First Board Meeting of the year within 120 days

125 views
Skip to first unread message

CS Alpesh Dhandhlya

unread,
Jun 30, 2014, 1:23:20 AM6/30/14
to csmy...@googlegroups.com

Dear Experts,

Section 173 of the CA, 2013 provides that; 

Every company shall hold the first meeting of the Board of Directors within thirty days of the date of its incorporation and thereafter hold a minimum number of four meetings of its Board of Directors every year in such a manner that not more than one hundred and twenty days shall intervene between two consecutive meetings of the Board.

Hence, can we hold the first Board meeting of the year within 120 days from the date of 1st April ? OR

Whether it is mandatory to hold the first Board meeting within the first quarter only ?

Deepesh Nayak

unread,
Jun 30, 2014, 1:28:13 AM6/30/14
to csmy...@googlegroups.com
Dear Alpesh Ji,

According to the language of section 173, there is no need to hold board meeting in  each and every quarter.  In earlier section, this requirement was clearly mentioned but in new act the only requirement is not more than 120 days between two BM and at least 4 board meetings in a year.

Now, what is the meaning of year is again debatable.

other views are solicited.

CS Deepesh Nayak



Thanking you,

*CS Deepesh Kumar Nayak*
 Company Secretary
 *Mob. 097134-80215*
*csdeepe...@gmail.com*




--
--
************************************************
Mail your comments, feedback and suggestions on CSMysore to Moderator: datta...@gmail.com and Manager: vivekhe...@gmail.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CSMysore" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to csmysore+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

CS Alpesh Dhandhlya

unread,
Jun 30, 2014, 3:29:23 AM6/30/14
to csmy...@googlegroups.com
Dear Deepesh Ji,

Thank you so much for guiding

In sub Section (5) of Section 173 of the CA, 2013 i.e. relating to the OPC, it is written as a Calender year. Further that under CA, 1956 the minutes were also drafted in accordance with the calender year.

Further that, Section 2 (41) define the Financial year and no where the year has been defined. Here the word used is year and not a financial year.

So can we draw conclusion that it may be calender wise ?

Deepesh Nayak

unread,
Jun 30, 2014, 6:33:07 AM6/30/14
to csmy...@googlegroups.com
Yes, it may be calender year. But, why calender year for 4 board meetings and why not financial year?? any logic??



Thanking you,

*CS Deepesh Kumar Nayak*
 Company Secretary
 *Mob. 097134-80215*
*csdeepe...@gmail.com*




--

sid

unread,
Jun 30, 2014, 7:00:19 AM6/30/14
to csmy...@googlegroups.com
As per the general clauses act year means "as per british calendar year" which is calendar year from 1st January to 31st December.

Thanks

CS Alpesh Dhandhlya

unread,
Jun 30, 2014, 7:02:06 AM6/30/14
to csmy...@googlegroups.com

I am also not able to grasp the logic behind keeping the calender year only for Board Meetings and for others all transaction it is a Financial year ?

csyogan .

unread,
Jun 30, 2014, 10:12:25 AM6/30/14
to csmysore
i think secretarial standards is clarifying this..
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages