Fwd: NARSOL & WVRSOL File Second Federal Lawsuit Challenging West Virginia’s $125 Annual Registry Fee

13 views
Skip to first unread message

Spike CO

unread,
Jun 21, 2026, 2:32:02 AMJun 21
to CURE-SORT Google Group


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: NARSOL <communi...@narsol.org>
Date: Sat, Jun 20, 2026 at 10:15 AM
Subject: NARSOL & WVRSOL File Second Federal Lawsuit Challenging West Virginia’s $125 Annual Registry Fee



NARSOL logo

By Philip

Charleston, WV – June 17, 2026 – The National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws (NARSOL) has filed a second federal Large tan stone courthouse with tall windows and an American flag flying in front.lawsuit in the Southern District of West Virginia challenging the state law that imposes a $125 annual fee on individuals required to register as sex offenders.

The lawsuit, Basham et al. v. Mitchell, filed on behalf of West Virginia’s 6,450 registrants, argues that the fee, which became effective on January 1, 2026, constitutes an unconstitutional punitive fine rather than a legitimate administrative cost.

The Challenge

Under W. Va. Code Ann. § 15-12-2(o), registrants must pay $125 annually or face property liens, regardless of their ability to pay. The state expects the fee to generate over $800,000 per year.

Where the Money Goes

According to the complaint, none of the collected fees are earmarked for sex offender registration functions. Instead, the funds will:

  • first support mental health counselors, seminars, and training for current and former West Virginia state police employees—whether or not they work with the registry;
  • then fund any other expenses “essential to the general operations of the State Police.”

The complaint emphasizes that no fees will be used for “sex offender notification, registration, verification, or compliance.”

Constitutional Claims

The complaint, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, raises an Ex Post Facto constitutional claim.

Ex Post Facto Clause (U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 10)

  • Unlike the earlier Kaso v. Mitchell case, this lawsuit does not assert claims under the Eighth Amendment, the Due Process Clause, or the Equal Protection Clause. Instead, it focuses exclusively on the Ex Post Facto Clause.
  • Plaintiffs argue that the annual fee constitutes a retroactive punishment because it was enacted in 2025 and later amended in 2026, long after their convictions and sentences became final.
  • The complaint contends that the fee is not a genuine regulatory fee but rather a punitive fine because:
    • It is imposed solely because of a past criminal conviction;
    • It can be imposed annually, often for life;
    • Nonpayment triggers a judgment lien against the registrant’s property;
    • Revenue is used for state police mental health programs and general operations rather than registry administration.
  • Plaintiffs further argue that the statute fails the punitive-effects analysis described in Smith v. Doe and Mendoza-Martinez, asserting that it resembles punishment in purpose and effect.

About NARSOL & WVRSOL

The National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws is a civil rights organization dedicated to promoting evidence-based policies and constitutional protections for individuals affected by sex offense laws.

West Virginians for Rational Sexual Offense Laws is NARSOL’s West Header banner for West Virginians for Rational Sexual Offense Laws (WVRSOL): large WVRSOL acronym over a bridge image, with the subtitle about reform and a right-side block containing a Divine Providence quote.Virginia state affiliate that advocates for registered citizens in West Virginia. They are working to make the 2020s a decade known for criminal justice reform, rational sexual offense laws, and restorative justice.



Please support NARSOL as we fight
to eliminate dehumanizing and
oppressive registry laws.


Donate button

NARSOl Logo Banner
P.O. Box 36123
Albuquerque, NM 87176
United States


website    Facebook    X    Youtube


Unsubscribe - Privacy Statement
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages