Iupgraded mono and cases from the hyte 40 and mid pro z790- p WiFi to the nxzt H9 Flow looks are stunning. Soon as I turn on the AI overclock feature I get a cooler score of 160 and tunes my ratios 2 cores 59 rest 57. It get hot tjmax soon as cinbench 23 starts I got the aio kraken 360 elite rgb 9 Asia horse cosmiq fans 3 kraken rgb 120 on my push side of pump. Any idea what can do bring temps down and keep my ratios? New to all so any help is much needed
After I've come across this, my CPU runs WAY COOLER, WAY LOWER VOLTAGES and same or better PERFORMANCE since it not being blasted by high voltages and overheating my CPU which now runs cooler never hitting the thermal limits.
Many MB Manufacturers are overvolting the CPU's causing them not to be stable, overheating, and hitting limits. Remember AMD's cpu exploding or bubbling up. They were overvolting them over the CPU specs to try to make them faster but it was damaging the CPU's. Same goes for intel's cpu.
There's nothing you can do anymore, because the AI overclocking means the CPU draws more power (PL1 and PL2 are probably at 4095 W, etc.) and then it gets really warm as soon as Cinebench is running.
It was the same for me and only a custom water cooling system can help, as an AiO 360 is already unable to cool it.
But it's also normal, because in Cinebench ALL cores are loaded to max., which rarely happens in "normal" everyday PC life.
My advice, leave out the AI overclocking, set "Asus Multicore Enhancement" to "disabled - Forced all Limits" in the UEFI (this forces the Intel specifications, including PL1 and PL2). Make sure there is enough fresh air in the housing. The fan is installed at the front and sucks in, the fan at the back blows out of the case, the AiO is installed at the top and the fan also blows out of the case.
If the AiO is installed in the front, then also mount the fans into the housing so that they suck.
There's nothing more you can do with an AiO.
When I first put this setup together it seemed to be working fine. I was still on my old windows install from my old hardware, I did driver cleanup and all of that and I was gaming hard for hours at a time. As of yesterday, basically all of my games are crashing with very vague error messages.
BF1 Crashes either at the menu, or as soon as I get in the game, with a variation of errors. Event ID 1000, Event ID 1001 Event Name BEX64. PUBG Crashes at the menu as well, with no discernable log anywhere it it's files or event viewer. CSGO Crashes as well within a minute of playing it, no log. The only game that seems to work is Metro Last light, which works totally fine??
I've tried most logical steps. First I did a completely fresh install of Windows 10, installed the latest AMD drivers (Adrenalin 23.1.1), I've tried the previous drivers as well with a DDU cleanup. I've tried windowed or full screen in these games. My card is not overheating or being overexerted, neither is my CPU. I tried turning off XMP as well. There are some parallels with this thread but that's the closest I've seen but nothing in there fixes my issue.
I'm at my wits end here guys, I'm hoping someone can offer some advice or point me in the right direction of some troubleshooting stuff. This card worked so well, I just don't get how suddenly there are all these issues.
I feel like an idiot but think I found the solution. I didn't realize that my Mobo was automatically overclocking my 13700KF quite a bit, with a Clock ratio in the 50's at 5400MHz. I took that down a bit to around 4500Mhz and had no issue launching and of the games and playing for extended period. Now to see why the frequency cant go so high
I had some very similar issues when I was running a system with an 11900k. Found out I had to disable Cstates for some reason. I realize it may seem like a stretch if you were running fine before the new GPU but at least it's something quick to try. I have also found the 7900XTX can act really strange depending on power supply so if you have an extra one or can use someones for testing that's another thing I would try just to rule it out.
Hi, thank you for the response. I tried disabling Cstates but it made no impact. Sadly I don't have another PSU to test with but this is a brand new Corsair RM1000x I got for this build.
This is incredibly frustrating because somehow this same setup was working fine 2 days ago
2. i discovered that i can change the phisical and logic ratio in the bios...i have a i7-13700kf so max overclock is 5.4 GHz...if one day i decide to change frequency i should set a 54 multiplier to get 5400 MHz. but what happens if for example i set 100000 Mhz ?
