Windows 8 Lite 700mb
Cilinia Looker
In order to resolve this you might want to use "Disk Management" (see -management-windows-7.htm how to find it), delete existing partitions on your USB drive and create a new one, filling all the space.
It was written that with windows xp 32 bit the top 700 mb or ram or so was not usable. But it has also been said that there is no point installing more than 3gb or so. So this leads me to this issue. So is that area reserved by the os actually residing in that ram, or is just using the address space. In other words is the ram physically being filled with 700mb of information, or is 700mb of the cpu' address space being reserved and mapped. Because if it is not, then installing 3gbs would still be a problem, because it would still take away 700mb somehow?
32 bit systems have 4 GB of available address space, but address space is used fo rmore than just system memory. For example, part of video card memory can be mapped into the address space, which reduces the space available for system memory. This is covered in the section "How graphics cards and other devices affect memory limits" of Microsoft's Memory Limits for Windows page.
I want to install the lastest version of ubuntu (14.04) on my old windows PC but it only has a CD-ROM drive, and the BIOS is not letting me install from much else, so I want to find a ISO that is less than 700MB to fit on a CD-R. Is there one? The regular one that I downloaded is over 900MB.
Go over to the Lubuntu download site, download the correct version (i guess 32-bit), and burn it to an CD. Just follow the installation to install Lubuntu, and after you are in your new system, do the following steps to remove all of the Lubuntu specific software, and install the Ubuntu equivalents;
But because your system already is a bit older (i made this assumption based on the fact that it doesn't support USB booting), it may be better to keep Lubuntu, because it's more resource friendly. And the only difference between the two are the looks, Ubuntu uses Unity and Lubuntu uses LXDE, and the set of "base" software that comes with it such as the terminal, notepad, music player etc.
I understand SQL 2000 Standard on Windows 2003 Server Standard has a 2gb memory limit, however why wont the memory push up to this limit? The OS shows there is around 700mb of the 3076 unused (SQL uses 1660, windows uses around 700 making the maximum used around 2300 of the 3076)
I have set the /3gb switch on windows boot, I have changed the SQL memory configurations many different times. If I try and set 'min server memory' to anything over around 1500mb I get the error on SQL startup;
Your server has only 2GB of RAM. And adding the .3GB switch is of no use as it is to be used only when the server has more than 4Gb of RAM so that OS can use 1Gb and other 3GB will be allocated to other applications running in the server. As you have only 2GB and OS uses 700MB you have only 1300MB left in your server. Remember that OS shows free memory that also includes your virtual memory. SQL Server does not use virtual memory and depends fully on physical memory so if you want your sql to use more RAM add mor RAM to your server and use the /3GB switch so that SQL can use up to 3GB.
I recently upgraded my 2Gb SQL Server 2K SP4 installation from Windows 2K to Windows 2K3, and immediately noticed that the server does not use as much memory for SQL Server (nothing else major runs on the machine) as it did under Win 2K.
Currently SQL server is ticking along using 1.4Gb, and there is 128Mb free on the server. Under Windows 2K these figures were usually about 1.8Gb and 50-60Mb respectively. Presumably Win 2K3 manages memory slightly differently...
Are you running dynamic memory allocation for the database server? If so, perhaps the server just doesn't think that it needs any more. I wonder what you'd get if you were to manually set the memory settings in the server properties to 2gig.
I have a not dissimilar thing going on. We just upgraded one of my servers to 4gig. Each instance reports 4gig available. I assumed that since Standard is capped at 2gig that it would report 2gig available. I am not concerned with it because all of the instances on that box are ticking away quite merrily and I'll be upgrading it to SS2K Enterprise in the not distant future.
My model is bloating again. In the last month is has fairly steadily grown from 270mb to 660mb. I haven't added anything significant... Mostly just editing what's there. Something is obviously going wrong. Any ideas? Here's the audit3dm info: ...
Hi I have tried to reduce a file size and I have deleted all the elements that I didn't want and then purge the file however it would not reduce to a reasonable size (40M) for just a small 3D step model. I have then copied the 3d model and pasted it...
