Iso Not Mounting Windows 10

0 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

Ronald

unread,
Jul 18, 2024, 9:03:36 AM7/18/24
to countligntero

However, I am duel booting windows. I am trying to mount my windows partition to linux, but I am unsure if there are any downsides to doing that. If I do mount it, then delete the linux installation, will that effect my windows install? Is there anything else I should know about, as far as negative repercussions to mounting? If not, then it would be awesome if you could link me to a guide I can use do mount the windows drive.

however you might run into issues with windows system partition(c:) or maybe others, if the windows fastboot option is enabled (it is by default), then c: drive will only be mounted in read-only mode, disabling fast boot will let you get read-write access. also refrain from accessing windows partitions if you hibernate windows.

iso not mounting windows 10


Descargar archivo https://urluss.com/2yPLHs



Slow loading speed when mounting Drive on Windows (11). When I access to a folder which has lots of subfolders or file (even just access to a shared drive), it is very slow. Sometimes my explorer crashes bcs of it. Could you guys help me to optimise to load files faster?

When you use rclone with Google drive in its default configuration you are using rclone's client_id. This is shared between all the rclone users. There is a global rate limit on the number of queries per second that each client_id can do set by Google

first, i would create client id for gdrive/dropbox. not clear is that makes a difference with onedrive.
and mega is going to be very slow, no matter what you tweak. for testing, i would remove that.

Ouhm just randomly.... I have seen somewhere that said set the --buffer-size=0. Then I felt it faster to load a video. I tried to set 18 and it didn't change much. After all I keep 18 for no reason
By the way thank you. It loads file faster than default client (not as fast as I expected but I think it's fine).

Sorry for posting an answer I can't comment yet. It sounds like a permissions error, I'd look up setting correct permissions for cifs. I had similar issues not being able to write to my shares when I set up my NAS using a raspberry pi. Try something along the lines of //your/server/ /your/mount/point cifs defaults,uid=username,gid=username,user=user,password=password,rw 0 0 obviously you can replace the username/password bit with you credentials. Also try sudo mount -t cifs //your/server /mount/point/ -o username=username to test mounting without having to reboot.

The solution is to add them to /etc/fstab, but with options to prevent them from being automatically mounted. The option you want is noauto rather than auto. For example, to prevent a windows partition from being mounted, you could add an entry like the following:

Or, to make it more self-documenting and simpler, although not quite as fail-proof, I have switched to using disk labels rather than UUIDs. You just need to make sure the label is descriptive and unique; unlike using UUIDs, labels are not guaranteed to be unique, but I've never run into a problem, and it's more convenient, as you can swap a different partition by using the same label, and no need to modify /etc/fstab, or to run blkid.

Still had the same problem though, which is strange 'cos it works fine if I edit fstab by hand! Looking further the script tries to mount the share using mount cifs versions from 3.1.1 down to 1.0 and on success updates fstab with that command.

My set-up is latest Buster dietpi running on a pi3 and the share is on an ancient version of a Windows 2008 server (WHS 2011). I did some tests and from the command line, versions above 2.1 do not work even with a non space path, so I cannot test further with versions 3.0 and 3.1.1.

My conclusion is that although the code in drive manager may work for versions 3.0 and abover (I cannot test it), for version 2.1 and below the script is broken because mount cifs does not support the \040 substitution for a space in the same way it is used in fstab.

yup that seems to be working, at least for the mount part. What I noticed, some strange visualisation within drive manager with the mount containing spaces. For testing purposes i did 2 mounts. First one is a normal one, the second a mount with spaces.

Okay works fine now according to my tests. Performance has even become slightly better since bind mount exclusion needed to be done differently, which is now more efficient: DietPi-Drive_Manager Fix handling mount sources and targets with spaces by MichaIng Pull Request #3497 MichaIng/DietPi GitHub

Only downside is that managing two mount points of the same file system is not possible now with drive manager. However adding a second mount of the same source was not possible before, and AFAIK managing those would have caused issues, at least when unmounting one it would have been lost on a new drive scan loop, etc.
samba.png72036 1.89 KB

I have a windows share on a windows2003 server (WINJOE) which I want to back up to a Linux machine (LINUXJOE) that is properly joined to the domain. My goal is to backup shared folders of WINJOE to LINUXJOE while keeping windows permissions/owners. After reading the relevant literature, I am under the impression that this is not possible...

At the moment I am able to login using my windows domain account to LINUXJOE, and if I create files on LINUXJOE's filesystem, they show the owner as "somewinuser "domain users"", so user mapping from windows to linux works ok. When I mount \\WINJOE\important_folder using the following command:

Is it in any way possible, to view the proper owner of files on windows shares, and keep that owner along with all windows security attributes when I rsync from a windows share to my linux backup box?

Unfortunately Linux ACLs and Windows ACLs are very different. When you access a Linux filesystem from Windows via Samba, Samba manages to map the simpler Linux ACLs to Windows ACLs without losing too much information. For this to work you already need many of the options you have in your smb.conf.

The other way around is much harder and probably even impossible, especially as a Linux mount has a different semantics than a Windows mapped share. And the mount happens with a kernel driver that doesn't implement the ACLs at all. The only way we have is to get the information with additional programs like getcifsacl.

So normal Linux tools like rsync don't know anything about the Windows ACLs and can't store them. If you need to restore those ACLs, you'll need to save them yourself with getcifsacl and restore with setcifsacl. As these commands only work on single files unfortunately and setcifsacl cannot work with the output of getcifsacl directly, you'll need a sofisticated set of scripts to backup/restore those ACLs. A quick search didn't show any existing solution.

There are at least two ways to install windows in your walls: (1) using masonry straps, or (2) inside a window buck. But these two approaches require different sizes for your rough openings. So if your rough openings have already been made, and your windows have already been ordered, you may have only one possible approach.

It sounds like you will be installing these windows as "in-betweenies." That usually means that you need to order non-flanged windows -- although if you want to install flanged windows as in-betweenies, you can, as long as you plan ahead with really big rough openings. (For more on this last technique, see Windows in Double-Stud Walls: In-Betweenies.)

Also note that you may need to add insulation on the exterior or interior to achieve the level of insulation required by your local code. The eight-inch block has an R-value of R-8 to R-11. FWIW I like the product but think its performance characteristics are misrepresented.

Thanks for the quick responses! The block walls are almost to the roof line now - we'll be pouring the bond beam soon. The windows are not ordered and the window openings don't have any buck strips or forms installed - just bare block currently. The openings are quite large so we have flexibility with mounting still. As for insulation, we are framing the interior against the walls which gives us another 3 1/2 of insulation in addition to the block itself.

Are there any details on how to properly mount windows with masonry straps? I'm looking for the most durable and air-tight approach feasible. Also, any ideas on how to get it to look good with the stucco on the outside? I'm not sure how to bring it all together.

Mike,
You need to follow all of the usual rules for installing windows, especially flashing rules. The entire window rough opening needs to be flashed. The sill pan (either a site-built sill pan or a manufactured sill pan) is especially important.

Basically, I use CIFS to mount the Windows share with 0777 to an empty path on the host like /shares/files. When creating the container I wish to access it, I add a volume by including the below string:

Note: I tested mounting to a folder which pre-exists in the container as well as defining a new one when creating the container. When connecting to the container after creation, I found that it did create /filestest yet I got the same error when trying to list files within it.

The closest I got was by downloading and testing the binary as after setting its permissions, I could execute "docker-volume-netshare -h" and see the help and other notes. When attempting to use it by executing "docker volume create -d cifs --name myserver/files$" (which is a valid shared path), I got the error:

This article points out that we can mount a drive with a hostname / IP as part of the path. In Windows DFS, we are not using a hostname but rather the domain of the AD network i.e. //Company.local/Public

Thanks for the follow-up. I have been able to mount directly to a Windows DFS host (DFS1.domain.local\Public) but not to the DFS namespace (Domain.local\Public) itself. Why this is important to mount to the DFS namespace instead of a host, is to prevent any downtime if DFS host goes offline.

d3342ee215
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages