Loan by subsidiary to Holding co

4,067 views
Skip to first unread message

Kaliappagounder Muthusamy

unread,
Jan 27, 2011, 2:34:46 AM1/27/11
to csmy...@googlegroups.com
Views solicited on the following case:
 
 
H Pvt Ltd  - Holding company (99% shares held)
S Ltd       -  Subsidiary
 
Bothe have common directors
 
S Ltd want to advance loan to H Pvt Ltd
 
Will it attract section 295 ? 
 If so what have to done to advnce loan to H Pvt Ltd
 
Applicability of other sections like 297, 372A may be high lighted
--
K.Muthusamy B.Com,FICWA,FCS
JMACS ASSOCIATES
Company Secretaries in Practice
Lakshya 2nd Floor, 1056/1 Avinashi Raod
Coimbatore-641018
0422-4391973, 0422-4204791
On move: 94433 -71791

Ramaswami Mohan

unread,
Jan 27, 2011, 5:38:19 AM1/27/11
to csmy...@googlegroups.com
 upsream loan(subsidiary to holding) not permitted u/s 295(1)(a) without CG approval.
regards,
 
Mohan
============================================


--
Find eNewsletters of ICSI Mysore at: http://www.icsi.edu/NewsEvents/enewsletters/tabid/1757/Default.aspx AND www.esnips.com/web/icsimysore
 
You received this message as you are subscriber. To unsubscribe email to: csmysore-u...@googlegroups.com

Vivek Aggarwal

unread,
Jan 27, 2011, 6:09:23 AM1/27/11
to csmy...@googlegroups.com
Dear Muthusamy

This Loan is exempted under Section 295 (2) (b).

 372A (8) (c ) exempts if loan is made to wholly owned subsidiary
 
There is no exemption under Section 297.

Regards
CS Vivek Aggarwal

From: Kaliappagounder Muthusamy <kmut...@gmail.com>
To: csmy...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, 27 January, 2011 1:04:46 PM
Subject: [CSMysore] Loan by subsidiary to Holding co

nidhi goel

unread,
Jan 27, 2011, 6:17:38 AM1/27/11
to csmy...@googlegroups.com
Hello!

It would attract Sec 295, as its rightly pointed out by Mr. Mohan that upstream loan is nt exempted.....U/S 295 2(b) loan given by holding to subsidiary is exempted.......nt the vice versa........

So, i dont think so its exempted............

Rest other views are solicited.


--
With Regards


Nidhi Goel
Company Secretary.
Nidhi Goel & Co.
Ph: 9811628703

Mohd Arshad

unread,
Jan 27, 2011, 8:32:00 AM1/27/11
to csmy...@googlegroups.com
Dear Muthusamy,

Nidhi is absolutely correct.

Because section 295 is also drafted to check the undue influence of
the board of holding company on the board of subsidiary company.
However the board of the holding company can not be deemed to be
influenced by the board of subsidiary company.

Other views are solicited

With Regards

Mohd. Arshad

CS A Rengarajan

unread,
Jan 27, 2011, 8:39:14 PM1/27/11
to csmy...@googlegroups.com
I am differ with Mr.Vivek  that  Section 295 (2) (b)  talks about

(b) any loan made by a holding company to its subsidiary company;]

In the given case other way around that is subsidiary is giving loan  to holding company.  There is no question of exemption under section 295 (2) (b)

Kindly go through check list of Section 295 for better clarity  source lexivedhi.com

Loan to Directors and the Provisions of the Companies Act

Loans to the direcotors of the company given by the company are governed by section 295 of the companies act, 1956. Section 295 put restrictions on a public company or a private company being a subsidiary of a public company intending to make any type of transaction with a director of the company or partner or relative of a director, etc. whether, directly or indirectly to make any loan, or to give any guarantee, or to provide any security in connection with a loan made by any other person to, or to any other person by, and it calls for obtaining the previous approval of the Central Government. This section is applicable to a public company or a private company, which is a subsidiary of a public company.

Exemption

(a) Private Company which is not a subsidiary of public company;

(b) Banking Company;

(c) Government Company'

(d) Loan made by holding company to its subsidiary company;

(e) Guarantee given or security provided by holding company in respect of any loan made to its subsidiary company

Persons covered under section 295

(a) Any director of the lending company;

(b) Any director of the holding company;

(c) Any partner of any such director;

(d) Any relative of any such director;

(e) Any firm in which any such director is a partner;

(f) Any firm in which a relative of such a director is a partner;

(g) Any private company of which any such director is a director;

(h) Any private company of which any such director is a member;

(i) any body corporate of which not less than 25% of the total voting power may be exercised or controlled t a general meeting by any director or by two or more directors together; and

(ii) any body corporate, the Board of directors, managing director or manager whereof is accustomed to act in accordance with the directions or instructions of the Board, or of any director or directors, of the lending company

.

Non-applicability of the provisions of section 295

  • any loan made to an employee of the company, who is not a relative of any director;
  • any loan or advance made to a trust in which directors are trustees;
  • any quasi-loan;
  • any advance or deposit made in connection with leasing/hire-purchase transaction;
  • any advance payment of salary given to an employee who is a relative of a director as per the rules of the company;
  • any investment made in acquiring residential accommodation for director(s) (whether by way of purchase or entering into a lease agreement);
  • house building loan given to a director subject to the guidelines issued for that purpose by the Central Government;
  • any loan made to a Registered Co-operative Society;
  • any loan given by a holding company to any director of its subsidiary company;
  • advance given for services to be rendered or goods to be supplied provided it is reasonable and commensurate with the services to be rendered or goods to be supplied;
  • section 295(1) does not apply to a government company provided that such company has obtained the approval of the Ministry or Department of the Central Government, which is administratively in charge of the company, or as the case may be or the State Government.


--
csarengarajan
Company Secretary, Chennai
email csaren...@gmail.com
mobile 093810 11200
SHARING KNOWLEDGE SKY IS THE LIMIT

This mail and its attachments (if any) are confidential information intended for persons to whom the email is planned for delivery by the sender. If you have received this mail in error please notify the sender of the error by forwarding the email and its attachments (if any) and then deleting the mail received in error and the relevant email trail in this connection without making any copies or taking any prints.

revathy kumar

unread,
Jan 28, 2011, 8:10:14 AM1/28/11
to csmy...@googlegroups.com
Dear all,

My opinion would be,

1. Under Section 295(1)(c), (the holding company being  a private limited company and since the companies have common directors on the Board), S Ltd has to obtain the Central Government's approval

2. Section 297 does not apply in this case, being a loan transaction

3. No exemption under Section 372A is available as the loan is made by the Subsidiary to its Holding company and not the other way round. and hence, if the loan amount exceeds the limits prescribed, the necessary resolutions have to be passed.

Please do correct me if iam wroung

Revathy
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages