Version branches after repo merge

[Thomas Boerger]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

until today we always used name from flintstone characters, i would
suggest to stop that with the merge of the repositories and switch to
version numbers.

We have switched the version to 3.0 for the packages on SLES. So IMHO
it should be fine if we branch in the future to release/3.0,
release/3.1 release/3.2 and so on.

Any objections? Or do you really want to stay at this weird naming schem
e?


Regards,
Thomas Boerger

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=oz2E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Maximilian Meister]

On 07/20/2015 03:01 PM, Thomas Boerger wrote:
> Any objections? Or do you really want to stay at this weird naming schem
> e?
>
>

I personally have never liked the names, so if you ask me, then
Yabba-Dabba Do it!

--
--
Thanks,
Maximilian

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

[Adam Spiers]

Maximilian Meister <mmei...@suse.de> wrote:
> On 07/20/2015 03:01 PM, Thomas Boerger wrote:
> >Any objections? Or do you really want to stay at this weird naming scheme?
>
> I personally have never liked the names, so if you ask me, then
> Yabba-Dabba Do it!

+1 for ditching names and just using numbers.