Re: Instead of the OC Register Forums?
6 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Clarity
Jun 17, 2008, 1:36:07 AM6/17/08
to CUSD
Works for me...lets see if we get any critical mass.
On Jun 16, 6:24 pm, jimr <j...@cdvinc.com> wrote:
> It's your choice.
On Jun 16, 6:24 pm, jimr <j...@cdvinc.com> wrote:
> It's your choice.
mv parent
Jun 17, 2008, 3:00:56 AM6/17/08
to CUSD
Just remember that your e-mail is visible in your posts.
If you prefer that everyone not see it, just create a gmail
account and use that to join the group.
If you prefer that everyone not see it, just create a gmail
account and use that to join the group.
NH.W...@gmail.com
Jun 17, 2008, 10:25:27 PM6/17/08
to CUSD
I was asked by the Register forum moderator to remove the link to this
site from my signature line.
They don't want this site promoted.
It is amusing that Yeeha and A-POV think that the Register site
provides them with anonymity. The Register logs everyone's IP address
every time they post.
site from my signature line.
They don't want this site promoted.
It is amusing that Yeeha and A-POV think that the Register site
provides them with anonymity. The Register logs everyone's IP address
every time they post.
Message has been deleted
mv parent
Jun 17, 2008, 11:04:58 PM6/17/08
to CUSD
On Jun 17, 7:25 pm, NH.We...@gmail.com wrote:
> I was asked by the Register forum moderator to remove the link to this
> site from my signature line.
> They don't want this site promoted.
>
Sometimes I just wonder what country I'm living in. Hooray for Free
Speech.
The links in my messages are still there, and I haven't heard from her
yet. Maybe my posts will just mysteriously disappear.
> It is amusing that Yeeha and A-POV think that the Register site
> provides them with anonymity. The Register logs everyone's IP address
> every time they post.
unconstitutional requests from the government for search record data
(and won). I believe
that if the OC Register got a request from a lawyer for IP records of
posters, they would hand them over in a heartbeat.
NH.W...@gmail.com
Jun 18, 2008, 1:05:52 AM6/18/08
to CUSD
She said the OCRegister objected to promoting other sites. When I
gave her examples of other posters who had sites in their signature
lines, she said they weren't her concern and the OCR had the right to
modify or delete anything for any reason. True enuff.
Hey! Its their party.
bowman
Jun 19, 2008, 9:28:28 AM6/19/08
to CUSD
The June 17th Board meeting, in addition to the dog and pony, included
the following:
1. Groundwork was laid for supporting that the risk due to the
pipeline is very low. SJHHS will stay open since the risk is of an
acceptable level. The phd consulatant expressed that worst case,
only
approx. 10,000 gallons could be released in the event of a pipeline
breach, and there was no way it could reach the school. There was no
discussion about whether CUSD would still select that site, with the
public knowing what they now know.
2. Several pro-CUSD administration advocates spoke of: the hostile
take-over of CUSD by the Recall group, the insidious Education
Alliance ties, the waste of the $700,000 for the Recall election, the
puppet reform Trustees, that the reform Trustees shirked their
responsibility by leaving the last meeting (regardless of their
concerns that the Brown Act was being violated), and the pending
firing of Carter and replacement by someone affiliated with the
Recall. Of course, none of these allegations were based on anything
of substance.
3. Draper took the opportunity to express that she took the time to
fiill out the PTA questionaire, which had very benign questions, such
as whether they support vouchers or not. Draper expressed she is
against vouchers.
4. Draper pandered to classified employees, expressing she wanted to
hire them all back, if there was any way she could.
5. Benecke tried to put forth a motion that all the Trustees forego
their stipend, but was informed by legal counsel that she could not
do
that since it was not on the agenda.
6. Bryson requested of Carter to provide a break-down of all the
millions of dollars being spent on consultants by CUSD, to possibly
re-
direct those funds to hire classified employees back.
7. No reprieve was given for RIFed classified employees.
8. No reprieve was given for RIFed psychologists.
9. Carter expressed that the budget next year will be worse than
this
year, and California is the 49th on its way to the 50th worst state
in
the union for funding education.
bowman
the following:
1. Groundwork was laid for supporting that the risk due to the
pipeline is very low. SJHHS will stay open since the risk is of an
acceptable level. The phd consulatant expressed that worst case,
only
approx. 10,000 gallons could be released in the event of a pipeline
breach, and there was no way it could reach the school. There was no
discussion about whether CUSD would still select that site, with the
public knowing what they now know.
2. Several pro-CUSD administration advocates spoke of: the hostile
take-over of CUSD by the Recall group, the insidious Education
Alliance ties, the waste of the $700,000 for the Recall election, the
puppet reform Trustees, that the reform Trustees shirked their
responsibility by leaving the last meeting (regardless of their
concerns that the Brown Act was being violated), and the pending
firing of Carter and replacement by someone affiliated with the
Recall. Of course, none of these allegations were based on anything
of substance.
3. Draper took the opportunity to express that she took the time to
fiill out the PTA questionaire, which had very benign questions, such
as whether they support vouchers or not. Draper expressed she is
against vouchers.
4. Draper pandered to classified employees, expressing she wanted to
hire them all back, if there was any way she could.
5. Benecke tried to put forth a motion that all the Trustees forego
their stipend, but was informed by legal counsel that she could not
do
that since it was not on the agenda.
6. Bryson requested of Carter to provide a break-down of all the
millions of dollars being spent on consultants by CUSD, to possibly
re-
direct those funds to hire classified employees back.
7. No reprieve was given for RIFed classified employees.
8. No reprieve was given for RIFed psychologists.
9. Carter expressed that the budget next year will be worse than
this
year, and California is the 49th on its way to the 50th worst state
in
the union for funding education.
bowman
bowman
Jun 22, 2008, 11:31:05 PM6/22/08
to CUSD
The OC Register forum is really heating up. With all the personal
attacks flying, I'm surprised it hasn't been yanked already. The anti-
Recall crowd is really pulling out all the stops. It's turning into
an all-out street fight.
On Jun 16, 10:36 pm, Clarity <m...@winsten.com> wrote:
> Works for me...lets see if we get any critical mass.
>
> On Jun 16, 6:24 pm, jimr <j...@cdvinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > It's your choice.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
attacks flying, I'm surprised it hasn't been yanked already. The anti-
Recall crowd is really pulling out all the stops. It's turning into
an all-out street fight.
On Jun 16, 10:36 pm, Clarity <m...@winsten.com> wrote:
> Works for me...lets see if we get any critical mass.
>
> On Jun 16, 6:24 pm, jimr <j...@cdvinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Jim Reardon
Jun 22, 2008, 11:47:47 PM6/22/08
to cu...@googlegroups.com
Agreed. It is truly amazing how far some people will go.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages