indlaw.com
The Definitive Guide to Indian Law |
|
19/Oct/2009
In this newsletter, we summarize the important legal, tax and regulatory developments of the past week. We hope that this capsule of judgments from the higher judiciary and tribunals, legislations, rules, notifications and essays are appropriate for your research and information needs. We look forward to your feedback at con...@indlaw.com.
| |
CONTENTS OF THIS NEWSLETTER
|
|
|
LEGAL HEADLINES
HIGH COURTS,TRIBUNALS AND OTHER FORA JUDGMENTS
| High Courts |
Narender @ Sonu and Others vs State (Nct of Delhi) [DELHI HIGH COURT, 15 Oct 2009 ]
Criminal - Indian Penal Code, 1860, ss. 34 and 302 - Murder - Common intention - Conviction - Challenged - Appellants convicted u/s. 302 IPC - Present appeal - Held, no evidence on record to fix identity of person who actually inflicted knife injuries to deceased - No evidence to establish common i More... |
Veena vs State of Delhi [DELHI HIGH COURT, 15 Oct 2009 ]
Criminal - Indian Penal Code, 1860, s. 302 - Murder - Conviction - Challenged - Appellant allegedly murder her husband - (A) Whether conviction sustainable? - Held, testimony of eye witness PW1 support case of prosecution in material particulars and his version also corroborated with other witnesse More... |
Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Registrar vs (1) Vitthal Sakharam Kadam; (2) Learned Member of [BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 07 Oct 2009 ]
Labour & Industrial Law - Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Unfair labour practice - Denial of right of permanency to complainant-employee - Complaint filed - Industrial Court came to conclusion revised qualification for post of A.V. More... |
N.D.M.C vs Manju Maini [DELHI HIGH COURT, 06 Oct 2009 ]
Arbitration & ADR - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, s. 34 - Arbitral award - Challenged - Respondent was allotted parking sites at monthly license fee - Since respondent failed to pay license fee, notice was issued - Respondent still did not pay license fee - Licenses revoked - Arbitrat More... |
Sunil Kapoor and Another vs State and Another [DELHI HIGH COURT, 06 Oct 2009 ]
Criminal - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, s.482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860, s.406 - Cheating - Criminal proceedings - Quashing of - Allegation of non-refund of earnest money in an agreement to sell - De facto complainant filed criminal complaint against petitioners vendor - Dismissal of complaint More... |
Alfa Therm Limited vs Canara Bank and Another [DELHI HIGH COURT, 06 Oct 2009 ]
(A) Practice & Procedure - Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Jurisdiction of HC - Maintainability of suit - Non-filing of bid document containing territorial jurisdictional clause by plaintiff - However, 2nd defendant filed copy of original bid document having territorial jurisdic More... |
Sunayana Malhotra and Others vs ICICI Bank [DELHI HIGH COURT, 06 Oct 2009 ]
Civil Procedure - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, O. 7, r. 11 - Recovery of Debts Due to Banks & Financial Institutions Act, 1993, s. 18 - Securitization & Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, s. 34 - Rejection of plaint - Suit filed for declarat More... |
Anang Pal vs Union of India and Others [DELHI HIGH COURT, 06 Oct 2009 ]
Civil Procedure - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, s.91 r/w O.1 r.8 - Specific Relief Act, 1963, s.41(h) - Public land - Illegal Construction - Suit for declaration filed by 2 plaintiffs - Application for withdrawing suit filed by one plaintiff - Application allowed by Trial Court - However, another More... |
Prodip Kumar Mondal vs Union of India and Another [DELHI HIGH COURT, 06 Oct 2009 ]
Service - Examination Rules, r. 8 - Petitioner, a Scheduled Caste (SC) candidate, appeared in Section Officer Grade Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE) - Whether petitioner's claim that SC candidates, who secured marks equivalent to general standards, at par with unreserved candidat More... |
Jitender vs State [DELHI HIGH COURT, 06 Oct 2009 ]
Criminal - Indian Penal Code, 1860, ss. 324, 343, 376 and 376(2)(f) - Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, s. 23 - Rape - Conviction - Challenged - Appellant (step-father of prosecutrix) convicted u/ss. 376/324/343 IPC and s. 23 of Juvenile Justice Act - Prosecutrix, minor girl of 5 to 6 - Prosecutrix was c More... |
|
|
| Tribunals and other Fora |
(1) B. Radhakrishnan Pillai, Passenger Guard (Adhoc), Southern Railway, Palakkad; (2) R. Krishnanakumar, Passenger Guard (Adhoc), Southern Railway, Palakkad; (3) S. Afsar Ahamed, Passenger Guard (Adhoc), Southern Railway, Palakkad; (4) M. Murali, Passenger Guard (Adhoc), Southern Railway, Palakkad; (5) K. Chandran, Passenger Guard (Adhoc), Southern Railway, Palakkad; (6) N. Ganesan, Passenger Guard (Adhoc), Southern Railway, Palakkad; (7) R. Prasad, Passenger Guard (Adhoc), Southern Railway, Palakkad vs (1) Union of India, Secretary, Ministry of Railways, New Delhi; (2) General Manager, Southern Railway, Madras; (3) Chief Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Madras; (4) Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Palghat; (5) Railway Board, Secretary, New Delhi [CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, 07 Oct 2009 ]
Service - Ad-hoc promotion - Discontinuation - Challenged - Applicants challenging order by which ad-hoc promotions given to them as Passenger Guards was discontinued - Whether said order arbitrary and discriminatory? - Palghat Division filled up on ad-hoc basis for 3 months, as approved by Souther More... |
T. P. Baby, Carriage and Wagon Khalasi, Southern Railway, Alappuzha vs (1) Union of India, General Manager, Chennai; (2) Additional Divisional Railway Manager, Trivandrum; (3) Senior Divisional Mechanical Engineer, Trivandrum; (4) Divisional Personnel Officer, Trivandrum; (5) Senior Section Engineer Carriage and Wagon, Alappuzha [CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, 07 Oct 2009 ]
Service - Unauthorized absence - Removal from service - Departmental appeal of petitioner delinquent allowed - Order of removal from service set aside, however, reinstatement not permitted - Whether non-feasance from the part of respondents to reinstate petitioner, is arbitrary and illegal - After More... |
(1) Ponnamma Joseph; (2) P. T. Jose vs (1) Union of India, Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Railways, New Delhi; (2) General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai; (3) Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Trivandrum; (4) Chief Medical Officer, Southern Railway, Chennai [CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, 07 Oct 2009 ]
Service - Pension Rules - Constitution of India, 1950, arts. 14 and 16 - Pensionary benefits - Applicants joined Railway Service as Casual Labourer and was awarded temporary status followed by regular absorption - Superannuated - Whether prescription of qualifying service of 20 years, for inclusion More... |
(1) S. Thilakan; (2) M. Murali Madhavan; (3) P. Mohanan vs (1) Union of India, General Manager, Chennai; (2) Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Palakkad; (3) C. James John, Loco Pilot (Goods), Erode; (4) N. K. Vinod Kumar, Loco Pilot (Goods), Erode; (5) Sivakumar C., Loco Pilot (Goods), Erode; (6) M. S. Asokan, Loco Pilot (Goods), Erode; (7) K. R. Sarath Kumar, Loco Pilot (Goods), Erode; (8) K. Zainudheen, Loco Pilot (Goods), Erode; (9) V. T. Sivadasan, Loco Pilot (Goods), Erode; (10) K. K. Kandamuthan, Loco Pilot (Goods), Erode; (11) P. S. Gopalakrishnan, Loco Pilot (Goods), Erode; (12) K. G. Vasantha Kumar, Loco Pilot (Goods), Erode; (13) Radhakrishnan Nair V., Loco Pilot (Goods), Erode; (14) P. Unnikrishnan, Loco Pilot (Goods), Erode [CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, 06 Oct 2009 ]
