Hello Debra, Betty and everybody else who might be reading this.
Really good to be here. I am looking forward to this MOOC and sharing
experiences and ideas with you. What attracted me to this MOOC is the
title, the context but also the fact that it is a MOOC. When do we
actually call an OOC a MOOC? When we have over 100, 1000, 10,000
participants? Can/Could this be defined by numbers? What about
individuals who don't register at all but still engage in their own
way? How do we keep track of people? Do we keep track of people? I am
already asking questions. I hope this is ok.
Anyway, I am an Academic Developer at the University of Salford in the
UK and I am really interested to see how this will work. We are
developing our own open access module at the moment, well, we are
starting in Sep which will then be offered in January. We are not
thinking that it will be a MOOC, just an open access module but how
can we know that it won't become a MOOC? How do you prepare for this
eventuality? More questions...
I love anything creative and am very experimental in my approach to
learning and teaching. Risk taking is part of what I do. Not
everything works, of course. But this is part of the fun and learning.
Some of my students have called me mad... is this a bad thing?
I am also looking forward to the diverse people I will have the
opportunity to meet and interact, thanks to this MOOC, as Debra also
mentions in her post.
Speak again soon.
Chrissi (on Twitter: @chrissinerantzi)
ps. If you would like to find out more about me, please access my
Linkedin profile at
http://www.linkedin.com/in/chrissinerantzi
pps. The plan is to keep a reflective diary on my blog at
http://chrissinerantzi.wordpress.com/ and one post is already there.
Feel free to comment and engage.
pps. Today, I finished editing a video, which might be useful for some
of you in the context of open education. We are starting a new series
called Food for thought. Have a look at
http://youtu.be/y9HCK3wKmD0 to
watch the very first one if you like.