I noticed when checking a few of my rows, that the other row's values
for sizes seemed close to the values on the Stats panel in YSlow,
which shows the total value of files of that type, using the
compressed value where applicable. I thought we had to go to the
Components panel and add up the values, using the uncompressed when
the file was compressed, for HTML, JS, and CSS because we want the
uncompressed total size.
Is my understanding of the right way to do this correct? This may be
the cause of a lot of discrepancies in file sizes. Something for
people to look out for when double checking.
On Nov 9, 12:46 pm, "Jeff Pickhardt" <pickha...@gmail.com
> What about Flash? I know tribalfusion.com
uses Flash, and I included
> that in the total size. But there wasn't a column for Flash...
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Tse-Wen Tom Wang <tse...@gmail.com
> > They might not agree at all with YSlow's stats though, because YSlow's
> > stats report compressed sizes, while we are supposed to record
> > images and compresses the aforementioned file types, then the result
> > could vary widely.
> > Tom
> > On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Aravind Narayanan <a.cyber...@gmail.com
> >> They are set to automatically sum the previous size columns. I'm assuming
> >> that they will (roughly) agree with YSlow :)
> >> Thanks
> >> --
> >> Aravind Narayanan | a.cyber...@gmail.com
> >> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 09:29, Vibhor Nanavati <nvib...@gmail.com
> >>> Isn't the total-size column set to be the sum of those previous columns?
> >>> For me, I never cross verified that column with what YSlow reports.
> >>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Aravind Narayanan <a.cyber...@gmail.com
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> It should just be the sum of those components, as calculated in YSlow.
> >>>> Also the images column should contain the size of both CSS images and
> >>>> normal images.
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> --
> >>>> Aravind Narayanan | a.cyber...@gmail.com
> >>>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 09:26, Gustav Rydstedt <gustav.rydst...@gmail.com