Any help would be greadly appreciated
Regards,
Andreas Stavrinou
Hope this helps.
"Andreas Stavrinou" <andreas....@globalsoft.com.cy> wrote in message
news:F0scnaB...@dogwood.us.checkpoint.com...
Thanks for the reply, however the client is not comfortable opening all high
ports and creating a "swiss cheese" situation. Instead he insists on using
the SQLNet proxy (port tunneling) feature that comes with Checkpoint 4.1 SP2
and open only the default (I believe) 1610 port. Any ideas on that?
Regards
"steve" <st...@nodomain.com> wrote in message
news:4K$ELtG5A...@dogwood.us.checkpoint.com...
Opening SQLnet2 which is stateful would probably be better, then. Note
that you should not use BOTH SQLnet1 and SQLnet2. Having them both will
trigger SQLnet1.
/Johan Lindqvist
--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E d+ s: a- C++(+++)$ ULOSI*++(++++)$ P+++$>++++$ L++ E>++$ W+(+++)
N++ o? K-? w---(++)$ O? M-(+) V? PS++ PE-(--) Y++(+) PGP++ t++@ !5-
!X- R tv b++ DI++++ D+ G++ e+++ h--- r+++ y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
When I allowed only sqlnet2, I still see in the log 1521 being accepted but
another
high numbered port blocked. This high-numbered port atleast in the
limited experiments that I carried out was constant. Do I need to allow this port
explicitly?
Thanks
Suren