Dear CA Nowfal and fellow members,
Thank you for sharing the proposed model for views.
**Summary of the structure (as understood)**
- Pvt. Ltd. company runs multiple groups of 20 members each.
- Every member contributes ₹5,000 per month.
- One member is selected each month by lucky draw and receives benefits aggregating ₹1.5 lakh (₹50,000 gold immediately + ₹1 lakh cash staggered at ₹2,000 × 50 months).
- The company retains/invests the balance collections in other businesses.
**Regulatory assessment – high risk**
1. **Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978**
The model has strong elements of a “prize chit”: periodical subscriptions collected from a fixed group of members, determination of the recipient by lot/draw, and distribution of prizes/gifts (cash + kind) while the promoter retains surplus. Such arrangements are expressly banned. Participation or promotion attracts penal consequences.
2. **Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 (BUDS Act)**
Section 6 deems any prize chit or money-circulation scheme banned under the 1978 Act to be an Unregulated Deposit Scheme. Acceptance or solicitation of deposits under an UDS is prohibited. The company would be treated as a “deposit taker” and exposed to attachment of assets, prosecution, and restitution orders.
3. **Chit Funds Act, 1982**
A pure conventional chit (all subscribers eventually receive the net chit amount in turn, determined by lot/auction/tender, with the foreman entitled only to a fixed commission) can be conducted by a company after obtaining prior sanction from the State Government, registration of the chit agreement, maintenance of prescribed capital/reserve, and ongoing compliance.
The present model diverges significantly: only one member per cycle receives a fixed “benefit” package, the company freely invests the surplus, and there is no clear mechanism ensuring every subscriber eventually gets an equivalent return. It is therefore unlikely to qualify as a regulated chit and would fall outside the safe harbour of the 1982 Act.
4. **Other statutes**
- Companies Act, 2013 – possible issues under acceptance of deposits (Chapter V) if the contributions are characterised as deposits.
- RBI / SEBI – residual risk if the activity is viewed as a collective investment scheme or non-banking financial activity without registration.
- State-specific money-circulation / lottery laws may also apply.
**Practical view**
I have not come across any sustainable, fully compliant private-company structure that mirrors this exact “lucky-draw + partial payout + company retains surplus” model. Attempts to run similar schemes have historically attracted regulatory action under the 1978 Act and, post-2019, under the BUDS Act.
**Recommendation**
Advise the client strongly against implementing the model in its present form. If the commercial objective is a regulated rotating savings arrangement, the only viable path is a fully compliant chit under the Chit Funds Act, 1982 (with State Government sanction, registered agreements, prescribed capital, audited accounts, etc.). Even then, the payout structure would need to be redesigned so that every subscriber eventually receives the net chit amount.
Happy to discuss further offline if useful.
on a professional engagement basisThanks & regards
CA Chandrasekaran Ramadurai
FCA, FCMA, ACS
Chartered Accountant & Insolvency Professional
Membership No. 027220
Firm Regn No. 018861S
Insolvency Professional – IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P-02699/2022-2023/14150
Thanks & regards
CA
Chandrasekaran Ramadurai FCA, FCMA, ACS
Chartered Accountant, Insolvency
Professional
Membership No. 027220 Firm Regn No. 018861S,
Insolvency Professional - IBBI/IPA-001/IP- P/00834/2017-18/11392
Sole Proprietor: C Ramadurai &
CO | Chartered Accountants,
JP Nagar, Bangalore 560078
Areas
of Specialization: Taxation- Structuring, Compliance & Litigation, Commercial
Contracts and Due Diligence
Mobile: 779 505 0177| Phone: +91 80 4202 3319
https://www.linkedin.com/in/fca-chandrasekaran-ramadurai-undefined-2450a2385/
If you are not the intended user , please delete the mail and there shall be no liability on the sender