--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Genome Engineering using CRISPR/Cas Systems" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to crispr+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
For large scale screening is it better to add virus based dilution OR transforming units?
I have done some titering in 12 well plates using A549 cells in 500ul media for 24hrs. The method I used was based on % alive cells after puromycin selection and then calculating how many cells were transduced when I added the virus, and then calculate the transducing unit I have in the concentrated virus stocks eg, if 25 % of cells survived with 0.1ul virus added to cells in 500ul growth media (1:5000), then 2500 out of 10000 cells (cells in wells when virus was added) were transduced, therefore I have 2500 transducing units in 0.1ul virus solution = 25,000 TU/ul.
If I take this to large T175 culture where I have 2.5 e+6 cells per flask (I need a lot of cells due to the numbers needed for the library where I will need 26 flasks for each Gecko library) and transduce in 10ml media. To get MOI of 0.3 in need 7.5e5 TU ( 2.5 e+6 x 0.3 =7.5e5 TU) , so from viral stock of 25,000 TU/ul I need 30ul virus. In 10ml media this will be 1 in 333.33 dilution (10,000ul/30ul), which is more concentrated than it was in the 12 well plate titer (roughly 1 :5000).
Should I use TU/ul =30ul or the second dilution method 1:5000 of 10mls that would be 2ul?
I'm planning a small scale single flask T175 optimisation with a control virus to find out. I've been told by a work colleague that I should use the TU/ul method.
Thanks