Strange Electronic density on regular grids for Na
55 views
Skip to first unread message
Stanislav Bachurin
unread,
Jul 10, 2024, 5:17:24 PM7/10/24
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to cp2k
Good evening, cp2k experts. I encountered an unusual artifact: while optimizing the geometry of various ions in an aqueous environment (using SCRF methods), I found that for the Na cation, the electronic density on regular grids is -7.9999991679. This deviation occurs in all models where the Na+ ion is used. This problem does not occur for lithium and potassium (-2.0000000000 and -8.0000000000, respectively). Is this a serious artifact, or can it be ignored?
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Hi
this most likely due to the different exponents in the basis sets.
The largest exponent (important for the cutoff needed) in
Li-q3 : 7
Na-q9 : 23
K-q9: 2.5
You need a higher cutoff for Na or you have to use GAPW.
regards
JH
________________________________________
From: cp...@googlegroups.com <cp...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Stanislav Bachurin <bachurin...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2024 11:17 PM
To: cp2k
Subject: [CP2K:20440] Strange Electronic density on regular grids for Na
Good evening, cp2k experts. I encountered an unusual artifact: while optimizing the geometry of various ions in an aqueous environment (using SCRF methods), I found that for the Na cation, the electronic density on regular grids is -7.9999991679. This deviation occurs in all models where the Na+ ion is used. This problem does not occur for lithium and potassium (-2.0000000000 and -8.0000000000, respectively). Is this a serious artifact, or can it be ignored?