Rijndael with 256 bits

[TimmyTurner]

Hi!

Could you schedule a Rijndael implementation with support for 256 bit
blocksizes for the next release? (Or does the library already provide
one and I missed it?)

Thanks

[Wei Dai]

It's not in Crypto++ yet. Do you need to have a fast implementation of
Rijndael with 256-bit blocksize? I was planning to do an implementation of
Rijndael that doesn't use large tables, and I can add support for larger
blocksizes as part of that. Doing a fast implementation would be a lot more
work.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "TimmyTurner" <timm...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 1:48 PM
To: "Crypto++ Users" <cryptop...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Rijndael with 256 bits

[TimmyTurner]

Well a fast one would of course be better, but I guess a "slow" one is
just as fine...

Would this affect the current fast implementation of Crypto++ ?

Thank you!

On 1 Mrz., 00:44, "Wei Dai" <wei...@weidai.com> wrote:
> It's not in Crypto++ yet. Do you need to have a fast implementation of
> Rijndael with 256-bit blocksize? I was planning to do an implementation of
> Rijndael that doesn't use large tables, and I can add support for larger
> blocksizes as part of that. Doing a fast implementation would be a lot more
> work.
>
> --------------------------------------------------

> From: "TimmyTurner" <timm.t...@gmail.com>