Hello, my file is unworkable right now, and shot up from around 100mb or less to 1,140 mb. Please help. I am using cad blocks and hatches. However, I am also using that in another file taking up much less space. When I did SelBadObjects, 2 come up, but even after deleting those, the file is still slow; I also need both of those bad objects. Any suggestions?
yes there are a lot of materials and cad blocks. I am not sure what textures are. I have saved small and the size has decreased to around 700mb. It is better, but still very slow. I will upload it to the website.
While in most cases, it might be somewhat complicated to reduce the amount of objects and still be able to work meaningfully in the file, in your case it should be more straight forward.
You have over 60 000 single surfaces in your scene. Joining these into polysurfaces should greatly reduce the number of objects:
image1413707 143 KB
The New DSL 2024 has been reborn as a compact Linux distribution tailored for low-spec x86 computers. It packs a lot of applications into a small package. All the applications are chosen for their functionality, small size, and low dependencies. DSL 2024 also has many text-based applications that make it handy to use in a term window or TTY.
Creating the original DSL, a versatile 50MB distribution, was a lot of fun and one of the things I am most proud of as a personal accomplishment. However, as a concept, it was in the right place at the right time, and the computer industry has changed a lot since then. While it would be possible to make a bootable Xwindows 50MB distribution today, it would be missing many drivers and have only a handful of very rudimentary applications. People would find such a distribution a fun toy or something to build upon, but it would not be usable for the average computer user out of the gate.
Meanwhile, in 2024, nearly everyone has abandoned the sub-700MB size limit to run on computers old enough to not have a DVD and cannot boot off of a USB drive. This is completely understandable because applications, the kernel, and drivers have all mushroomed in their space requirements. Hats off to Puppy Linux for staying one of the few that still offer a full desktop environment in a small size.
The new goal of DSL is to pack as much usable desktop distribution into an image small enough to fit on a single CD, or a hard limit of 700MB. This project is meant to service older computers and have them continue to be useful far into the future. Such a notion sits well with my values. I think of this project as my way of keeping otherwise usable hardware out of landfills.
As with most things in the GNU/Linux community, this project continues to stand on the shoulders of giants. I am just one guy without a CS degree, so for now, this project is based on antiX 23 i386. AntiX is a fantastic distribution that I think shares much of the same spirit as the original DSL project. AntiX shares pedigree with MEPIS and also leans heavily on the geniuses at Debian. So, this project stands on the shoulders of giants. In other words, DSL 2024 is a humble little project!
Unlike the original DSL, this version has apt fully enabled. So if there is anything you feel is missing, it is very simple to get it installed. I also made an effort to leave as much of the antiX goodness enabled as possible. However, it must be said that DSL is a derivative work but also a reductive work. Some things from antiX may be broken or missing. If you find a bug, it is likely my fault.
Like I said above 4th time was the charm, and most of the time it works fine. I've been using 7-zip for over 5 years now, and use it several times every day. And I (for the most part) use it the same way. The only variations I make is extract here/some other location, and password/name coded vs Orig Name/No-Pass. As far as extracting I tried extract here AND to my Download Folder (Diff From 7z file). And the locaton of the 7z in 700MB pieces was in a folder in my D Drive (Just 1 small folder name/so names is NOT to long)
NO, I made that mistake in my early 7-zip days. And I thought that too, but checked it starting with my 2nd try. Lets see what happens. I have to wonder if this is more windows 10 B.S.? Windows 10 just did some major updates and I think that some things got worse. I might go back to Win 7 in the next day or so. I will let you know if there is ANY problems after.
Like I said above that my first thought was that I had changed to "Full pathnames" / "Absolute pathnames" because I did that in the early days 9.20 or before, but checked on the 2nd and 3rd time and NO. As far as non standard window NO, nor did I use search. I think I have only used the search to try it in Win 10 in the early test drive days. The only time I use that anyway is "wait where the hell is ?" Like I said before Win 10 has been a little MORE weird this week after the big Nov/Fall update to 1511. Added more crap I don't want (skydrive is even more of a Big Bro) so I'm going back to Win 7 for at least a while.
Hi Igor, are there any news regarding the future your installers? Will there be or will there not be MSI installers. Without MSI installers your lovely software will lose all its benefits for me and my company and well have to move on to another product... If you tell me, well have to wait for another 3-6 months it would be okay, but waiting for something thatll never happen is not an option. So please give your users ( including me ) a definitive answer to the question: Are you going to offer MSI Installation packages again or not and if so - when?
b37509886e