Comment on revision r538 in crush-tools

10 views
Skip to first unread message

crush...@googlecode.com

unread,
Dec 6, 2014, 1:39:47 PM12/6/14
to crush...@googlegroups.com
Comment by jimrenw...@gmail.com:

Score: Positive

General Comment:
thanks!

For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/crush-tools/source/detail?r=538

crush...@googlecode.com

unread,
Dec 7, 2014, 10:25:43 AM12/7/14
to crush...@googlegroups.com
Comment by warlock.cc:

Score: Positive

General Comment:
Would you need to wrap that check in a loop to check that any of the next
files don't contain headers either?

crush...@googlecode.com

unread,
Dec 8, 2014, 1:07:19 PM12/8/14
to crush...@googlegroups.com
Comment by jeremy.h...@gmail.com:

General Comment:
@warlock.cc - Oddly the multiple input file scenario had never been tested
(or used?). So that's a separate bug, but you're right. See r539.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages