":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WM1RChZk1EU&feature=relmfu

"▶ Meek Mill - I B On Dat Feat. Nicki Minaj, French Montana & Fabolous (Official music video) - YouTube":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLNWhBFn7pM

"▶ Meek Mill - Repo (Cassidy Diss) - YouTube":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiW33br-G_g

"▶ Meek Mill - Levels [Official Video] - YouTube":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rh13do7fig

"▶ Meek Mill - Lil Nigga Snupe LYRICS Dreamchasers 3 Self Made 3 - YouTube":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqQ2Fezwa9M

"Lil Snupe - Melo":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJZYdWIlHJI

"▶ The Pretty Reckless - Hit Me Like A Man (Lyrics) - YouTube":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogDnZFbkBxY

http://books.google.com/books?id=vAIQAAAAYAAJ&ots=w5XKmPBykt&dq=The%20limits%20of%20Evolution%20howison&pg=PA308#v=onepage&q&f=false "The objector who would open the eternal permanence of the soul to doubt, then, must assail the proofs of *a priori* knowledge;" by Pt-Ir_parsecin DebateAnAtheist

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] 0 points 6 days ago 

=x="What I have written, I have written."-[John 19:22]

Not sure if this means the proof is in the Bible, or if this means you've already shown me the proof in a previous post. I don't believe either of these is a valid proof.

cf. /u/MetalHeel,

"Right, so evolution describes things that happen in the physical world."

http://books.google.com/books?id=vAIQAAAAYAAJ&ots=w5XKmPBykt&dq=The%20limits%20of%20Evolution%20howison&pg=PA308#v=onepage&q&f=false "The objector who would open the eternal permanence of the soul to doubt, then, must assail the proofs of *a priori* knowledge;" by Pt-Ir_parsecin DebateAnAtheist

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] -1 points 6 days ago 

/u/MetalHeel (in full),

I kind of get the feeling I'm talking to a bot here, not to be insulting or anything, because I'm not entirely sure if these are responses to what I'm actually saying or just algorithms built around the diction. I'm not sure how the uncertainty principle applies. I never said I was an "expert", but I honestly don't think it takes a neuro-scientist to know these things talked about are tied to a brain.

Time is therefore inevitably brought home to the soul as its real source, and our convinced judgment confesses the consciousness of Time to be a consciousness a priori; that is, an act of the soul, of the individual mind, in the spontaneous unity of its existence.

'm not really sure what this means. Time has a consciousness? Time is created by the mind/soul? Time happens and we perceive it happening via our mind.

"I remain but eternally-unassailed."

Freedom: =x="No disciple is superior to the teacher; but when fully trained, every disciple will be like his teacher."-[Luke 6:40]

http://books.google.com/books?id=vAIQAAAAYAAJ&ots=w5XKmPBykt&dq=The%20limits%20of%20Evolution%20howison&pg=PA308#v=onepage&q&f=false "The objector who would open the eternal permanence of the soul to doubt, then, must assail the proofs of *a priori* knowledge;" by Pt-Ir_parsecin DebateAnAtheist

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] -1 points 6 days ago 

/u/coprolite_hobbyist (in full),

I'll admit, that was clever

You're still a fucking retard, regardless.

""Young Forever" JAY Z | Mr. Hudson [OFFICIAL VIDEO]":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1nbvplgElw

"Machine Gun Kelly - Started From The Bottom (Remix) (Feat. Wiz Khalifa & Drake) - YouTube":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAJG6gyQX84

"Avril Lavigne - Here's to Never Growing Up":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXd2WxoOP5g

"Jay-Z and Beyonce - Young forever Live HD/HQ - YouTube":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKjqaFslZNs

http://books.google.com/books?id=vAIQAAAAYAAJ&ots=w5XKmPBykt&dq=The%20limits%20of%20Evolution%20howison&pg=PA308#v=onepage&q&f=false "The objector who would open the eternal permanence of the soul to doubt, then, must assail the proofs of *a priori* knowledge;" by Pt-Ir_parsecin DebateAnAtheist

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] -2 points 6 days ago 

He [Immanuel Kant] suggested that experience may be not at all simple, but always complex, so that the very possibility of the experience which seems to the empiricist the absolute foundation of knowledge may depend on the presence in it of a factor that will have to be acknowledged as a priori.

May being the key word. Evidence? All roads point to knowledge being dependent upon brains currently.

"experience may be not at all simple"Expert "all of a sudden"???

at p.301:

Time is therefore inevitably brought home to the soul as its real source, and our convinced judgment confesses the consciousness of Time to be a consciousness a priori; that is, an act of the soul, of the individual mind, in the spontaneous unity of its existence.

http://books.google.com/books?id=vAIQAAAAYAAJ&ots=w5XKmPBykt&dq=The%20limits%20of%20Evolution%20howison&pg=PA308#v=onepage&q&f=false "The objector who would open the eternal permanence of the soul to doubt, then, must assail the proofs of *a priori* knowledge;" by Pt-Ir_parsecin DebateAnAtheist

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] -3 points 6 days ago 

Right, so evolution describes things that happen in the physical world.

=x="you say so."-[Luke 23:3]

But with respect to this business of the soul and a priori knowledge, where are the proofs/evidences?

=x="What I have written, I have written."-[John 19:22]

http://books.google.com/books?id=vAIQAAAAYAAJ&ots=w5XKmPBykt&dq=The%20limits%20of%20Evolution%20howison&pg=PA308#v=onepage&q&f=false "The objector who would open the eternal permanence of the soul to doubt, then, must assail the proofs of *a priori* knowledge;" by Pt-Ir_parsecin DebateAnAtheist

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] -2 points 6 days ago 

/u/MetalHeel (in full),

Well maybe not explicitly, but if you were to destroy the brain of an individual, all knowledge held by that individual that they shared with no one would be gone. I see no reason why all knowledge would be any different (see my other comment).

at p.41:

Issuing from the noumenal being of mind, evolution has its field only in the world of the mind's experiences, - "inner" and "outer," physical and psychic; or, to speak summarily, only in the world of phenomena. But there, it is indeed universal and strictly necessary.

at p.54:

Let science say its untrammelled say upon man the physical, the physiological, or the experimentally psychological; upon man the body and man the sensory consciousness, - these are all doubtless under the law of evolution issuing from man the Rational Soul."

Grace,

http://books.google.com/books?id=vAIQAAAAYAAJ&ots=w5XKmPBykt&dq=The%20limits%20of%20Evolution%20howison&pg=PA308#v=onepage&q&f=false "The objector who would open the eternal permanence of the soul to doubt, then, must assail the proofs of *a priori* knowledge;" by Pt-Ir_parsecin DebateAnAtheist

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec[S] -2 points 6 days ago 

/u/MetalHeel (in full),

So I unfortunately don't have time to read an entire book and respond to it, I don't know if you have an abstract or something, but I'll say that I know of no such knowledge that just exists independent of anything. I would say that if you were to wipe all the humans off of Earth, along with all records of humanity, there would no longer exist the knowledge of humanity. We developed it via our collective and recorded experiences.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Holmes_Howison

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_Holmes_Howison&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_Holmes_Howison&oldid=628120082

http://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/226fqg/is_anyone_aware_of_an_argument_catastrophic_to/

Experience cannot be the efficient cause of the capacity preposition experience.Logic 101.

Create (Time) a reading of the title essay, "The Limits of Evolution"?

at p.17:

He [Immanuel Kant] suggested that experience may be not at all simple, but always complex, so that the very possibility of the experience which seems to the empiricist the absolute foundation of knowledge may depend on the presence in it of a factor that will have to be acknowledged as a priori.


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages