The defensive undercurrent of the article aside, however, part of me
agrees with Dixon: Coworking isn't a new invention, it's been going on
for millenia, no doubt, and in many stellar examples in ways that many
coworking spaces can only long for. Arguing that coworking didn't
begin until 2005 because that's when the word was first used to
describe a particular set of values about how to cowork seems to me to
be a bit off the mark and to focus on labels over content (especially
since there are so many self-identified coworking spaces that have not
yet achieved their lofty ideals, my own space included).
That said, Regus is clearly not one of those venues where coworking
(between independent workers or members of different organizations)
tends to happen. And if their way of "coworking" counts, then they
clearly aren't the first, since there have been business lounges since
long-before Regus was founded in 1989, I'm sure some airport or dozens
of hotel chains could make better claims to being the first. :)
Well that’s just great, and I have no doubt that New Work City is a healthy development. But it’s not for everyone
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Coworking" group.
To post to this group, send email to cowo...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to coworking+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.
I led a Barcamp-style session at Coworking Europe called “Coworking History 101″ where I kicked off by telling the origin story that I knew, as far back and as detailed as I could go. I then suggested that others in the room tell their origin stories, knowing full well that they would be different. Even in this self-selecting group – our experiences of “when coworking began” were varied.
What was common, in some cases, was relative time period. What was common, in some cases, was the experience we had right before discovering coworking. And in some cases, specific people and times wove through our stories as if they were connected.
My point was well illustrated: there’s no single history of coworking, and just like there is no single history of Rock and Roll.
Music history does a good job of describing such histories, though and I think there’s lessons to be learned there.
Much like coworking in the last decade, “Rock and Roll” was a disruptive force in the 1950s. And like coworking being a style of work, Rock and Roll is a style of music, with endless room for invention and reinvention, for classification and interpretation.
Also like Rock and Roll, I believe that once coworking enters this collective consciousness, it’s here to stay and at the same time, will continue to evolve into countless additional genres.
I often love telling people that coworking was pretty much stolen from
artist that have been sharing resources and finding inspiration from
each other for centuries. I think it is the finding inspiration and
building camaraderie in a shared space in ancient artist communes that
most resembles what coworking is about.
I recently was published on the a post on the blog.coworking.com about
this subject called Evolved: Regus to Coworking. I discussed how the
coworking movement learned some things from Regus and how technology
advancements allowed for coworking to exsits and how those changes
allowed for coworking managers to create a space that fosters a new
type of relationship between the people and space.
Craig
Creative Density
> <dangerouslyawes...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > One of my favorite interactions is when an artist visits Indy Hall and
> > says "oh, I wish I had a place like this!" and my response is, "you do
> > realize that we stole this idea from artists, right?"
>
> > Of course, lessons from arts communities, writing communities, and many
> > others that have been around for centuries are baked into coworking. Steven
> > Johnson's book "Where good ideas come from" points to the existence of
> > unique and serendipitous "3rd places" during every period of innovation in
> > history. Cafes, salons, and other casual gathering places weren't
> > necessarily places of business, but became the rooted origins of many
> > business innovations. (Got 10 mins? Watch this video version of the book
> > for a quick redux:
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=NugRZGDbPFU)
>
> > Point is, of *course* this isn't a new idea, which makes it hilarious
> > that anyone defends it.
>
> > But it *is* a new way of executing it, led with different intents and
> > purposes (or in some cases, less intents and purposes).
>
> > Further, it's not just one, but many, many new ways of executing it.
>
> >> Well that’s just great, and I have no doubt that New Work City is a
> >> healthy development. *But it’s not for everyone*
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Coworking" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/coworking/-/0kotVhUK3PcJ.
To post to this group, send email to cowo...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to coworking+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.
Attachments:- Screen Shot 2012-07-02 at 4.21.53 PM.png
--
"Barristers are not employed in a law firm but associate fraternally with each other, sharing the burden of costs, in a set of chambers. They are legally considered to be self-employed."
When talking about the two businesses as competitors, the analogy that seems to work well is comparing a sushi restaurant to a steakhouse. Once you refine your needs/wants any deeper than "food" or "work", there's enough differentiation that there isn't any real competition.
I'm a Regus customer simply because I mostly work from home and it's when I'm in NYC that I need work space. Since they're worldwide, it just works out to be a better bargain for me. I use their centers when I'm on the road.
However, I heard of places like New Work City and other co-working spaces in NYC first. In fact, I know people who work for NWC and work at NWC. I started my business in NYC and the tech community there is really active and social. A lot of events happen at these spaces. When I moved back to the San Francisco Bay Area, I joined HUB first. They have two offices here: one in Berkeley and one in San Francisco. Unfortunately, I just found HUB not to fit what I needed most because they don't have a NYC location: a place to set up my laptop, focus and work no matter where I am. That's why I joined Regus. If I'm in Manhattan, I've got a place to work rather than having to fight for a seat and access to a plug in Starbucks. It's also convenient to be able to go to San Francisco and work. It so happens that a friend's company is in the same building of the center I use. We can meet up for lunch frequently and then head back to work.
It's clear that the article is biased. The tone is dismissive and condescending too. Regus isn't going to work for everyone. It's pretty sterile and massively corporate. It's definitely not a place where there is a lot of brainstorming and interaction. From what I've noticed the people using the lounges are like me: they're in town for business and simply need a place to get things done. That doesn't build community except with the people at the front desk who end up knowing me well when I show up daily for a few days. It's just a very bad and biased article.