On 14/04/2015 10:04,
coin...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thank you for that. This looks great and promising !
>
> I did an early test with a Noxon stick but have problems with
> synchronisation.
> What is strange is that it can synchronise using rtl-dab but I will
> continue to investigate.
That's odd. The only difference I can think of is that dabtools (at the
moment) only locks onto a signal when it finds 10 consecutive
transmission frames with no CRC errors in the FIBs. So if your
reception is borderline, rtl-dab may indicate a lock, but sdr2eti will not.
To test that theory, try uncommenting line 82 in sdr2eti.c - that will
display the number of FIBs in each TF with correct CRCs.
> There were some changes in rtl-dab since February but I don't know if
> you have applied them.
>
I've just taken a quick look at the commits to rtl-dab made over the
past few days, and I don't think any of them should affect the sync.
But I'll look properly this evening, and merge any changes which affect
the files I've forked into dabtools.
> I have not yet checked if you can decode DAB+. At least having an
> option to dump the subchannel (without decoding the DAB+ superframes)
> could already be useful.
>
DAB+ worked OK in my single test, using a combination of sdr2eti and
etisnoop.
> The modular approach is interesting because it offers the possibility
> to use different hardware, if sdr2eti could take any IQ input then it
> could be easily used with USRP, HackRF or any other platform.
Yes, I'm intending to make it support as many input formats/hardware
devices as possible. Once I fully unify the code for the Wavefinder and
RTL-SDR, I'll look at other things.
> On the other side, the possibility, to get raw suchannel and stream
> them elsewhere can be interesting for making a remote controlled receiver.
> In the past, there was a nice project dabusb from Baycom
> (
http://www.baycom.de/hardware/dabusb/ ) where you could see all the
> ensemble information, including slideshow on a webpage and could
> stream the programs on HTTP without decoding/re-encoding them.
> Unfortunately the hardware it was working on has disappeared since years.
>
Yes, that's what I'm trying to avoid with dabtools - there seem to have
been various DAB applications over the years, but most are tied to
specific hardware. By abstracting the decoding to the ETI layer, I'm
hoping more useful applications can be built.
Regards,
Dave.