Service - Seniority - Promotion - Assistant Loco Pilots (ALP) - Bifurcation of railway division into Palakkad division and Salem division - Transfer of ALPs from Salem division to Palakkad division on the ratio of 1:1 - Depletion of promotional prospects of ALPs in Palakkad division - Non-considera More... |
C. G. Ramadas, Foreman (AS), Staff Instructor Air Engineering Faculty, Naval Institute of Aeronautical Technology, Kochi vs (1) Union of India, Secretary, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi; (2) Chief of Naval Staff, Integrated Headquarters of Ministry of Defense, New Delhi; (3) Flag Officer Commanding Chief, Kochi; (4) Chief Staff Officer (P&A), Kochi; (5) P. Sreedharan Pillai, Foreman, Naval Institute of Aeronautical Technology, Kochi; (6) K. T. Gireesan, Foreman, Naval Air Craft Yard, Kochi [CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, 01 Oct 2009 ]
Service - Promotion - Entitlement to - Applicant on completing 3 years service as foreman was eligible to be promoted as Senior Foreman w.e.f 1.1.2003 - Meanwhile, Govt. of India on recommendation of 5th Pay Commission introduced 4 tier structure (4TS) - Applicant promoted as Assistant Foreman (AFM More... |
R. Somasekharan Nair vs (1) Director of Postal Services, Kochi; (2) Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Kottayam; (3) Sajeevan B (Inquiring Authority), Inspector of Posts, Kottayam; (4) Union of India, Secretary, Ministry of Communications, New Delhi [CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, 30 Sep 2009 ]
Service - Removal from service - Misappropriation of Postal Money Orders - Domestic Enquiry - Enquiry Officer found only 1 charge proved out of 3 charges framed - Disciplinary Authority found all charges proved against delinquent applicant - Imposition of punishment of removal from service - Appell More... |
P. Prabha, Superintendent of Police (Non-IPS), Vigilance Officer (Excise), Thruvanathapuram vs (1) State of Kerala, Chief Secretary, Thiruvananthapuram; (2) Union of India, Secretary, New Delhi; (3) Union Public Service Commission, Secretary, New Delhi; (4) Selection Committee For Selection, Chairman, Union Public Service Commission, New Delhi; (5) C. Rajagopal, Assistant Inspector General of Police (Public Grievances); (6) S. Jogesh, Superintendent of Police, Thiruvananthapuram; (7) George Varghese, Superintendent of Police (Retired) [CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, 30 Sep 2009 ]
Service - IPS (Appointment by Promotions) Rules 1955 - Promotion - Kerala State Service Police Officers - Applicant, Sub Inspector in Kerala State Police Department - Applicant not included in select list for year 2006 - Aggrieved by selection of respondents No.5 to 7, who are seniors, applicant fi More... |
E. Velappan, Divisional Forest Officer, Deputy Conservator of Forest (Non Cadre), Thiruvananthapuram vs (1) Union of India, Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forest, New Delhi; (2) State of Kerala, Chief Secretary, Thiruvananthapuram; (3) Union Public Service Commission, Secretary, New Delhi; (4) Selection Committee For Selection To The Indian Forest Service Constituted, Chairman, Union Public Service Commission, New Delhi; (5) A. K. Salim, Deputy Conservator of Forest (Non Cadre) (Retired), Thiruvananthapuram; (6) N. Sethukumar, Deputy Conservator of Forest (Non Cadre), Special Investigation and Protection Unit, Kottayam; (7) L. Krishna Prasad, Deputy Conservator of Forest (Non Cadre) (Retired), Thiruvananthapuram; (8) M. L. Thomas, Divisional Forest Officer, Idukki; (9) S. Sivadas, Deputy Conservator of Forest (Non Cadre) Junior (Retired), Alappuzha; (10) Joseph Thomas, Deputy Conservator of Forest (Non Cadre), Office of The Chief Conservator of Forest (Vigilance), Thiruvananthapuram; (11) A. R. Sasikumar, Divisional Forest Officer, Palakkad [CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, 24 Sep 2009 ]
Service - Indian Forest Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulation 1966, r. 5(3) - Promotion - Whether applicant can be considered for selection and appointment to IFS Cadre (Kerala)? - Applicant's name was included in zone of consideration for year 2006 - However, he could not be included in Se More... |
A. C. Mathew, Deputy Collector (Rr), Kannur vs (1) Union of India, Secretary, Ministry of Personnel and Training, New Delhi; (2) State of Kerala, Chief Secretary To Government, Thiruvananthapuram; (3) Selection Committee To Indian Administrative Service, Secretary, Union Public Service Commission, New Delhi; (4) Principal, Secretary To Government of Kerala, General Administration Department, Thiruvananthapuram [CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, 24 Sep 2009 ]
Service - All India Services Act, 1951 - Indian Administrative Service (Cadre) Rules, 1954 - Indian Administrative Service (IAS) - Quinquennial cadre review - Selection and appointment in IAS State cadre - Appointment from substantive posts of State Civil Service - Non-selection of applicant to IAS More... |
Santha T vs (1) Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Thiruvananthapuram; (2) Union of India, General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai; (3) Omana C.; (4) Baby [CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, 22 Sep 2009 ]
Service - Claim for disbursement of terminal benefits and compassionate appointment filed by applicant - Applicant claimed to be wife of deceased-employee who died in harness - Respondents contended third respondent is the wife of the said individual - Held, taking into account the documents filed More... |
|
| |
:. EDITOR'S PICK
There are several grey areas in the law relating to the use of force in dispersing an unlawful assembly as contained in Chapter X of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This places the police in a highly precarious situation. The law as it stands interpreted today makes absolutely unrealistic expectations from the officers in the field. Should they happen to use less force, they would be accused of dereliction of duty should they use lethal force, they could be accused of murder. Their judgment, in so far as the type and quantum of force used is concerned, is expected to be one hundred percent perfect. The law does not provide for eventualities like a magistrate refusing to give an order in writing or backing out from a verbal order given. Quite often the deployments are so extended that sub-inspectors or magistrates are not available to issue orders. Hence if small detachments are attacked
|
Whether plea bargaining is an effective method of delivering justice has been a hot burning topic which needs to be handled with proper care and caution. In the modern field of criminal jurisprudence, which is still in its infant stage, it is very well needs to be answered as to how is it going to act as a tool for providing justice?
|
|
| |
:. ARTICLES
With the world economy being on a low and menace of recession hitting the global village, certain very pertinent issues pertaining to large scale lay-offs and retrenchments have surfaced yet again. A number of foreign business houses may close their shops in the global market which would result in a large efflux of employees employed in these units. India being no exception to the global forces and also being one of the most participating global economy may be hit hard with a number of Indian employees having thrown out of employment due to the retrenchments and closure of the foreign business units in India. In the light of the prevailing circumstances, section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (IDA) surfaces to provide some security and relief to the workers.
|
The researcher has tried to find out in this article that What is Business Method? Whether the Business Method “ Per Se ” is a patentable subject matter in US & EU or Not? What is the legal situation concerning the patentability of Business Methods in US & Europe? What is technical effect & what in fact “technical effect” consists of?
|
|
| |
| :. POLICY WATCH
|
IMPORTANT SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS
Baswant Shankarappa Swami vs State of Maharashtra and Others [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 09 Oct 2009 ]
Service - Irrigation Department (Recruitment Rules), 1996, s.3 - Promotion - No experience in one or more branches of engineering as provided in r.3 - Appellant denied promotion to Superintending Engineer (Civil) - Application filed by appellant before Tribunal - Application dismissed - Writ petiti More... |
Sohan Singh and Another vs State of Bihar [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 09 Oct 2009 ]
Criminal - Indian Penal Code, 1860, s.376 - Rape - Conviction - Appellants allegedly raped PW3 - Conviction by Trial Court - Conviction confirmed by HC - Whether conviction sustainable - Held, PW1, PW2 and PW3 deposed similarly with regard to the manner in which the offence was committed by appella More... |
Sebastian @ Chevithiyan vs State of Kerala [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 09 Oct 2009 ]
Criminal - Indian Penal Code, 1860, ss.302, 376 - Rape and Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Appellant allegedly raped and murdered 2 year old child - Conviction - Trial Court awarded death sentence - HC upheld conviction and death sentence - Whether conviction sustainable - Held, presence of appe More... |
Babu Ram and Another vs State of Haryana and Another [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 07 Oct 2009 ]
Land & Property - Land Acquisition Act, 1894, ss. 4, 5-A, 6, 17(2)(c), 17(4) - Land Acquisition Proceedings - Right of citizen to file objections u/s. 5-A - Construction of Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) - Notification issued for acquisition of certain lands u/s. 4 r/w s. 17(2)(c) of Act for cons More... |
Arulvelu and Another vs State, By The Public Prosecutor and Another [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 07 Oct 2009 ]
Criminal - Indian Penal Code, 1860, ss. 304-B and 498-A - Scope of interference of HC - Order of acquittal - HC reversed judgment of acquittal passed by Trial Court and convicted accused persons - Present appeal against conviction - Whether HC was justified in reversing order of acquittal passed by More... |
Tirupur Dyeing Factory Owners Association vs Noyyal River Ayacutdars Protection Association and Others [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 06 Oct 2009 ]
Environment, Wildlife & Animal - Public Interest Litigation (PIL) - Industrial effluents - Discharge by dyeing and bleaching industries - Pollution of river and its allied dam - PIL filed before HC - Interim direction issued by HC to appellant association of industries to achieve Zero Liquid Di More... |
Arun Kumar Sharma vs State of Bihar [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 05 Oct 2009 ]
Criminal - Indian Penal Code, 1860, ss. 34, 302, 304B and 498A - Murder - Conviction - Challenged - Appellant convicted u/s. 302 - Conviction confirmed by HC - Hence, present appeal - Appellant allegedly murdered his wife by strangulating her neck - Whether prosecution proved offence beyond reasona More... |
Suraj Ghising Lama vs State of Arunachal Pradesh and Another [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 01 Oct 2009 ]
Practice & Procedure - Transfer Petition - Criminal case against appellant - 2nd respondent, the de facto complainant, is a Session Judge - Case pending before another Sessions Judge - Transfer sought on ground that only 3 Sessions Judges available in State, therefore, appellant likely to be de More... |
Rainbow Rubber Industries and Others vs Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Madurai [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 01 Oct 2009 ]
Excise - Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944, s. 9 - Conviction - Trial court found appellants guilty of evading excise duty and sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs.1, 000/- each and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one More... |
Divya Darshana vs Goma Ram and Others [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 29 Sep 2009 ]
Mines & Minerals - Mining lease licence - Cancellation of - Petition filed before HC alleging that petitioner has been doing illegal mining activity and thereby causing extensive damage to water flow and environment in that area - HC ordered cancellation of license granted to petitioner - Wheth More... |
Munna Lal vs Union of India and Others [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 29 Sep 2009 ]
Service - Misconduct - Termination - Challenged - Disciplinary proceedings initiated against appellant alleging that he drunk while on duty - Service terminated - Whether imposing penalty of termination on appellant justified? - It was not proved that appellant was drunk on day when he was on duty More... |
State of Uttar Pradesh and Others vs Sandeep Kumar Balmiki and Others [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 18 Sep 2009 ]
Service - Interim order - Legality - Writ application filed by respondents challenging orders of termination of their service - By interim order, Single Judge stayed order of termination - DB affirmed interim order - Hence, present appeal - Held, interim order could not be passed at this stage in v More... |
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited vs Sunil Bansal and Others [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 18 Sep 2009 ]
Carriers & Transportation - Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, r.90(7) and 115(14) - Pursuant to directions of SC in case of M.C. Mehta v. Union of India & Others 1998 INDLAW SC 1078, Central Govt. issued various notifications to achieve object of reducing pollution in NCR - Appellant (Bha More... |
Branch Manager, Magma Leasing and Finance Limited and Another vs Potluri Madhavilata and Another [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 18 Sep 2009 ]
(A) Arbitration & ADR - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, s.8 - Alternative Dispute Resolution - Reference of dispute to arbitrator - Once pre-requisite conditions of s.8 satisfied the court must refer parties to arbitration.
(B) Contract & Commercial - Hire purchase agreement - A More... |
Laxmidas Morarji (Dead ) By Lrs vs Behrose Darab Madan [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 18 Sep 2009 ]
(A) Practice & Procedure - Constitution of India, 1950, art.142 - Enforcement of decrees and orders - Power of SC - SC cannot pass an order or grant relief u/art.142, which is totally inconsistent or goes against substantive or statutory enactments - However, power is to be used sparingly in ca More... |
Ram Sukh vs Dinesh Aggarwal [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 18 Sep 2009 ]
Election - Representation of People Act, 1951, ss. 80, 83(1)(a), 86, 87, 100(1)(b) and 100(1)(d) 100(1)(d)(iv) and 116A - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, O. VI, rr. 16 and 17 and O. VII, r. 11 - Election petition - Maintainability - Non-disclosure of material facts - Election to State Legislative As More... |
Jagdish vs State of Madhya Pradesh [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 18 Sep 2009 ]
Criminal - Indian Penal Code, 1860, s.302 - Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Conviction - Appellant allegedly hacked his wife and children to death - Appellant convicted and sentenced to death by Trial Court - Conviction and death reference maintained by HC - Legality - Contention by appellant th More... |
Raj Narain Singh vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Others [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 18 Sep 2009 ]
(A) Practice & Procedure - Constitution of India, 1950, art.136 - Appeal by Special Leave - Scope - Scope of art.136 is limited - SC does not exercise its overriding powers u/art.136 to reweigh evidence - SC does not disturb concurrent findings of facts reached upon by Trial Court after proper More... |
Ashok Singh vs State of Uttar Pradesh [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 18 Sep 2009 ]
Criminal - Indian Penal Code, 1860, s. 302 - Murder - Conviction - Appellants allegedly shot deceased to death - Appellants convicted by Trial Court - Conviction upheld by HC - Legality - Held, evidence of PW3 eye witness corroborated by PW4 independent witness - Defence by appellant that PW4 indeb More... |
Bibi Zafira Khatoon and Others vs Mohammed Hussain and Another [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 17 Sep 2009 ]
Rent Control - Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982, ss.2(h) and 12 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, ss.47 and 151 - Decree of eviction - Execution - Appellant No.1 and her husband filed suit for eviction of respondent No.2 - In suit, respondent pleaded that sale agreement ex More... |
|
| |
|
| NOTIFICATIONS, CIRCULARS & TRADE NOTICES
|
IDMD/1655 /08.02.33/2009-10 (09 Oct 2009) (Circular)
Auction of Government of India Dated Securities |
4 (1)-W&M/2009 (09 Oct 2009) (Notification)
Auction for Sale of a New Government Stock of 5 Years |
4 (1)-W&M/2009(ii) (09 Oct 2009) (Notification)
Auction for Sale (Re-issue ) of ‘7.35 per cent Government Stock, 2024' |
4 (1)-W&M/2009(i) (09 Oct 2009) (Notification)
Auction for Sale (Re-issue ) of ‘6.35 per cent Government Stock, 2020' |
MRD/DSA/SE/Cir-12/09 (07 Oct 2009) (Circular)
Prior approval for re-commencing trading on the Stock Exchange |
RPCD.CO RRB.No. 29 /03.05.33/2009-10 (06 Oct 2009) (Circular)
RRBs - Priority Sector Lending - Categorisation of activities under service under the MSMED Act, 2006 |
900 /20/2009-CX (06 Oct 2009) (Circular)
Permission to bring duty-paid packing materials into export warehouse under Rule 20 of Central Excise Rules - reg |
UBD.CO.BPD. (PCB). Cir. No. 14/12.05.001/2009-10 (06 Oct 2009) (Circular)
Review of bilateral clearing arrangements between banks - Urban Co-operative Banks |
FMD/MSRG/40 /01.14.001/2009-2010 (05 Oct 2009) (Circular)
Reporting of OTC Interest Rate Derivatives - Client Level Transactions |
A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No.11 (05 Oct 2009) (Circular)
Issue of Bank Guarantee on behalf of service importers | |
| LEGISLATIONS & RULES
|
| Prohibition of Smoking in Public Places (Amendment) Rules, 2009 |
| Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 2009 |
| CENVAT Credit (Second Amendment) Rules, 2009 |
| Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2009 |
| Income-tax (Twelfth Amendment) Rules, 2009 |
| Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Second Amendments Rules, 2009 |
| Beedi Workers Welfare Fund (Amendment) Rules, 2009 |
| Competition Commission of India (Salary, Allowances and other Terms and Conditions of Service of Chairperson and other Members) Second Amendment Rules, 2009 |
| Central Health Service (Amendment) Rules, 2009 |
| Environment (Protection) Fifth Amendment Rules, 2009 |
indlaw MODULES
Subscribe to indlaw.com
| |
| NEW DELHI |
CHENNAI |
BANGALORE |
MUMBAI |
KOLKATTA |
COCHIN |
Pradeep Bhojwal
D-77, IInd Floor, Defence Colony, New Delhi - 24
Tel: 011 46688777, 41553359, 24336836
Mob: 91 9811507686
Fax: 011 46688770
mark...@Indlaw.com |
Ranjith Robert
C.Sitaraman & Co.
No: 37/1, Royapettah High Road, Royapettah, Chennai - 600014.
Tel: 044 28111516, 28117069, 28112990, Mob: 91 9841392822
ran...@indlaw.com |
Viswesh Sekhar
# 14/33/1, 37th Cross, Main Road, 8th Block
Jayanagar, Bangalore -70
Mob: 91 9886033399
bang...@indlaw.com
|
Kamal Gadodia
201 Gold Crown,
J P. Road, 7 Bungalows,
Andheri (W), Mumbai-61
Mob: 91 9821418553 gad...@indlaw.com
|
Kalyan K. Banerjee
A-1, Satyen Park, M.Gandhi Road, Crossing James Long Avenue,
P.S. Thakurpukur, P.O. Joka, Kolkata - 04
Mob: 91 9831338080
kal...@indlaw.com
|
Dominic Johnson
Law Book Shop
1st Floor, Oriental Complex, Banerji Road,
Market Road Jn., Ernakulam, Cochin - 18
Tel: 0484 2397895, 2398484
Mob: 91 9447768991
lawbo...@vsnl.net
|
| INDLAW DATABASES |
|
Case Laws
Search from over 2,00,000 full text Judgments of Indian and English Courts
Legislations & Rules
Over 8,000 Legislations and Rules includes Imperial, Dominion and Parliamentary statutes, treaties, conventions and double tax avoidance agreements.
Notifications,Trade Notices & Circulars
Over 40,000 Notifications, Trade Notices and Circulars searchable on the basis of over 5000 industry and product categories, jurisdiction and laws.
Practice Directions & FAQs
Practice directions and FAQs on company secretarial compliances, application and petition formats, draft agreements, court filing directions, document templates, forms and procedures.
|
Forms
Tax, business and commercial Legal Forms. Available in Downloadable and Printable format.
Reports
Reports of expert committees, important policy speeches, law commission reports, company & financial information and government reports.
Indlaw Articles
Section focuses on academic studies and works on issues of contemporary legal relevance and law review articles |
|
|
|
| |
Subscribe Now
Click here to subscribe this newsletter
Customise Newsletter
Change/Edit your Newsletter Type
Unsubscribe
Click here to unsubscribe
| |
| |
