--
--
************************************************
Mail your comments, feedback and suggestions on CSMysore to Moderator: datta...@gmail.com and Manager: vivekhe...@gmail.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CSMysore" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to csmysore+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Dear Friend,
Sec. 185 is SPECIFIC in nature and Sec. 186 is GENERAL in nature.
Hence, first the transaction is required to be screened/filtered from the ‘acid test’ of Sec. 185 and if it does not attracts, then Sec. 186 will have to be looked into.
Thanks & regards,
CS. Premnarayan Tripathi
PRT & Associates,
Company Secretaries
201, Sarthik Square, Nr. GNFC Info Tower,
S G Highway, Ahmedabad - 380054
(M): +91 89800 26497
E-mail: premnar...@gmail.com
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Ankit Vageriya ( Company Secretary)
Mobile: +91-9327610869
š Email : ankit@polylinkpolymers.com
POLYLINK POLYMERS ( I ) LTD
506, Saffron Building, Nr. Centre Point,
Ambawadi, Ahmedabad-380006
( Tel : +91 79 26565200/26427800
7 Fax : +91 79 26421864
" www.polylinkpolymers.com
Dear Balaji,
Thanks Balaji for your views.
Whether 186 (2) clearly clarifies the position of loans to inter corporate companies irrespective of common or interested directors?
Though it says, save as otherwise provided in the act, it is not clearly mentioned in 186(2) about interested directors or common directors.
It just refers "give loan to any person" which allows us to interpret as enabling provision! It could have been specific.
In the other side, if 186 (2) is an enabling provision, why there is prohibiting provision in 185 in the name of directors interest. (Infact specific explanation is mentioned about the meaning for " to any person in whom director is intetested" means).
Clarity from MCA would enable us to be more clear on this very important provision.
regards
Mani