Dear Friends : Mohan and Simran
While reading Ramaiya Book on The Companies Act, I came across these case laws and these are for information.
CASE LAW: Brady v. Brady, 1988 BCLC 579 : (1988) 2 All ER 617 (HL)
Where the objects clause of a company enabled it to dispose of its assets for such consideration as it thought fit, this was held to authorise a transfer in consideration of the promise of the transferee or a third party to pay to the company the value of assets transferred and the transaction was, therefore, not
ultra vires the company. Furthermore, the Court said that it made no difference that the promise was provided by a parent or associated company or that the parent or associated company's only assets were shares in the company. The proposed transaction was also not a misfeasance on the part of the directors or fraud on the creditors of the company because the transaction was carried out not only with the knowledge and assent of all the shareholders but with their active co-operation and at their instigation, the company being also solvent with a considerable surplus of assets over liabilities.
CASE LAW: Joint Receivers and Managers of Niltan Carson Ltd. v. Hawthorne, (1988) BCLC 298 (QBD)
Where the managing director of a company acting on its behalf granted a lease of the hotel premises to another director without the necessary approval of the shareholders, it was held that the person challenging the validity of the transaction would have to show that proper value was not taken, which was not done. Furthermore, the Court noted that the purchasing director had acted throughout with complete honesty and
openness and with the agreement of the managing director and practically all of the shareholders that she should run the community home independently of the company. The transaction was not voidable at the instance of the company.