--
Find eNewsletters of ICSI Mysore at: http://www.icsi.edu/NewsEvents/enewsletters/tabid/1757/Default.aspx AND www.esnips.com/web/icsimysore
You received this message as you are subscriber. To unsubscribe email to: csmysore-u...@googlegroups.com
Dear friends,
1/. Proviso to section 383A[1] of the Act requires the company to file CC with ROC and to attach a copy of CC to its Directors' Report.
Under the scheme of the Act, Directors' Report is required to be attached to the company's Balance Sheet.
2/. It follows that CC will be required at the time of approving and signing Directors' Report.
CC should be procured normally before the approval of Directors' Report so that the Directors can explain their position on the adverse remark, if any, in CC.
Technically, CC can be obtained after Directors' Report is approved and signed,but, before the same is issued because the law requires a copy of CC to be attached to Directors' Report and does not require the copy of CC to be annexed to Directors' Report.
In the given case, at the time of approval of Directors' Report, the company's paid-up capital is Rs.4.5 crores. [ between ten lakh rupees and five crore rupees ] attracting the Proviso to section 383A[1] requiring a copy of CC to be attached to Directors' Report.
3/. As to the implications of the employment of CS by the company till 31-3-2010 on the primary requirement s of obtaining CC from a PCS and attaching a copy of CC to DR under the substantive law comprised in the Proviso to section 383A of the Act, the provisions under the Companies [ Compliance Certificate ] Rules, 2001,but, do not include any relevant implications provided for therein in the matter as to whether a company covered thereunder and employing a qualified CS, voluntarily, is required to obtain CC from a PCS or not.
In the given case, if the company had in employment a qualified CS ,as on 15th March, 2009 who continued in the employment till 31-3-2010, the applicability of the Proviso to Rule 3A of the Companies [ Appointment And Qualifications of Secretary] Rules, 1988, as inserted from 15-3-2009, needs to be considered.It reads:
" Provided that where a company has appointed under sub-rule[3] or this sub-rule,a whole-time secretary, possessing the qualification of membership of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India, such a company is not required to obtain a certificate from a secretary in whole-time practice under Rule 3 of the Companies [Compliance Certificate ] Rules, 2001."
4/. As stated earlier, the applicability to the Proviso to section 383A of the Companies Act, primarily arises at the time of approving, signing and issuing Directors' Report to which a copy of CC is required to be attached.
At that time, the company under reference has no qualified CS employed with it.
5/. The company covered under the Proviso to section 383A[1] has to, for filing with ROC, obtain from a secretary in whole-time practice a certificate as to whether the company has complied with the provisions of this Act and the certificate as such is required to be in be in such form and [ to be filed ]within such time shall be subject to such conditions as may be prescribed and all of which have been prescribed in the Companies [ Compliance Certificate ] Rules, 2001. These CC Rules , made under the powers conferred upon the Central Government under section 383A[1], do not stipulate any condition as to whether or not a company covered thereunder and employing a qualified CS will have to obtain such certificate from a PCS.
6/. Pertinently, the format of CC, referred to in Rule 3[2] of the Companies [ Compliance Certificate ] Rules, 2001 requires the PCS to certify as to whether the company has complied with the specified requirements during the financial year referred to in the format.
It follows that such CC can be obtained only after the conclusion of the relevant financial year [ 31st March, 2010 in the given case ].
7/. Thus, it may be noted that both the primary requirements of obtaining CC from a PCS and also that of attaching a copy of CC to Directors' Report , as provided for in the Proviso to section 383A[1] and the Rules made thereunder , envisage CC being obtained and filed AFTER the conclusion of the relevant financial year and in the given case, the Company does not have a qualified CS in employment and, therefore, it may be safe to conclude that the company under reference is required to obtain CC from a PCS.
8/. Another l interpretation of the above may take into consideration all the aspects involved and thereafter may conclude that the company, not required to employ a whole-time secretary, having voluntarily appointed a qualified CS who continued in employment throughout FY 2009-10 might not have been required to obtain CC[ per the Proviso to Rule 3A referred to in item 3 hereof, had the qualified CS continued after the conclusion FY 2009-10 and particularly till the point of time when the requirement of obtaining CC from a PCS arose.