I don't know about the plans, but CouchDB's API didn't change much between 0.10 and 0.11 and I think Lounge should work just fine.
Cheers
Jan
--
On 31 Mar 2010, at 18:15, kdidenhover wrote:
> Any plans to modify lounge to work with 0.11.0 release of couch?
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
Jan is correct. Untested so far but it should 'just work'.
There are new features in 0.11 that we will be looking to leverage soon, however support for 0.10 series is likely to remain for a while. 0.9 is not supported any longer, but _may_ still work.
On Mar 31, 2010 10:29 AM, "Jan Lehnardt" <j...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,
I don't know about the plans, but CouchDB's API didn't change much between 0.10 and 0.11 and I think Lounge should work just fine.
Cheers
Jan
--
On 31 Mar 2010, at 18:15, kdidenhover wrote:
> Any plans to modify lounge to work with 0.11.0 rele...
The patch on 0.10 is just so the provided auto-replication script can replicate just the design documents between shards. It can be rewritten to use 0.11's replication by doc id instead. I would happily accept a pull request with a new version of the replicator that doesn't need the patch.
On Mar 31, 2010 1:16 PM, "Kurt Didenhover" <kdide...@gmail.com> wrote:
Any need to patch 0.11 like 0.10.*?
On Mar 31, 2010, at 2:08 PM, Randall Leeds wrote:
> Jan is correct. Untested so far but it should...
Anyone else having problems with the new doc_ids specification?
On Mar 31, 2:18 pm, Randall Leeds <randall.le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The patch on 0.10 is just so the provided auto-replication script can
> replicate just the design documents between shards. It can be rewritten to
> use 0.11's replication by doc id instead. I would happily accept a pull
> request with a new version of the replicator that doesn't need the patch.
>