Bad condition number R_COND = 2.214E-19

483 views
Skip to first unread message

Mithun M

unread,
Aug 24, 2022, 6:53:05 AM8/24/22
to cp2k
Dear All, 
Please see the error I received while optimizing a geometry.

Bad condition number R_COND = 2.214E-19 (smaller than the machine working precision) 

Please also see the full input here. 

&GLOBAL
  PROJECT H2O
  RUN_TYPE GEO_OPT
  PRINT_LEVEL LOW
&END GLOBAL
&FORCE_EVAL
  METHOD QS
  &SUBSYS
    &CELL
      ABC 25 25 25
    &END CELL
    &COORD
.......................................
&END COORD
    &KIND H
      BASIS_SET TZVP-GTH
      POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q1
    &END KIND
    &KIND O
      BASIS_SET TZVP-GTH
      POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q6
    &END KIND
    &KIND C
      BASIS_SET TZVP-GTH
      POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q4
    &END KIND
    &KIND N
      BASIS_SET TZVP-GTH
      POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q5
    &END KIND

  &END SUBSYS
  &DFT
    BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME BASIS_SETS
    POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME POTENTIAL
    &QS
      EPS_DEFAULT 1.0E-7
    &END QS
    &MGRID
      CUTOFF 200
      NGRIDS 4
      REL_CUTOFF 30
    &END MGRID
    &SCF
      SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
      EPS_SCF 1.0E-05
      MAX_SCF 200
      &DIAGONALIZATION T
        ALGORITHM STANDARD
      &END DIAGONALIZATION
      &MIXING T
        ALPHA 0.5
        METHOD PULAY_MIXING
        NPULAY 5
      &END MIXING
      &PRINT
        &RESTART OFF
        &END RESTART
      &END PRINT
    &END SCF
 &XC
      &XC_FUNCTIONAL PBE
      &END XC_FUNCTIONAL
    &END XC
  &END DFT
&END FORCE_EVAL
&MOTION
  &GEO_OPT
    TYPE MINIMIZATION
    MAX_DR    1.0E-03
    MAX_FORCE 1.0E-03
    RMS_DR    1.0E-03
    RMS_FORCE 1.0E-03
    MAX_ITER 200
    OPTIMIZER CG
    &CG
      MAX_STEEP_STEPS  0
      RESTART_LIMIT 9.0E-01
    &END CG
  &END GEO_OPT
  &CONSTRAINT
    &FIXED_ATOMS
      COMPONENTS_TO_FIX XYZ
      LIST 1
    &END FIXED_ATOMS
  &END CONSTRAINT
&END MOTION


I look forward in hearing from you all. Thanks in Advance.

With Regards 
Mithun M 

Thomas Kühne

unread,
Aug 24, 2022, 8:12:19 AM8/24/22
to 'Dorothea Golze' via cp2k
Dear Mithun M, 

certainly EPS_DEFAULT (at least 10E-10, better 10E-12) is not low enough und CUTOFF (280, better 320+ Ry) too low. 
Also, I would also reduce EPS_SCF (~10E-6, when using traditional diagonalization). 

Best, 
Thomas Kühne

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/21293e28-b163-4e2b-875e-0cde9a94d73dn%40googlegroups.com.



==============================
Thomas D. Kühne
Dynamics of Condensed Matter
Chair of Theoretical Chemistry
University of Paderborn
Warburger Str. 100
D-33098 Paderborn
Germany

ChStCo

unread,
May 24, 2024, 8:26:53 AM5/24/24
to cp2k
For anyone looking this up, this is probably due to the usage of Pulay mixing.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages