BEN-2

[BHAVNA SHARMA]

Dear all,

X Private Limited Company is a wholly owned subsidiary company of Y Private Limited and filed form MGT-6 for said purpose, whether it is also required to file form BEN-2.

what is the difference between Form MGT-6 and BEN-2.

Please suggest.

With Regards

Bhavna Sharma

Company Secretary 

[Peer Mehboob]

MGT-6 is filed under section 89 by the company within 30 days of receipt of declaration about the beneficial interest of shares. BEN-2 is filed under section 90 for filing a  return of Significant Beneficial Ownership within 30 days of receipt of declaration.

--
--
************************************************
Mail your comments, feedback and suggestions on CSMysore to Moderator: datta...@gmail.com and Manager: vivekhe...@gmail.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CSMysore" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to csmysore+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/csmysore/CAAM1DHtZkEOeTKXJWF9c%3DppJC0E5wCxWvQDsAWiOf45NB%2BNcdw%40mail.gmail.com.

[BHAVNA SHARMA]

whether both are required to be filed for same holding.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/csmysore/CAMVq%3DvKcZ-hjw95d6caojEE5d9T1hD55npbsMs7yyiJDThSmow%40mail.gmail.com.

[Peer Mehboob]

Yes. Both forms are required to be filed if the holding is significant beneficial holding.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/csmysore/CAAM1DHtRCROzhUYjaAvPMKx4KukgznfaFtMXoDDEgLXg0M%2BQ2w%40mail.gmail.com.

[N. MR]

The holding company need not file any forms relating to their Wholly owned subsidiary company. BEN forms are not required.

NMR

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/csmysore/CAAM1DHtRCROzhUYjaAvPMKx4KukgznfaFtMXoDDEgLXg0M%2BQ2w%40mail.gmail.com.

[nidhi goel]

Further pl take note in Sec 90, the purpose is to identify the "INDIVIDUAL". In case there is no such "INDIVIDUAL" who is controlling or having significant influence over the entity than disco. under  section 90 is not applicable. 

Regards

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/csmysore/CAGfnDXP4iO%3DBzdq2MFNrkVxToSNcUJWTGiuXgo7a%2BFWxMEuTEg%40mail.gmail.com.

--

Thanks & Regards

Nidhi Goel

Company Secretary.