In the course “Write Like Mozart”, Angela K Baxter asked this question:
“From a compositional perspective, does anyone have any thoughts on Mozart's musical joke, K522?
http://youtu.be/wFPoRmsiFzc
Watch out for the end of the last movement, it's a doozy.”
What I answered could be mentioned here too:
“I've read that Mozart is mocking the bad composers of his time in that piece of music.
All I'm going to write here is just my personal opinion.
As I started listening to it right now, I started laughing because instead of a smooth development of the feelings expressed (and analyzed deeply), you hear a clumsy development with melodies that move, stop abruptly, and then continue moving again without any idea of where they're heading. Many times the harmony is full of dissonances. The feelings expressed do not evolve in a reasonable manner. Mozart seems to be ridiculizing the work of a composer that has no objectives in mind when composing music and also doesn't have a clue of what he's doing; but it's expressed in a very funny way.
The interesting thing is that despite the fact that it's a composition filled with ridiculizations of a bad composition, "A Musical Joke" is somehow very beautiful music. Only a genius like Mozart can do this. There's a rusty dissonance throughout the work, but even that is beautiful.
Probably part of Mozart's statement in this mockery could be:
1. When answering a musical phrase, don't over do it (or under do it); justify it. Look for an equilibrium.
2. Feelings expressed in music should evolve fluidly; they cannot simply appear and disappear as if by magic.
3. Do not leave ideas unfinished (and be creative).
4. Musical phrases should be as short or long as needed. Justify their length.
5. Consonances are preferred over dissonances (in this historic time).
6. Melodies lead someplace. First think of where you want your melody to go (define your objective) and after that find a creative way to get there.
7. Have an overall idea of your intentions in the composition
A few observations:
The beginning could have been a good idea, but the parts don't fit smoothly against each other. When you think about what feelings are being expressed, it's such a poor expression that it's hilarious.
In 0:03 the viola and the basso support the melody too late creating a double rise in the melody that's kind of clumsy and does not make sense (in my opinion, this is crucial to the mockery of the beginning).
In 0:10 the music answers in an extremely happy and fast manner (unjustified) and ends in 0:15 with the same clumsy and unrelated motive of the beginning.
In 0:16 the music starts fine but there's nothing before to justify it.
The melody in 5:23 probably ridiculizes a melody that should have simply been scratched out......It's horrible!! It's a development of a theme, but very dissonant. It sounds as if it's describing something shrinking, when a melody should express something beautiful or interesting.
The melody in 6:41 is long and fluid but it's just moving in the scale without expressing anything and it ends up abruptly. I have no idea about what it's trying to describe, and as soon as it ends it starts all over again (identical) and I still have no idea what it's trying to describe.
Although the melody in the beginning of the fourth movement is indeed very beautiful, in 16:06, (one of my favorite all-time-themes), the harmonies are kind of dissonant.
The sound of the instrument in 16:53. and in 18:54 is probably mockery too. How can this contribute positively to the expression of feelings in the music? Normally you see this in an exciting part of the music, but here it's in a place that's not that exciting and it sound very dissonant.
The last three dissonant chords are also a mockery, but again, if you listen to them carefully, they are beautiful.
Many more things can be said, but in general it's still a fantastic composition, despite the mockery. This is deffinitelly the work of a genius.”