...Liberals see Welfare as a tool for balancing the playing field, a mechanism for giving the poorest among us the resources necessary to just to get by.
Conservatives see Welfare as a device that unfairly redirects earning from the paychecks of the hardworking, straight into the wallets of the lazy and unmotivated.
Diametrically opposed interpretations, right? Both camps look at the same institution, the same program, but see two very different things.
But what if I was to tell you that BOTH of these narratives INTRINSICALLY incorrect? That neither of these viewpoints can be true based on their own merits?
Both liberals and conservatives miss the mark when it comes to the Welfare debate. Why? Simple:
"Welfare" as people talk about it – the indefinite doling out of cash directly into the hands of the poor – DOES NOT EVEN EXIST. It's an urban legend, a fairy tale...and yet, that doesn't seem to stop the political among us from developing strong opinions of it, does it?...