You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to cp2k
I noticed in the 2026.1 release of CP2K a new feature 'NEGF: New method to extract the matrix Hamiltonians for electrodes'. I have been running NEGF calculations using an earlier version of CP2K 2024.2, is there a notable performance or accuracy difference with the new method (or from other changes to NEGF)?
I also just found the SMEAGOL NEGF interface option, I am unfamiliar with SMEAGOL and would like to ask if there is any advantage to using that interface vs the internal CP2K NEGF routines?
Dmitry Ryndyk
unread,
Jan 24, 2026, 1:57:45 AM (4 days ago) Jan 24
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to cp2k
Dear Michael,
One example. If you run regtest-negf-2, you may find the result in regtest-negf-2_2024.png, which is incorrect. New code gives regtest-negf-2_2024.png.