Sorry, I miscalculated. It uses 2.4 GB in double format, so it's a
good idea to use single format if you are going to keep all of the
filter responses in memory.
Also, you're right that it will be slow. A couple to speed it up:
(1) Downsample your filters by a factor of 2. This makes it go from
15 sec to 2-3 sec in my tests.
(2) Try running the MR8fast code from the same web site.
(3) Use a subset of the filter bank (maybe just 24 filters)
Thanks for bringing these issues to attention.
Derek