missing "show trimmed content" button cxmplxplura@googlegroups.com Fwd: Page 22) Re: reddit/com/u/Pt-Ir_parsec (**G***rave*) (formatt!ng om^tted)

12 views
Skip to first unread message

LXXQLa-5n5w#v5Ok3_l1Opc: I%am\^/priori;VfsS-0ffVyw

unread,
Apr 28, 2016, 3:22:26 AM4/28/16
to cxmpl...@googlegroups.com
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/cxmplxplura/mobydikc/cxmplxplura/NB_G4akrdmU/p-vJ8a4yPV0J
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rp-discuss/OHtP-cNy5jM/Mi_pNY7aEV4J
On Monday, October 13, 2014 at 11:29:09 AM UTC-6, LXXQLa-5n5w#v5Ok3_l1Opc: I%am\^/priori;VfsS-0ffVyw wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/user/Pt-Ir_parsec/?count=525&after=t1_cij64lb

Question about Matthew 19. by insurgent29in theology

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 0 points 3 months ago* 

by "man" we mean the fallacious habit of thinking oneself somehow not intimately connected, but independent (cause a bunch of "rich" stuff intervenes). No disconnected, independent minded ("I am too sacred for you!"-Isaiah 65: 5) person can enter "from above" into (George Holmes Howison's) Pluralism. "with God", "because without me you can do nothing"-John 15: 5.

furthermore, of course, "Much will be required of the person entrusted with much, and still more will be demanded of the person entrusted with more."-Matthew 12: 48.

theological interpretation, sort of by fpopperin theology

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 1 point 3 months ago 

"For this I was born and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone who belongs to the truth listens to my voice."-John 18:37

How do we treat the "gods" of our life and relate them to the Lord God? by BanterOfGunfirein theology

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 1 point 3 months ago 

And it certainly helps to Know, - having conquered all immature wonder, - "the Truth": I~am "the alpha and the omega": there is no extra truth foreign to I~am. Idolatry vanishes like the morning fog of a warming day when one realizes that the idol was only immaturity treated as maturity; yet, no loss of glory transpires in the process; and rather, quite the contrary: then "I shall know fully as I am fully known."-1st Corinthians 13:12.

How do we treat the "gods" of our life and relate them to the Lord God? by BanterOfGunfirein theology

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 1 point 3 months ago 

"To give (Pinkprint) is better than to receive (PinkFriday)"; yet, if "scripture cannot be set aside", neither can a God (Tim) I~am fail to give (Tim) reception.

Is transsexuality an inherent sin in Christianity? by meb9000in theology

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 0 points 3 months ago 

/u/Chel_of_the_sea (in full), responding to /u/JustUnderWater,

All biblical examples of mental illness are based on demons.

Do you mean to imply that mental (so-called) illness might also be based on saints?

|

I Might already be persuaded. (little wonder "the highest, most fulfilled, and awakened mind" rather gives, "nothing to be attained"-http://www.diamond-sutra.com/diamond_sutra_text/page17.html)

|

|

Considered philo"Law"sophy has emphatically concluded that there is only one type/kind of creative i'dea+, ++. Call it "I~am", call it "Quality", call it "Incredible", call it what You will, even "mental illness" if that is how you see your (a priori plural) self, but it is "kicking against the goad" to seek escape I~am reciprocate I~am Pluralism.

We (a priori cxmplx) each individually (a priori plural) I'deal weirdo. Now quit being a (philosophically) materialistic queer; not e''r'body matured to keep is soo "super-straight" under your (a posteriori) false burden.

/u/Pt-Ir_parsec

P.S. If you make me choose between doing what is better for you, or doing what is better for your kids, I will choose to do what is better for your kids. (superweirxd think for them - who are conceived "from before the foundations of the kosmouxs -to have to bear not only the sins of y'all demoniacs, but also to bear them at progressively elevated historical compressioning rates.)

++ Robert Maynard Pirsig, "Zen and the Art of motorcyle maintenance: an inquiry into values": "The first step down from Phædrus’ statement that "Quality is the Buddha" is a statement that such an assertion, if true, provides a rational basis for a unification of three areas of human experience which are now disunified. These three areas are Religion, Art and Science. If it can be shown that Quality is the central term of all three, and that this Quality is not of many kinds but of one kind only, then it follows that the three disunified areas have a basis for introconversion."-for his Confirmation consider https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/lilasquad/4MbkvM1Hoyk

$pirit-to-$pirit-amidst-$pirit,

Grace;

Is transsexuality an inherent sin in Christianity? by meb9000in theology

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec -1 points 3 months ago 

/u/Chel_of_the_sea (in fully),

I think we found the TimeCube guy's account.

think again.

An idol, that's what this doll was. It was a genuine religious idol of an abandoned religion of one. It had all those formidable characteristics that idols always have. That's what spooked him. Once they've been ritualized and adored, these idols change in value. You can no more throw them away casually than you can throw an old church statue on the dump.

He wondered what they actually did with old abandoned church statues. Did they have a desanctification ceremony of some sort? He remembered he'd been going to have a funeral for this idol for Lila's benefit. Maybe he ought to give it one for his own benefit. Just to put it somewhere without turning it into trash.

Funny feelings. Anthropologists could do a lot with idols. Maybe they already had. He seemed to remember a book he'd always wanted to read called The Masks of God. You could discover a lot about a culture by what it said about its idols. The idols would be an objectification of the culture's innermost values, which were its reality.

...

Maybe to keep from going to something worse himself he should bury it with dignity, he thought, just for his own benefit.

...

"Then why do I feel so bad about it?" Phaedrus asked.

"You're just waiting for your medal," the idol answered. "You think maybe they're going to turn around and come back and hand you a citation for merit."

...

"He doesn't have to. His head's already lost," the idol said. "She's going to use all those morals of his against him."

...

...But he guessed that the real destroyer was not the sea but that great ravager of most military installations, lack of appropriations.

It was sort of wonderful to see this old fort, built to assert man's domination over the earth, slowly sinking into the Atlantic Ocean. It certainly looked like an auspicious place for the interment of this idol.

He found a gate that led below the concrete to a dark chamber where he could hear water down below gurgling loudly. He entered a door with vertical spiked iron posts and I-beams. It was dark inside like a grotto. The only illumination came from below.

He turned to the right by a pockmarked wall and descended five steps leading down to small drop-off. He descended the stairs, testing the concrete carefully with his foot, went left, went forward, and then right again, into a dark tunnel. There he saw that the light came through a smashed portion of the concrete under which the water of the Atlantic.

There was enough light to show a dark high-water mark of the tide against the wall. He set the idol against the wall in a sitting position facing the entrance to the sea and arranged the shirt around it carefully. Within a few hours the tide should come and lift it out of here.

His mind said to the idol, "Well, little friend, you've had quite a busy existence."

He stepped back, did a small bow with his hands clasped together in the manner he had once learned in India, and then, feeling that things were right at last, turned and left.

Dear$t Robert Maynard Pirsig, LILA: an inquiry into morals

Is transsexuality an inherent sin in Christianity? by meb9000in theology

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec -3 points 3 months ago 

/u/Chel_of_the_sea (en lepto),

We ally because we have common enemies (namely, you) and because there is substantial overlap, not because [we]'re the same thin[k].

<my "[]"ing+over>

However the costumes may make us "do 'the laundromat'" (=x="Dance."-Ke$ha, "Blow"), we a'l Migh' KnoW dis:

Sin is unquestionably NOT a "non-starter"; "The God who Loves You"(-City Harbor, "Come However You Are (Lyric)") will still rhxxl8te.  I see (and precisely) no(-)Reason why transgender (*a priori*) individuals should not be tAK3N F*.Of* their "w.o.r.d.".  (And we know the bible turned to reasonable mercy stoning and crucifiCtion before permanentinternalshunning.

Enjoy Working the Journeys.

P.S. I am aware of an argument against metaphysical queers. And I am that argument.

Do you think sports can teach us any life lessons? by scchristoforouin theology

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 1 point 3 months ago 

/u/scchristoforou,

I haven't "done my homework" on You yet. (I do habitually "get to it"; the price ofF "I contribute\e;".)

Sh*t.

I contribute;

Thought of y=this when I saw Obama on the news, talkin' about workin' the night shift when young money was young, quippin "... and watching some 'Sports Center' too, thinking it was good for their education, cause - 'you know' - they should be well-rounded."

From your bare question, then:

(do you espeakee any xpanish?)

"Objectively speaking:1P+-5G.D. Skutvik,"

"Mad Congrats to both 4P+-3G.D. Por2gaal, and migo 1P+-2G.D. Ghana"

"no surprise when this came on Copa Time."

"If now isn't the time for the world to lovingly say goodbye to an ol' underdog, if you can't be happy for the U.S. in our recent loss, dat shit clitbroken. I was a traiter if I couldn't find a way to do her rightly. Proper Goal order: Por2gaal, 4lxm4ni4, Ghana, Por2gaal.

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lilasquad/XLTy6WbF9Y4/ncloljhXS0IJ

How do we treat the "gods" of our life and relate them to the Lord God? by BanterOfGunfirein theology

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 1 point 3 months ago 

/u/boyo77 (in full),

I feel like you are referring to the concept of idols? Tim Keller has a good sermon on this.

Tim Keller - The Gospel and Idolatry - Acts 19:23…: http://youtu.be/OOHdk3FR5Hg

Vis-a-vis i[']dolitry,

Allah is Great.

^nothing ^but ^definite ^*a priori* ^Pluralism

f.ex. "Rich Homie Quan - Party ":

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lilasquad/XLTy6WbF9Y4/bnqa7QpYXQwJ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nr6euxOW9Q

"Pris Maverick - Mirror":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZXkY2VPkGk

"Demi Lovato - skyscraper":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_8ydghbGSg

Grace,

Grace, Grace, Grace.

Amen.

Amen, amen.

&UNconditionallyPlural

=x="Let your 'yes' be yes; and your 'no' be no."

How do we treat the "gods" of our life and relate them to the Lord God? by BanterOfGunfirein theology

[–]Pt-Ir_parsec 1 point 3 months ago 

/u/BanterOfGunfire (O.P. in full),

That may seem confusing and unspecific, but what I mean by "gods' are basically the "god of sex", the "god of money", etc. These gods I'm referring to are what are seen often as sinful desires and the desires that man has put against God. However, I want to think that these can be good things and even things that can be used to glorify God whilst still maintaining spiritually purity (abstaining from sex, humility, etc.). Can anyone answer this for me?

Love the question!

Tat Twam Asi

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tat_Tvam_Asi&action=history

Jesus Broke Bread||e,

"When you do this, Do this in memory of me;":

"This is +my+ ..."

Tat Twam Asi <=x="two times for the bad b*tches"-Meek Mill, "Levels": Tat Twam Asi>

There would be no-holy+communion if 'twere all "one+sided"

(I myself have been known to roc ~W~~W~, tongue out like I'm "Be like Mike" Jordan as I take RomanCatholic Body.)

['"<&>'"]

Jesus' H:ly invitation was nothing less than D~*vynne

|

|

|

=x="I come through mine"-D.M.X.:

"DMX - Look Thru My Eyes ":

:c/o "Black Watch Ent"

"Rihanna - Umbrella (Orange Version) ft. JAY-Z":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvBfHwUxHIk

"/u/BanterOfGunfire (O.P. in full),

That may seem confusing and unspecific, but what I mean by "gods' are basically the "god of sex", the "god of money", etc. These gods I'm referring to are what are seen often as sinful desires and the desires that man has put against God. However, I want to think that these can be good things and even things that can be used to glorify God whilst still maintaining spiritually purity (abstaining from sex, humility, etc.). Can anyone answer this for me?

Love the question!

Tat Twam Asi

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tat_Tvam_Asi&action=history

Jesus Broke Bread||e,

"When you do this, Do this in memory of me;":

"This is +my+ ..."

Tat Twam Asi <=x="two times for the bad b*tches"-Meek Mill, "Levels": Tat Twam Asi>

There would be no-holy+communion if 'twere all "one+sided"

(I myself have been known to roc ~W~~W~, tongue out like I'm "Be like Mike" Jordan as I take RomanCatholic Body.)

['"<&>'"]

Jesus' H:ly invitation was nothing less than D~*vynne

|

|

|

=x="I come through mine"-D.M.X.:

"DMX - Look Thru My Eyes ":

c/o "Black Watch Ent":

"Rihanna - Umbrella (Orange Version) ft. JAY-Z":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvBfHwUxHIk

"Christina Aguilera featuring Redman - Dirrty ":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Rg3sAb8Id8

"Maino ft. T-Pain - All of the Above ":

c/o "runefr3ak41's channel":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEYxOPtQqWw

...

CccnAvfLPvExXDeiovnCv1o*redd.it/2u8d22~~^~~2u7io?*

unread,
Apr 28, 2016, 5:01:31 AM4/28/16
to cxmplxplura
make this waste useful:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rp-discuss/0wk8UHCMo48

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/cxmplxplura/NB_G4akrdmU

 

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/cxmplxplura/2VFJ74IVQaM

 

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/cxmplxplura/pZoeVI9Znp0

 

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/cxmplxplura/VV1bd3x51Nc

 

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/cxmplxplura/Hpsy6OZxtOM

 

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/cxmplxplura/PSsQACEZwEY

 

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/cxmplxplura/wHnUfH7h9pI

 

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/cxmplxplura/pi4dnryS51o

 

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/cxmplxplura/UQERAOIWgPY

 

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/cxmplxplura/JLN722yf_vw

 

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/cxmplxplura/Lm6IWCZR2sg

 

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/cxmplxplura/SNkj-L1TMg0

 

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/cxmplxplura/Q_xixR-JZ1s

http://web.archive.org/web/20151212211027/https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAnAtheist/comments/2ijzpu/arguments_against_an_impersonal_nonagent_god/cl35jrq

http://web.archive.org/web/20160428084500/https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAnAtheist/comments/2ijzpu/arguments_against_an_impersonal_nonagent_god/

http://web.archive.org/web/20160428084623/https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAnAtheist/comments/2ijzpu/arguments_against_an_impersonal_nonagent_god/cl2snhh


http://web.archive.org/web/20160428062414/https://www.reddit.com/user/mobydikc

 

http://web.archive.org/web/20160428062531/https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/4gjh3s/is_theism_realistically_a_serious_philosophical/d2iguhv?context=3

 

http://web.archive.org/web/20160428062734/https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/4gjh3s/is_theism_realistically_a_serious_philosophical/d2iguhv

 

http://web.archive.org/web/20160428062902/https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/4gjh3s/is_theism_realistically_a_serious_philosophical/


https://www.reddit.com/user/nijyttk8

sorted by:
new

Us for Them by enochro in ChristiEnts

[–]nijyttk8 1 point  

/u/enochro,

thanks for the recommendation to Us for Them | Gungor!

The following is not without the firmest of foundations (my emphasis):

"Accordingly we may explicate the new doctrine of Jesus into these three truths: (1) That God is the perfect Person, the central member in the universal society actuated by love; (2) that the soul is immortal; (3) that it is free, both in the sense of being the responsible author of all its acts, and in the sense that its fund of ultimate resources is equal to fulfilling its duty to love as God loves."

-George Holmes Howison, "The Limits of Evolution", at page 256-7.

Thinking also of /u/TommyG3nTz and /u/charlie6969: np.reddit.com/r/ChristiEnts/comments/4a9mil/best_place_to_do_this_agnostic_with_troubles/d0ypxga

we can share in God's heart

we can share in God's heart

we can share in God's heart b[...]

To Christians: Approached by an evil spirit calling itself "lord dragon" masquerading as God. by rainmayyetcome in Christianity

[–]nijyttk8 2 points  

It seems more plausible that spirituality is a normal hu[...]

“The process which has led us to this result, and which might justifiably be called a Critique of all Scepticism, yields also the final impossibility of materialism in a still clearer way than we noticed before. We saw, some distance back, that the actual of sense could by no possibility be the source of consciousness, being, on the contrary, its mere phenomenon — its mere externalised presentation (picture-object) originated from within. But the hypothetical potential of sense, the assumed subsensible substance called matter, we have now seen to be precisely that self-contradiction talked of as the physical thing-in-itself, and it therefore disappears from the real universe along with that illusion. We have, then, a definitive Critique of all Materialism.” (italics in original)

If the world hates you by Stillaliveage89 in Christianity

[–]nijyttk8 1 point  

the motorcycle has feelings:

at about minute 44 (of about 54): "I beseech ye in the Name of Christ"

God Bless you too Jim.

[sandals::cgnl899](https://np.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/4bv6sd/why_does_the_father_in_luke_15_embrace_the_son/) by nijyttk8 in Christanity2

[–]nijyttk8[S] 0 points  

/u/JHBlanks

Are you a bot?

no

You reply and message me with nonsense relating to stuff that's SIX MONTHS OLD every other week or so.

"Thou shalt not bear false witness."-Bible

Seriously, what do we have here?

seriously

A broken reddit link,

I call it an "open" reddit link.

a link to a Rihanna song

a linked comment "&lc=" to a Beyonce music video.

and a suffix to another video i'm not going to bother looking up.

you say "suffix" I say "key"; either way: "in a 65".

Stop sending me nonsense!

I replied to my own comment; and if you would have corrected my erroneous indenting first time through, ...

But thanks for my little thread here, if you can't tell, I treasure it.

[Hebrews 12:10] "They disciplined us for a short time as seemed right to them, but he does so for our benefit, in order that we may share his holiness."

[sandals::cgnl899](https://np.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/4bv6sd/why_does_the_father_in_luke_15_embrace_the_son/) by nijyttk8 in Christanity2

[–]nijyttk8[S] 0 points  

correction (in part):

Why on earth would you choose to link this of all posts to a dead sub?

~~~

[–]to JHBlancs sent <Thu Mar 17 17:39:25 2016 UTC>

/u/JHBlancs

Re: may_I_pray_for_you_friend

We all carry burdens and struggles that we want

1) https://www.reddit.com/user/

breakthrough in,

2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xUfCUFPL-8&lc=z124czyzwkruutzvl22sxnj5jkakhnrub

or peace in,

3) tnAbKuGss4Y

or just someone to think about us going through them.

God Bless

· permalink

How do you know the difference between being possessed/oppressed by a demon, being "one" with a demon and actually being a demon? by The-Transcoder in Christianity

[–]nijyttk8 1 point  

Hey youngblood,

I stumbled onto you just recently. If you please:

[John 14:6] “Jesus said to him, ‘I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.’”

“…a redemption that arises out of the soul itself, the merit of virtue that is its own, and a peace that is indeed WITHIN.” <emphasis in [original]( https://books.google.com/books?id=dg3wkAkfKQ4C&pg=PA380#v=onepage&q&f=false)>

[John 10:29] “My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all, and no one can take them out of the Father’s hand.

“He <Kant> suggested that experience may be not at all simple, but always complex, so that the very possibility of the experience which seems to the empiricist the absolute foundation of knowledge may depend on the presence in it of a factor that will have to be acknowledged as a priori. This factor issues from the nature of the mind that has the experience, and introduces into experience all that distinguishableness, that arrangedness, and that describable form, without which it could not be conceived as apprehensible or intelligible, that is, as an experience at all.”-“The Limits of Evolution”, George Holmes Howison

[Luke 6:40] “No disciple is superior to the teacher; but when fully trained, every disciple will be like his teacher.”

“All the being of each self has thus the form of a self-supplying, self-operating life; or, in the phraseology of the Schoolmen and Spinoza, each is causa sui. This is what its "eternity" exactly means.”

[John 10:30] “The Father and I are one.”

“For the very quality of personality is, that a person is a being who recognises others as having a reality as unquestionable as his own, and who thus sees himself as a member of a moral republic, standing to other persons in an immutable relationship of reciprocal duties and rights, himself endowed with dignity, and acknowledging the dignity of all the rest.”

[John 17:22] “And I have given them the glory you gave me, so that they may be one, as we are one,”

“IV. The members of this Eternal Republic have no origin but their purely logical one of reference to each other, including thus their primary reference to God. That is, in the literal sense of the word, they have no origin at all — no source in time whatever. There is nothing at all, prior to them, out of which their being arises; they are not "things" in the chain of efficient causation. They simply are, and together constitute the eternal order.”-at p.xiv

Perhaps I shouldn’t mention this because, one, I shant speak to anthroposophy, and two, it’s been a good while since I read this, but I definitely benefited from reading it, and it may be “up your alley”:

Through the force of the Christ Who came upon the earth, the son of man will again be raised to his divine estate. Previously, after the manner of the ancient Mystery initiation, only chosen individuals could perceive the divine-spiritual world. In ancient times there was a technical expression for this. Those who could look into the divine-spiritual world and could become witnesses of it were called “serpents.” Those men of ancient times who were initiated into the Mysteries in this way were “serpents.” The “serpents” were the forerunners of the deed of Christ Jesus. Moses showed his mission by lifting up before his people the symbol of the elevation of those who could perceive in the spiritual worlds; he lifted up the serpent. What these chosen few had then become, now every “son of man” could attain through the force of the Christ present upon the earth. This the Christ expresses in his further conversation with Nicodemus when He says: — “Just as once upon a time Moses lifted up the serpent, even so will the son of man be lifted up.”

“don’t let the bar-studs get you down”, and you will come to be able to “keep your own counsel”,

the Grace of God be with You

[sandals::cgnl899](https://np.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/4bv6sd/why_does_the_father_in_luke_15_embrace_the_son/) by nijyttk8 in Christanity2

[–]nijyttk8[S] 1 point  

/u/JHBlancs (in full),

Dude, keep PMing me, and i'll report it to... someone.

I've sent precisely two PMs, the latter was to You, because - inter alia - I owed You. The first was to /u/Southernerd, because I missed my opportunity to reply publicly due to inactivity.

[sandals::cgnl899](https://np.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/4bv6sd/why_does_the_father_in_luke_15_embrace_the_son/) by nijyttk8 in Christanity2

[–]nijyttk8[S] 1 point  

/u/HoundOfGod,https://www.reddit.com/r/Christanity2/comments/4bvc9i/sandalscgnl899httpsnpredditcomrchristianitycomment/d1dlq9b

I am confused, and yet intrigued.

