"who is not related to promoters or directors in
the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company"
Whether word related is limited to only relatives as defined under section 2(77)??
Please confirm.
Deepesh
--
--
************************************************
Mail your comments, feedback and suggestions on CSMysore to Moderator: datta...@gmail.com and Manager: vivekhe...@gmail.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CSMysore" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to csmysore+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
But he become related because of transaction being held between holding and subsidiary companies.
And what about the principles of independence??
Deepesh
On 01-Jun-2014 8:10 AM, "CS Shainshad Aduvanni" <csupt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ID does not have any material pecuniary relationship and only eligible for Sittings (some times commission)
>
> So they are not related party to any transaction.
>
> Regards
>
>
> On 29 May 2014 16:47, Deepesh Nayak <csdeepe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sir, kindly also confirm if a person is independent director in both the holding and subsidiary company whether he will be treated as related party ??? or that independent director will be treated as related for any contract shall be held between holding and subsidiary company??
>>
>> Thanking you,
>>
>> *CS Deepesh Kumar Nayak*
>> Company Secretary
>> *Mob. 097134-80215*
>> *csdeepe...@gmail.com*
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Deepesh Nayak <csdeepe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sir, i am still bit confuse that how an independent director can be held such position in same group, however after careful reading of definition of independent director and criteria of independence he is eligible but i think there is something hide and lapse and according to me there is some thing in the act which restricts for the same but i am unable to get it find.
>>>
>>> Please suggest further on the same.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Deepesh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanking you,
>>>
>>> *CS Deepesh Kumar Nayak*
>>> Company Secretary
>>> *Mob. 097134-80215*
>>> *csdeepe...@gmail.com*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Mohit Mahana <csmaha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> CS Mohit Mahana
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Deepesh Nayak <csdeepe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mohit Sir,
>>>>>
>>>>> So can we appoint him as ID at the same time in both the companies??
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanking you,
>>>>>
Actually, apart from getting director sitting fees, the Holding and Subsidiary Companies have some contractual relations and being business to each other. Holding Company also appointed its some directors on the board of subsidiary company who have been considering as related parties since inception.
For, sitting fees, its not comes under the pecuniary relationship because law excludes specifically.
According to me there is only criteria of contractual relationship between H and S which affect his independence, hence he should not consider as independent director for both the company.
Others views are welcome.
Deepesh