Please keep in mind that maximum frequency is automatic and dependent on working conditions. So, it will depend on the tasks or processes you run, if the workload demand is high and there are no physical constraints, then the processor may operate at or close to the Turbo frequency.
We're glad to know the information helped. Hopefully, it will help other community members. Since the thread is now solved, we will close it. If you need any additional information, please submit a new question as this thread will no longer be monitored.
Intel does not verify all solutions, including but not limited to any file transfers that may appear in this community. Accordingly, Intel disclaims all express and implied warranties, including without limitation, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement, as well as any warranty arising from course of performance, course of dealing, or usage in trade.
The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K vs Intel Core i7-13700K showdown is a matchup of one upper mid-range processor against two nimble and competent competitors for the title of the best CPU for gaming.
The $448 Ryzen 7 7800X3D is now the fastest gaming CPU in the world. The 7800X3D recently debuted to critical acclaim, arriving with eight cores and 16 threads and AMD's Second-Gen 3D V-Cache that deliver ever-so-slightly more gaming performance than the flagship $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D. The 3D V-Cache tech fuses a 3D-stacked cache chiplet atop the processor to deliver market-leading gaming performance at the expense of performance in productivity applications, but while it delivers explosive uplift in some games, not all titles benefit.
In contrast, the $570 Core i9-13900K wields 24 cores and 32 threads with Intel's 13th-Gen Raptor Lake x86 hybrid architecture. The Intel Core i9-13900K is Intel's fastest gaming processor, and while it isn't quite as fast as AMD's X3D chips in gaming, it serves up a more predictable blend of performance in both gaming and productivity apps.
Intel also has its Core i7-13700K, which offers nearly the same level of performance as the 13900K in gaming, but at a much more amenable $417 price point that is more competitive with the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. While the 13700K isn't as fast in productivity work as the 13900K, it also offers far more performance than the 7800X3D in the types of apps.
This makes for a complex array of choices if you're looking for a flagship gaming experience with your next rig, and that's before we even factor in pricing. Below we've taken the Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Core i9-13900K vs Core i7-13700K rivalry through a six-round faceoff to see which chips take the crown in our gaming and application benchmarks, along with other key criteria like power consumption and pricing. Let's see how they stack up.
Remember, this article is an overview of our much more in-depth testing in our AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Review. Below is the geometric mean of our gaming tests with the Core i7-13700K vs AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K at 1080p and 1440p, with each resolution split into its own chart. As usual, we're testing with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 to reduce GPU-imposed bottlenecks as much as possible, but differences will shrink with lesser cards or higher resolutions.
We can boil down performance in productivity apps into two broad categories: single- and multi-threaded. The first slide above shows the geometric mean of performance in several of our most important tests in the single-threaded category, but be sure to look at the expanded results in the above album.
The Core i9-13900K beats the 7800X3D easily: it's 32% faster in single-threaded work, while the Core i7-13700K is 22% faster. Naturally, those performance deltas won't carry over to every type of workload. However, flipping through the album of test results reveals that the Intel processors excel in single-threaded work, thus providing more responsive performance than the 7800X3D in light applications.
As usual, performance gains from overclocking can boil down to your luck in the silicon lottery. As you can see above, overclocking with conventional cooling for both the Intel and AMD processors results in fairly minimal gains in applications. In fact, the 13900K actually suffers from lower performance in single-threaded work because its 5.6 GHz overclock is lower than its stock 5.8 GHz boost. The Core i9-13900K does gain 6% in gaming, a higher percentage gain than the 13700K and 7800X3D, but it still lags behind the 7800X3D's peak gaming performance.
This innovative blend strikes a pleasant chord between raw processing and energy preservation, ensuring peak performance across a spectrum of tasks. With the help of 24 threads, these processors produce seamless multitasking, effortlessly tackling complex workloads and demanding applications. The boosted clock speed of 5.40GHz unleashes a torrent of computational prowess, while the base clock speed of 3.40GHz lays a solid foundation for efficient operations.
3a8082e126