Choosing parameters in CP2K

1,184 views
Skip to first unread message

huan...@mail.huji.ac.il

unread,
Oct 1, 2013, 8:43:48 AM10/1/13
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Dear All,
I am a newbie to CP2K. I have a project on benzene-water cluster and I would like to run MD simulation using DFT PBE functional. 

I have some questions on choosing basis set and parameters for MD simulation. However, after I checked the examples or CP2K reference, I did not get any answers.

In the example file of /opt/cp2k/test/QS/regtest-dft-vdw-corr/dftd3_t1.inp, it used two different basis set for one system, like,
    &KIND H
      BASIS_SET DZV-GTH
      POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q1
    &END
    &KIND C
      BASIS_SET DZVP-GTH
      POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q4

Is that OK? I mean if there is an argon atom in my cluster, as basis set not always including all the atoms after the 3rd period, can I choose different basis set for calculation?


In the section of  DISPERSION_FUNCTIONAL, I saw another example like,
      &vdW_POTENTIAL
         DISPERSION_FUNCTIONAL PAIR_POTENTIAL
         &PAIR_POTENTIAL
            TYPE DFTD3
            PARAMETER_FILE_NAME ../dftd3.dat
            REFERENCE_FUNCTIONAL PBE
            CALCULATE_C9_TERM T
            R_CUTOFF 7.
         &END PAIR_POTENTIAL
      &END vdW_POTENTIAL

the R_CUTOFF parameter is set to 7. The description in the CP2K reference is too brief to understand.
       R_CUTOFF 24.0
       Range of potential. The cutoff will be 2 times this value  [Edit]
       This optional keyword cannot be repeated and it expects precisely one real.
       Default value: 1.05835442E+01
       Default unit: [angstrom]

Is there any rules to set the value of R_CUTOFF? Is there any relationships with what kinds of potential I chose?  Or for what kind of system (contained what kinds of atoms), the R_CUTOFF value should be increased or reduced? 


Another question is what's the difference between DFTD3 and DFTD2? Which one is more suitable for the weak interaction such like pi-hydrogen bond? I did not find any description in the CP2K input reference.
    TYPE DFTD2
   Type of potential:
     DFTD2 → Grimme D2 method
     DFTD3 → Grimme D3 method
   [Edit]
   This optional keyword cannot be repeated and it expects precisely one keyword.
   Default value: DFTD3
   List of valid keywords:
   DFTD2
    Without description, yet.  [Edit]
   DFTD3
    Without description, yet.  [Edit]

I appreciated it very much for any of you can give me explanations or suggestions on choosing those parameters. Thank you.

Best regards,
Huan


Andreas Funk

unread,
Oct 1, 2013, 9:22:56 AM10/1/13
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Dear Huan,

I can give you reply to your second question. You should use the D3 method. It is less empirical than the D2 method and improved some other issues, i.e. it takes the molecular geometry better into consideration. My own experience is that the D3 method gives more reliable results with weak interactions. I suggest you also compute the C9 term. Maybe you should also read the paper of Grimme: J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010); doi: 10.1063/1.3382344. It explains the D3 method in detail.

Best regards,
Andreas

huan...@mail.huji.ac.il

unread,
Oct 1, 2013, 10:01:09 AM10/1/13
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Dear Andreas,
Thanks very much for your quick response and suggestion. I will read the paper you recommended.

Best wishes,
Huan

simin pahlavi

unread,
May 2, 2018, 11:13:39 AM5/2/18
to cp2k
Hello everybody,
I have same the problem, " Is there any rules to set the value of R_CUTOFF?"Could we set it to  1/2 (2.5 sigma) in Lenard johns interactions?
Thank you in advance
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages