Groups keyboard shortcuts have been updated
Dismiss
See shortcuts

TD-DFT energies

48 views
Skip to first unread message

Miguel RP

unread,
Apr 23, 2025, 10:11:03 AMApr 23
to cp2k

Hi All,

I'm running a TD-DFT calculation on a flake system composed of C, Ti, and O atoms.

When using the PBE functional, the calculation finishes successfully, but the excitation energies seem suspiciously low:


         State    Excitation      
         number   energy (eV)    
         ----------------------------------------
 TDDFPT|      1       0.08219  
 TDDFPT|      2       0.11190  
 TDDFPT|      3       0.14461  
 TDDFPT|      4       0.15730   
 TDDFPT|      5       0.17494 
 TDDFPT|      6       0.18766   
 TDDFPT|      7       0.21300  
 TDDFPT|      8       0.22745
 TDDFPT|      9       0.24470
 TDDFPT|     10       0.26010  

I’ve attached my input file in case anyone is willing to take a look and help identify anything that might be causing this behavior.

I've also tried using the PBE0 hybrid functional, but the calculation gets stuck during the SCF procedure and doesn’t seem to make progress—even after running for over a day. It stays at the following output:
  
 SCF WAVEFUNCTION OPTIMIZATION

  Step     Update method      Time    Convergence         Total energy    Change
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  HFX_MEM_INFO| Est. max. program size before HFX [MiB]:                     490

 *** WARNING in hfx_energy_potential.F:587 :: The Kohn Sham matrix is not  ***
 *** 100% occupied. This may result in incorrect Hartree-Fock results. Try ***
 *** to decrease EPS_PGF_ORB and EPS_FILTER_MATRIX in the QS section. For  ***
 *** more information see FAQ: https://www.cp2k.org/faq:hfx_eps_warning    ***

I’ve already tried decreasing EPS_PGF_ORB and EPS_FILTER_MATRIX as suggested, but the issue persists.

Thanks in advance!

Best,

Miguel
es_diag_temp.inp

Jürg Hutter

unread,
Apr 24, 2025, 8:17:44 AMApr 24
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Hi

you are mixing PBE/PBE0, at least in the input you posted. See basis sets/ pseudopotentals
and referenz functional for D3. However, this is not causing problems, it is just bad practice.

If you want to use PBE0 for this system and basis set, I would strongly encourage to use
ADMM. You can find many example inputs in the tests/QS section.

regards
JH

________________________________________
From: cp...@googlegroups.com <cp...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Miguel RP <miguel...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2025 4:08 PM
To: cp2k
Subject: [CP2K:21411] TD-DFT energies
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com<mailto:cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/16f84b7a-79b9-46da-8308-8aff3ac3ac61n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/16f84b7a-79b9-46da-8308-8aff3ac3ac61n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages