Rejection of MGT-14 for alteration of AOA

872 views
Skip to first unread message

Vivek Hegde

unread,
Oct 24, 2014, 4:07:52 AM10/24/14
to csmy...@googlegroups.com
Dear Members,

One of the MGT-14 filed for alteration of articles has been rejected by ROC with the following reasons:

REPLACING ENTIRE AOA IS NOT LEGAL. ONLY REGULATIONS IN AOA CAN BE CHANGED/SUBSTITUTED AND THE CHANGED REGULATIONS SHOULD HAVE BEEN EMBODIED IN THE RESOLUTION. AS THIS DEFICIENCY CANNOT BE RECTIFIED, THIS FILING IS REJECTED.

There has been a change in the definition of 'alteration' in the Companies Act, 2013. 

Under the Companies Act, 1956 "alter" and "alteration" shall include the making of additions and omissions.

Under the Companies Act, 2013 “alter” or “alteration” includes the making of additions, omissions and substitutions;

Accordingly, substituting (replacing has the same meaning) of AOA is allowed under new Companies Act, 2013. 

Kindly share your views.

Also I am surprised how this form can be rejected since as per the attached circular, form MGT-14 for alteration of AOA is under STP (straight through process) mode. 

Warm Regards

CS Vivek Hegde,B.com, FCS, CWA

Vivek Hegde & Co.
Company Secretaries
No. 2034, 26th Cross, K.R.Road
Banashankari II Stage, Behind 
Sevakshetra Hospital
Bangalore-560070
Mob : 09900898223
Off: 080 26710667
General_Circular_28_2014.pdf

Rajesh

unread,
Oct 24, 2014, 4:17:00 AM10/24/14
to csmysore

I completely agree with your view on the definition of Alteration, (yes, it also includes "substitution").
But according to ROC, the entire Regulation (i mean the substituted one) should form part and parcel of the Resolution.  I think that is the reason the Form has been rejected.   

Yes, i am also confused with the mode of approval, as per the Circular it is STP.  Only ROC can throw some light on this.


Rgds,


--
--
************************************************
Mail your comments, feedback and suggestions on CSMysore to Moderator: datta...@gmail.com and Manager: vivekhe...@gmail.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CSMysore" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to csmysore+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Jayashree Chandrasekaran

unread,
Oct 24, 2014, 4:23:27 AM10/24/14
to csmysore
Dear Vivek,
I think you must take up this with the ROC
Members of a  company can definitely go in for a new set of articles...whether called substitution or replacement
How can he reject?
At the best he can only put under re-submission
Yes it is definitely under STP mode....there must be some triggers by which some of the MGT-14 would have been open for approval
Jayashree

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Vivek Hegde <vivekhe...@gmail.com> wrote:

--
--
************************************************
Mail your comments, feedback and suggestions on CSMysore to Moderator: datta...@gmail.com and Manager: vivekhe...@gmail.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CSMysore" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to csmysore+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
C.JAYASHREE
PROPRIETOR
S.GANESH&ASSOCIATES
CHENNAI
98840 17120

kiran Bhat

unread,
Oct 24, 2014, 5:06:47 AM10/24/14
to csmy...@googlegroups.com
Dear Vivek,

Same thing was happened with me also. ROC is expecting us to cover entire new aoa to be adopted to cover in the resolution and CTC of the same to be attached with MGT 14.

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Vivek Hegde <vivekhe...@gmail.com> wrote:

--
--
************************************************
Mail your comments, feedback and suggestions on CSMysore to Moderator: datta...@gmail.com and Manager: vivekhe...@gmail.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CSMysore" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to csmysore+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--



CS Kiran N P
Company Secretary in Practice
Ph: 8904759088

Ganga Anil Kumar

unread,
Oct 27, 2014, 12:58:25 AM10/27/14
to csmy...@googlegroups.com
Dear All,

The MGT 14 is STP only under certain Sections, but not in all the cases.

Thanking you,

Warm Regards
CS Anil Kumar Ganga | Chennai | India | +91 87545 95549 (TN) | +91 80082 99901 (AP)

SUDHIER KUMAR GUPTHA

unread,
Oct 27, 2014, 12:59:23 AM10/27/14
to CSMysore, Jayashree Chandrasekaran
Form MGT 14 is not an STP form for all the issues,  Pls read the circular in this regard carefully.

Vivek Hegde

unread,
Oct 27, 2014, 1:04:29 AM10/27/14
to csmy...@googlegroups.com, Jayashree Chandrasekaran
Dear Mr.Anil/Mr.Sudhir,

I agree. Attaching the relevant circular. As per the circular, alteration of AOA is under STP.

Warm Regards

CS Vivek Hegde,B.com, FCS, CWA

Vivek Hegde & Co.
Company Secretaries
No. 2034, 26th Cross, K.R.Road
Banashankari II Stage, Behind 
Sevakshetra Hospital
Bangalore-560070
Mob : 09900898223
Off: 080 26710667

General_Circular_28_2014.pdf

BINDU MADHAVA

unread,
Oct 27, 2014, 2:50:02 AM10/27/14
to csmy...@googlegroups.com
But ROC has the suo moto powers over STP forms under 2nd proviso to Rule 10 of Registration offices and fees rules 2014
Regards
Bindu Madhava K G

sushant panchal

unread,
Oct 27, 2014, 2:58:08 AM10/27/14
to csmy...@googlegroups.com
Which ROC rejected the form?


Regards,
Sushant
Thanks & Regards,
Sushant Panchal

SUDHIER KUMAR GUPTHA

unread,
Oct 27, 2014, 8:40:09 AM10/27/14
to CSMysore
When the company's name gets changed, obviously we are supposed to change in the AOA also, probably that reservation by the MCA might have triggered  verification of  ROC.

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:19 PM, BINDU MADHAVA <binduma...@gmail.com> wrote:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages