One of the MGT-14 filed for alteration of articles has been rejected by ROC with the following reasons:
REPLACING ENTIRE AOA IS NOT LEGAL. ONLY REGULATIONS IN AOA CAN BE CHANGED/SUBSTITUTED AND THE CHANGED REGULATIONS SHOULD HAVE BEEN EMBODIED IN THE RESOLUTION. AS THIS DEFICIENCY CANNOT BE RECTIFIED, THIS FILING IS REJECTED.
There has been a change in the definition of 'alteration' in the Companies Act, 2013.
Under the Companies Act, 1956 "alter" and "alteration" shall include the making of additions and omissions.
Under the Companies Act, 2013 “alter” or “alteration” includes the making of additions, omissions and substitutions;
Accordingly, substituting (replacing has the same meaning) of AOA is allowed under new Companies Act, 2013.
Kindly share your views.
Also I am surprised how this form can be rejected since as per the attached circular, form MGT-14 for alteration of AOA is under STP (straight through process) mode.
Warm Regards
CS Vivek Hegde,B.com, FCS, CWA
Vivek Hegde & Co.
Company Secretaries
No. 2034, 26th Cross, K.R.Road
Banashankari II Stage, Behind
Sevakshetra Hospital
Bangalore-560070
Mob : 09900898223
Off: 080 26710667