http://web.archive.org/web/20160326023131/https://www.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/4bv6sd/why_does_the_father_in_luke_15_embrace_the_son/d1cr08b

And why would this of all things be your first action ever on Reddit in a year old account?

http://web.archive.org/web/20160314034843/https://www.reddit.com/user/nijyttk8

http://web.archive.org/web/20160314060246/https://www.reddit.com/user/nijyttk8?count=25&after=t3_3yxs6t

http://web.archive.org/web/20160314060333/https://www.reddit.com/user/nijyttk8?count=50&after=t1_cvlavrm

Why on earth would you choose to link this of all posts to a dead sub?

[–]to JHBlancs sent <Thu Mar 17 17:39:25 2016 UTC>

/u/JHBlancs

Re: may_I_pray_for_you_friend

We all carry burdens and struggles that we want

1) https://www.reddit.com/user/

breakthrough in,

2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xUfCUFPL-8&lc=z124czyzwkruutzvl22sxnj5jkakhnrub

or peace in,

3) tnAbKuGss4Y

or just someone to think about us going through them.

God Bless

· permalink

https://www.reddit.com/message/messages/55wkp6

[–]from JHBlancs sent <Thu Mar 17 18:01:51 2016 UTC>

.... What?

· permalink

https://www.reddit.com/message/messages/55wpjn

&etc.

[Genesis 2:24] [Mark 10:9] “Let them eat [Pi]” [Revelation 19:5] RE “What about second-breakfast?” [Luke 10:26] “Don’t think [$]he knows about second-breakfast, Pip.” [Matthew 5:41] [Genesis 1:27] by nijyttk8 in Catholicism

[–]nijyttk8[S] 1 point  

http://web.archive.org/web/20160314011507/https://www.reddit.com/r/Catholicism/new/

http://web.archive.org/web/20160314011642/https://www.reddit.com/r/Catholicism/

http://web.archive.org/web/20160314011754/https://www.reddit.com/r/Catholicism/controversial/

"What About Second Breakfast? (The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring)": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkzvHtjnNOs&t=34s

[Genesis 2:24] [Mark 10:9] “Let them eat [Pi]” [Revelation 19:5] RE “What about second-breakfast?” [Luke 10:26] “Don’t think [$]he knows about second-breakfast, Pip.” [Matthew 5:41] [Genesis 1:27]

http://www.ewtn.com/library/MARY/CANDLEMS.htm

[Joel 2:12-13]Hap looming Palm 700

https://np.reddit.com/r/Catholic/comments/43yf5k/candlemasshttpwwwewtncomlibrarymarycandlemshtmhttp/^https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9C8EfRboWfU&lc=z13hc1giuqrlir1bj04cf3qhwpy0u1qizcw

view more: next ›

https://www.reddit.com/user/nijyttk8?count=25&after=t1_czp6bbq

sorted by:
new

[/r/MetaphysicsofQuality/comments/2eggk7/both/^ redd.it/435dv6]( http://web.archive.org/web/20160130181223/http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_29390014/andrews:-colorado-lets-be-the-backbone-state) by nijyttk8 in MOQ

[–]nijyttk8[S] 1 point  

David ,

“In short, my object in that passage, quite preparatory, is to state in the sharpest way the question of the possible harmonisation of freedom and determinism, and to show that this is clearly possible if (but only if) the two are read off, respectively, as the obverse and the reverse of the conception Self-determination, reduced to identity with Self-definition; by this path I pass to the conception of a pluralistic and libertarian rationalism, as transcending the monistic and necessarian rationalism of Hegel's school, and.of a pluralism rationally organised by the self-definition of each mind in it, as transcending the irrational pluralism — confessed to repose at bottom on chance and unintelligibility — which is all that is attainable on the "radical empiricism " of Professor James and his associates.”

Adrie ,

“Of course, the theory of Personal Idealism, in common with every other that detects the fallacy latent in the Natural Dualism of uncritical common-sense, has to face the wonder-waking question, What in truth does objectivity then mean, since "existence," per se and apart from being apprehended by intelligence, is not really thinkable?—what is it for a judgment, whether perceptive or reflective, to be "objective "?”

Have you ever had to force yourself to be passionate about something in life? by [deleted] in CasualConversation

[–]nijyttk8 2 points  

it sounds like you were looking for "enthusiasm", not "passion". However, passion is a fine "tip" if you want to find enthusiasm.

https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=ssl&ei=WyewVvX0LeSD8QfAsovgBw#q=passion+etymology :

Middle English: from Old French, from late Latin passio(n-) (chiefly a term in Christian theology), from Latin pati ‘suffer.’

https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=ssl&ei=QiiwVpz0A-aD8Qeu6YvACw#q=enthusiasm+etymology :

early 17th century (sense 2): from French enthousiasme, or via late Latin from Greek enthousiasmos, from enthous ‘possessed by a god, inspired’ (based on theos ‘god’).

master Howison's "The Limits of Evolution"?

Daley Plaza - Picasso, Lighted Tree, Atheist A by [deleted] in atheism

[–]nijyttk8 1 point  

/u/TotesMessenger ,

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

Daley Plaza - Picasso, Lighted Tree, Atheist A by [deleted] in chicago

[–]nijyttk8 1 point  

o-LnLv6PRow5LdF84OlpBAPHT4S2AbEvEmA9X199f_CE

view more: ‹ prevnext ›

https://www.reddit.com/user/nijyttk8?count=50&after=t1_cyfg2gv

sorted by:
new

1:4 Scale Model of Chicago in Minecraft Update by lukep323 in Minecraft

[–]nijyttk8 0 points  

uncond!t!on4lly

I've bee building this map all by myself for the past year. This is a follow-up from this post. As you can see, the map has almost doubled in size. You can download the map here. I hope you enjoy!

[https://www.reddit.com/user/lukep323](O.P.)

This pretty lady is coming to live with us in 2 days-too much excitement!!!!! by elephantastronomer in TrollXChromosomes

[–]nijyttk8 2 points  

Congratulations on your new fur baby!

Congratulations on your new fur baby! doggy overlord!

Congratulations on your new fur baby! doggy overlor "my ways are - 4rf, 4rf 4rf - not your ways" d!

Daley Plaza - Picasso, Lighted Tree, Atheist A by [deleted] in atheism

[–]nijyttk8 2 points  

"In the middle of Chicago is a flat place one hundred meters by fifty meters

...

It is a place waiting for a spirit

        the spirit in a sculpture

                      will [h4lcyon] do [it](http://lshdesign.com/firm-profile/about-us/history/item/271-1963-picasso-poem)?"

Daley Plaza - Picasso, Lighted Tree, Atheist A by [deleted] in chicago

[–]nijyttk8 1 point  

/u/reddittor (in full),

4theism says atheists haven't met their burden of proof

4Theism is using it's own definitions of atheism and thereby creating straw men.

If the atheist position is "I don't believe you", then what proof do you need that they don't believe you?

If atheists claim there is no god, then they do have the burden of proof. This is a positive claim, therefore they have the burden of proof. Some, but not all atheists make this claim.

Theists say there is a god, so they have the burden of proof.

Atheists say "we don't believe the theistic claim", thus leaving the burden of proof on the theist positive claim that a god exists.

I am glad you have conceded the point about whether atheism is the belief that there is no god vs. atheism being a rejection of theistic claims. There's a big difference and that is a question of who has the burden of proof.

Of course the theists want to put the burden of proof on atheists to prove there is no god, just like alien abductees want the alien abduction disbelievers to prove there are no aliens.

If you say you were abducted by aliens, then the burden of proof is on you.

If I say I don't believe you, I am not stating that aliens don't or cannot exist. I am saying there isn't enough evidence for me to believe your extra-terrestrial claims.

If I say no aliens exist, then it's up to me to prove they don't exist anywhere in the universe.

You can choose to reject claims about ET visits without claiming that ET don't exist at all.

Atheists reject the claims about god existing without claiming that god doesn't exist at all.

There are 3 positions: 1. god exists; 2. god doesn't exist; or 3. we can't determine if it's #1 or #2.

Atheists can exist in camp #2 or #3.

some comment(s), in line:

4theism says atheists haven't met their burden of proof

4Theism is using it's own definitions of atheism and thereby creating straw men.

proof?

If the atheist position is "I don't believe you", then what proof do you need that they don't believe you?

prove there is "you"?

If atheists claim there is no god, then they do have the burden of proof. This is a positive claim, therefore they have the burden of proof. Some, but not all atheists make this claim.

atheist?

Theists say there is a god, so they have the burden of proof.

4theists do it gladly

Atheists say "we don't believe the theistic claim", thus leaving the burden of proof on the theist positive claim that a god exists.

"we"?

I am glad you have conceded the point about whether atheism is the belief that there is no god vs. atheism being a rejection of theistic claims. There's a big difference and that is a question of who has the burden of proof.

possession arrow?

Of course the theists want to put the burden of proof on atheists to prove there is no god, just like alien abductees want the alien abduction disbelievers to prove there are no aliens.

speak for yourself, my son.

If you say you were abducted by aliens, then the burden of proof is on you.

proof?

If I say I don't believe you, I am not stating that aliens don't or cannot exist. I am saying there isn't enough evidence for me to believe your extra-terrestrial claims.

by what right do you claim the name of God (I~am)?

If I say no aliens exist, then it's up to me to prove they don't exist anywhere in the universe.

universe?proof?

You can choose to reject claims about ET visits without claiming that ET don't exist at all.

I am (Indoctrinate) Freedom;

Atheists reject the claims about god existing without claiming that god doesn't exist at all.

"A"?

There are 3 positions: 1. god exists; 2. god doesn't exist; or 3. we can't determine if it's #1 or #2.

sure of yourself much?

Atheists can exist in camp #2 or #3.

atheism is automoronic

Daley Plaza - Picasso, Lighted Tree, Atheist A by [deleted] in chicago

[–]nijyttk8 1 point  

4theism says atheists haven't met their burden of proof;

gnostic 4theist - knows atheism is automoronic

Best fan made video for a song. Actual "crying, bullshit, etc." by ShakesJr in goodforslothians

[–]nijyttk8 1 point  

/u/ShakesJr , /r/science, reader,

https://youtu.be/49Gz0Jfp-jI?t=3m16s

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lilasquad/pXudkuYNMUk/W94sQhPUCQAJ

“This exaltation of man over the entire natural world, however, though easily shown to accord with the teaching of Jesus, and to be clearly prefigured in it, is nearly antipodal to the ordinary notions, to the current popular ‘philosophy’ assumed to be founded on science, and to much of traditional theology. But by this fact we must not be disturbed, if we mean to be in earnest about [‘for God so loved’] human freedom and human capability of life really moral and religious. And the next step in our inquiry will reinforce this ‘divinising of the human’ very decidedly.”-George Holmes Howison, “The Limits of Evolution”, p.326

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lilasquad/0Qon7Bx2C-c/cYUkX9m5zKYJ

http://www.ncnr.nist.gov/acns/images/image127.jpg

http://web.archive.org/web/20151214210439/https://www.reddit.com/r/catholic

https://03737176267060628600.googlegroups.com/attach/d65ff6a0feb9325/5thMRP-Discuss%20-%20Google%20Groups.htm?part=0.1&view=1&vt=ANaJVrELX98CJxpyQ29I181KUaleOxV54FrvwOVsIAgJrjSOrobg-3C-A4v1q2BvEKEkV-ziriwqeUhK0E7Ako-fjiIVdGGfi0plI3gEZNE8CDtSJffX6cY by nijyttk8 in Righteous

[–]nijyttk8[S] 1 point  

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lilasquad/qbpcWJjLXiA/nqEcaY0MhR0J

Surrender and fullfilment

Only God can welcome a person's total surrender in such a way that one does not lose one's soul in the process but wins it. And only God can bestow Himself upon a person so that He fulfills this being completely and loses nothing of Himself in so doing.

Edith Stein,

"The objector who would open [that's comical, for those who get it] the eternal permanence of the soul to doubt, then, must assail the proofs of a priori knowledge; for so long as these remain free from suspicion, there can be no real question as to what they finally imply."-George Holmes Howison, "The Limits of Evolution, and other essays, illustrating the metaphysical theory of personal idealism", p.308.

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/ctmu-discussion/0IibchAqP08/Xpv_WF1ajbEJ

view more: ‹ prevnext ›

https://www.reddit.com/user/nijyttk8?count=75&after=t3_31hfa2

sorted by:
new

Faces of Religion - Nolipsism (Link) by Pt-Ir_parsec in FacesOfReligion

[–]nijyttk8 1 point  

R%Q: "Interesting. Consider, does it matter, so long as we are having the experience?"

http://www.thepersonalistproject.org/about_us/member_profile/1038

WNBA, Consider"Skylar Diggins - Courage in the Face of Adversity | Clean & Clear letting them shoot they free_throws wit two balls simultaneously?

Remeber, never forget by onawim in goodforslothians

[–]nijyttk8 1 point  

Re: /r/goodforslothians/comments/2u74ww/remeber_never_forget/cpjxl4s

poor lil dunkey; well, anyway, hap laid up cake day, /u/onawim

P.S. some darqq ass bullshite what's goin on with (not only) my browser and redditlog.

[Reddit: you are doing that too much. try again in 36 seconds.]

whatchu talkin bout?

view more: ‹ prev

https://www.reddit.com/user/nijyttk8/submitted/

sorted by:
new

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy (updated). © 2016 reddit inc. All rights reserved.

REDDIT and th
...

CccnAvfLPvExXDeiovnCv1o*redd.it/2u8d22~~^~~2u7io?*

unread,
Apr 28, 2016, 5:06:04 AM4/28/16
to cxmplxplura

CccnAvfLPvExXDeiovnCv1o*redd.it/2u8d22~~^~~2u7io?*

unread,
Apr 28, 2016, 5:08:21 AM4/28/16
to cxmplxplura

CccnAvfLPvExXDeiovnCv1o*redd.it/2u8d22~~^~~2u7io?*

unread,
Apr 30, 2016, 11:06:46 PM4/30/16
to cxmplxplura

Is God sentient? by mobydikc in ELINT

[–]nijyttk8 1 point  

CccnAvfLPvExXDeiovnCv1o*redd.it/2u8d22~~^~~2u7io?*

unread,
May 6, 2016, 10:20:00 PM5/6/16
to cxmplxplura
[[1 Corinthians 1:28]](https://np.reddit.com/r/Christanity2/comments/4bvc9i/sandalscgnl899httpsnpredditcomrchristianitycomment/d1v9qvz?context=3) by nijyttk8 in spiritfilledbelievers

[–]nijyttk8[S] 1 point  

To be sure,

my (edited) comment: np.reddit.com/r/Christanity2/comments/4bvc9i/sandalscgnl899httpsnpredditcomrchristianitycomment/d1cs2ld

and while archived (post edit): http://web.archive.org/web/20160325061402/https://www.reddit.com/r/Christanity2/comments/4bvc9i/sandalscgnl899httpsnpredditcomrchristianitycomment/

and (while) pre-edit: http://web.archive.org/web/20160325060729/https://www.reddit.com/r/Christanity2/comments/4bvc9i/sandalscgnl899httpsnpredditcomrchristianitycomment/

was followed by the referenced's own admission elsewhere: np.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/4cjazq/having_a_problem_with_listening_to_others_talk/d1iqjkl

archived: http://web.archive.org/web/20160330193735/https://www.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/4cjazq/having_a_problem_with_listening_to_others_talk/d1iqjkl

and, I would have posted this under my own comment there, except the user, who is the creator and mod of that sub, has expressed his patience wearing thin. That is: I am not speaking behind his back - or, at least, not what I wouldn't have said to his face had I not assented to his thrust. (Not to say never- GOD Bless!)

"only one good thing worth trying to be- and that's Love."

    P.S. this thread has no front door in this sub.

Are mental illnesses a social construct? by Stillaliveage89 in SocialEngineering

[–]nijyttk8 1 point  

George Howison proved that all phenomena – viz. “biology”, “chemistry”, “physics” – are “social constructs”

neither will Jesus’ personal – “I am”/“tat tvam asi” – cross be “deconstructed” impersonal “matter”

Dream I had before becoming a believer. by rainmayyetcome in Christianity

[–]nijyttk8 1 point  



Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages