PKCS #1 v2.1 compliance

3 views
Skip to first unread message

B-Con

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 6:14:25 PM11/9/09
to Crypto++ Users
Is there a reason why the project's home page only lists Crypto++ as
being compliant with PKCS #1 for v2.0? PKCS #1 v2.1 has been out for
many years and I do not see anything in v2.1 missing from Crypto++.

Brad Conte

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 10:32:01 PM11/10/09
to nolo...@gmail.com, Crypto++ Users
Hi,

Thanks for the reply. I continued looking at the code after I sent the
e-mail and I didn't find anything about multi-prime RSA. It seems,
however, that RSASSA-PSS is included, which was introduced in v2.1. Is
RSASSA-PSS indeed included?

Thanks,

--Brad

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Jeffrey Walton <nolo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi B-Con,
>
> Crypto++ does not implement mulit-prime RSA (if I recall correctly).
>
> Jeff
>> [SNIP]
>

Jeffrey Walton

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 8:16:23 PM11/10/09
to B-Con, Crypto++ Users
Hi B-Con,

Crypto++ does not implement mulit-prime RSA (if I recall correctly).

Jeff

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:14 PM, B-Con <beaco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [SNIP]

Wei Dai

unread,
Nov 13, 2009, 7:51:21 PM11/13/09
to Brad Conte, nolo...@gmail.com, Crypto++ Users
Yes, RSASSA-PSS is supported.

Is there any demand for multi-prime RSA, BTW?

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Brad Conte" <br...@bradconte.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 7:32 PM
To: <nolo...@gmail.com>
Cc: "Crypto++ Users" <cryptop...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: PKCS #1 v2.1 compliance
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++
> Users" Google Group.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to
> cryptopp-user...@googlegroups.com.
> More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at
> http://www.cryptopp.com.
>
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages